DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Thinning on Fine Root Distribution and Litterfall in a Pinus koraiensis Plantation

  • Park, Byung-Bae (Division of Forest Restoration, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Im-Kyun (Division of Forest Restoration, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Yang, Hee-Moon (Division of Forest Ecology, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • Published : 2009.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of thinning on fine root biomass and vertical distribution. and litterfall amount in a 50 year old Pinus koraiensis plantation in Chuncheon, Kangwon Province. Fine root (< 2 mm in diameter) biomass ($367\;g/m^2$) in the site 'OC_75', thinning once in 1975, was 68% of those in the site 'CON', no thinning after planting, and in the site 'TC_00', thinning twice in 1975 and 2000. There were no significant differences of dead roots among treatments. Diameter $0{\sim}1\;mm$ roots were vertically decreased only in the TC_00 site. The litterfall was very similar between OC_75 ($5.2\;Mg\;ha^{-1}\;yr^{-1}$) and TC_00 ($4.7\;Mg\;ha^{-1}\;yr^{-1}$), but the composition of litterfall was different: The proportion of leaves and branches was 80% and 13% in OC_75 and 56% and 36% in TC_00, respectively. Reduction of P. koraiensis density by thinning decreased leaf litter as well as fine roots of P. koraiensis, but increased fine roots production by neighboring understory plants offset the reduction of fine roots of P. koraiensis. We suggest that belowground as well as aboveground responses, including both over- and understory vegetation, should be considered to measure the responses of trees in thinned forest ecosystems.

Keywords

References

  1. Aber JD, Melillo IM, Nadelhoffer KJ, McClaugherty CA, Pastor J. 1985. Fine root turnover in forest ecosystems in relation to quantity and form of nitrogen availability: a comparison of two methods. Oecologia 66: 317-321 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378292
  2. Blanco JA, Imbert JB, Castillo FJ. 2008. Nutrient return via litterfall in two contrasting Pinus sylvestris forests in the Pyrenees under different thinning intensities. For Ecol Manage 256: 1840-1852 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.07.011
  3. Bray JR, Gorham E. 1964. Litter production in forest of the world. Adv Ecol Res 2: 101-158 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60331-1
  4. Campbell J, Alberti G, Martin J, Law BE. 2009. Carbon dynamics of a ponderosa pine plantation following a thinning treatment in the northern Sierra Nevada. For Ecol Manage 257: 453-463 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.021
  5. Carlye Je. 1998. Relationships between nitrogen uptake, leafarea, water status and growth in an ll-year-old Pinus radiate plantation in response to thinning, thinning residue, and nitrogen fertilizer. For Ecol Manage 108: 41-55 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00333-2
  6. Finzi AC, Canham CD, Breemen NV. 1998. Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on pH and cations. Ecol Appl 8: 447-454
  7. Fisher RF, Binkley D. 2000. Ecology and Management of Forest Soils 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons. New York, U.S.A
  8. Fogel R. 1983. Root turnover and productivity of coniferous forests. Plant Soil 71: 75-85 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182643
  9. Gale MR, Grigal DF. 1987. Vertical root distributions of northern tree species in relation to successional status. Can J For Res 17:829-834 https://doi.org/10.1139/x87-131
  10. Harrington TB, Edwards MB. 1999. Understory vegetation, resource availability, and litterfall responses to pine thinning and woody vegetation control in longleaf pine plantations. Can J For Res 29:1055-1064 https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-29-7-1055
  11. Hennessey TC, Dougherty PM, Cregg BM, Wittwer RF. 1992. Annual variation in needle fall of a loblolly pine stand in relation to climate and stand density. For Ecol Manage 51: 329-338 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(92)90332-4
  12. Hwang J, Son Y, Kim C, Yi MJ, Kim ZS, Lee WK, Hong SK. 2007. Fine root dynamics in thinned and limed pitch pine and Japanese larch plantations. J Plant Nutr 30: 1821-1839 https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160701628940
  13. Inagaki Y, Kuramoto S, Torii A, Shinomiya Y, Fnkata H. 2008. Effects of thinning on leaf-fall and leaf-litter nitrogen concentration in hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endlicher) plantation stands in Japan. For Ecol Manage 255: 1859-1867 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.007
  14. Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze ED. 1997. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc Nat! Acad Sci 94: 7362-7366 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.14.7362
  15. Joslin JD, Henderson GS. 1987. Organic matter and nutrients associated with fine roots turnover in a white oak stand. For Sci 33: 330-346
  16. Keyes MR, Grier cc. 1981. Above-and below-ground net production in 40-year-old Douglas-fir stands on low and high productivity sites. Can J For Res 11: 599-605 https://doi.org/10.1139/x81-082
  17. Kim KH, Jeong YH, Jeong CG. 2003. Effects of thinning andpruning on net rainfall and interception loss in Abies holophylla. J Kor For Soc 92(3): 276-283
  18. Kim CS, Son YW, Lee WK, Jeong JY, Noh NJ. 2009. Influences of forest tending works on carbon distribution and cycling in a Pinus densiflora S. et Z. stand in Korea. For Ecol Manage 257:1420-1426 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.015
  19. Korea Forest Service 2008. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. Korea Forest Service, Taejon, Korea
  20. Lopez B, Sabate S, Gracia C. 1998. Fine roots dynamics in a Mediterranean forest: effects of drought and stem density. Tree Physiol 18: 601-606 https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/18.8-9.601
  21. Lopez BC, Sabate S, Gracia CA. 2003. Thinning effects on carbon allocation to fine roots in a Quercus ilex forest. Tree Physiol 23:1217-1224 https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/23.17.1217
  22. Magill AH, Aber JD, Hendricks JJ, Bowden RD, Melillo JM, Steudler PA. 1997. Biogeochemical response of forest ecosystems to simulated chronic nitrogen deposition. Ecol Appl 7: 402-415 https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0402:BROFET]2.0.CO;2
  23. Makkonen K, Helmisaari HS. 2001. Fine root biomass and production in Scots pine stands in relation to stand age. Tree Physiol 21:193-198 https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/21.2-3.193
  24. Martinez VA, Perry DA. 1997. Factors influencing the availability of nitrogen in thinned and unthinned Douglas-fir stands in the central Oregon Cascades. For Ecol Manage 93:195-203 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03953-9
  25. Nadelhoffer KJ, Raich JW. 1992. Fine TOot production estimates and belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Ecology 73:1139-1147 https://doi.org/10.2307/1940664
  26. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology. 2000. Laboratory Manual for Soil and Plant Tissue Analysis. Seoul, Korea
  27. Nyland RD. 2002. Silviculture: Concepts and Applications. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill. New York, U.S.A
  28. Park BB. 2006. Fine root dynamics and tissue chemistry across a calcium gradient in temperate hardwood and softwood forest ecosystems. Ph. D. Thesis, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, U.S.A
  29. Park BB. 2007. Nutrient turnover by fine roots in temperate hardwood and softwood forest ecosystems varying in calcium availability. J Kor For Soc 96(2): 213-221
  30. Park BB, Yanai RD, Vadeboncoeur MA, Hamburg SP. 2007. Estimating root biomass in rocky soils using pits, cores, and allometric equations. Soil Sci Soc A J 71: 206-213 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0329
  31. ParkBB, Kim YK, Lee SI. 2007. Effects of silvicultural treatments on carbon storage of northern hardwood forests. J Korean For Soc 96(2): 208-213
  32. Prescott CEo 1997. Effects of clearcutting and alternative silvicultural systems on rates of decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in a coastal montane coniferous forest, For Ecol Manage 95: 253260
  33. Rambo TR, North MP. 2009. Canopy microclimate response to pattern and density of thinning in a Sierra Nevada forest. For Ecol Manage 257: 435-442 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.029
  34. Safford LO, Bell S. 1972. Biomass of fine roots in a white spruce plantation. Can J For Res 2: 169-172 https://doi.org/10.1139/x72-029
  35. Santantonio D, Santantonio E. 1987. Effect of thinning on production and mortality of fine roots in a Pinus radiata plantation on a fertile site in New Zealand. Can J For Res 17: 919-928 https://doi.org/10.1139/x87-144
  36. Singh JS, Lauenroth WK, Hunt HW, Swift DM. 1984. Bias and random errors in estimators of net root production: a simulation approach. Ecology 65: 1760-1764 https://doi.org/10.2307/1937771
  37. Smith DM. 1986. The Practice of Silviculture. 8th ed. John Wiely and Sons, New York, U.S.A
  38. Son YH, Hwang JW, Lee DH, Kim JS, Yang Sy' 2001. Effects of nitrogen fertilization and thinning on growth and nutrition of current needle and twigs in Pinus koraiensis. J Korean For Soc 90(1): 28-35
  39. Tang J, Qi Y, Xu M, Misson L, Goldstein AH. 2005. Forest thinning and soil respiration in a ponderosa pine plantation in the Sierra Nevada. Tree Physiol 25: 57-66 https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.1.57
  40. Thomas SC, Halpern CB, Falk DA, Liguori DA, Austin KA. 1999. Plant diversity in management forests: understory responses to thinning and fertilization. Ecol Appl 9: 846-879
  41. Trofymow JA, Barclay HJ, McCullough KM. 1991. Annual rates and elemental concentrations of litter fall in thinned and fertilized Douglas-fir. Can J For Res 119: 553-572
  42. Vitousek PM, Gerrish G, Turner DR, Walker LR, Mueller-Dumbois D. 1995. Littcrfall and nutrient cycling in four Hawaiian montane rainforests. J Trop Ecol 11: 189-203 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400008634
  43. VOgt KA, Vogt OJ, Palmiotto PA, Boon P, O'Hara J, Asbjornsen H. 1996. Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant Soil 187: 159-219 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017088
  44. Wolk B, Rocca ME. 2009. Thinning and chipping small-diameter ponderosa pine changes understory plant communities on the Colorado Front Range. For Ecol Manage 257: 85-95 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.08.014
  45. Yanai RD, Park BB, Hamburg SP. 2006. The vertical and horizontal distribution of roots in northern hardwood stands of varying age.Can J For Res 36: 450-459 https://doi.org/10.1139/x05-254
  46. Yanai RD, Fisk MC, Fahey TJ, Cleavitt NL, Park BB. 2008. Identifying roots of northern hardwood species: patterns with diameter and depth. Can J For Res 38: 2862-2869 https://doi.org/10.1139/X08-125
  47. Yi JS, Song lM, Song JR, Bae CH, Han SU, Park YH, Hur SD. 2002. Crown shape control of Pinus koraiensis S. et Z. (VI) - The influence of thinning and stem pruning on seed production andseed characteristics (The first report). J Korean For Soc 91(3): 247-253