Textile Science and Engineering (한국섬유공학회지)

The Korean Fiber Society (한국섬유공학회)
권호 표지

Interpretation of Geogrids Junction and Tensile Behaviors by Finite Element Analysis

유한요소해석에 의한 지오그리드의 접점 및 인장거동 해석

  • An, Byoung-Wook (Construction Testing Evaluation Center, Korea Institute of Construction Materials) ;
  • Lim, Dae-Young (Department of Textile Fusion Technology, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Yeol (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Dongseo) ;
  • Chung, Chin-Gyo (School of Space Design, Busan College of Information Technology) ;
  • Jeon, Han-Yong (Division of Nano-Systems Engineering, Inha University)
  • 안병욱 (한국건자재시험연구원 건설시험평가센터) ;
  • 임대영 (한국생산기술연구원 섬유융합연구부) ;
  • 이광열 (동서대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 정진교 (부산정보대학 공간조형학부) ;
  • 전한용 (인하대학교 나노시스템공학부)
  • Published : 2009.08.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, junction strength, stress distribution of geogrids and wide-width tensile behaviors were interpreted by Visual FEA/Edu program as finite element analysis. Through comparison to test values, it is examined whether the validity of prediction values by Visual FEA/Edu program was reasonable or not. For stress distribution effect of cross machine direction ribs, warp knitted type showed better than woven type. Through contour image from the results of finite element analysis, the stress change in adjacent point around the ribs could be predicted. For analysis of tensile behaviors, prediction data of finite element analysis is dependent on the tensile test data and how to devide elements and consist the finite element network of geogrids.

Keywords

References

  1. R. M. Koemer, 'Designing with Geosynthetics', 5th Ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 2005, pp.1-78
  2. S. K. Shulka, 'Geosynthetics and Their Applications', Thomas Telford Publishing, London, UK, 2002, pp.1-54
  3. H. I. Ling, V. N. Kaliakin, and D. Leshchinsky, 'Geosynthetics and Geosynthetics-Engineered Soil Structures', McMat 2005 Conference, Baton Rouge, Lousiana, US, 2005, pp.9-124
  4. N. Dixon, D. M. Smith, J. R. Greenwood, and D. R. V. Jones, 'Geosynthetics: Protecting the Environment', Thomas Telford Publishing, London, UK, 2003, pp.93-136
  5. J. P. Giroud, 'Lessons Learned from Successes and Failures Associated with Geosynthetics', Proc. of 2nd European Geosynthetics Conference, 2002, Vol. 1, pp.77-118
  6. E. M. Palmeira, J. H. F. Pereira, and A. R. L. Silva, 'Back Analyses of Geosynthetic Reinforced Embankments on Soft Soils', Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 1998, 16(5), 274-293
  7. R. K. Rowe and A. L. Li, 'Reinforced Embankments over Soft Foundations under Undrained and Partially Drained Conditions', Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 1999, 17(3), pp.129-146 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(98)00035-1
  8. H. Y. Jeon and Y. I. Chung, 'Evaluation of Long-Term Performance of Geogrids by Mechanical Model', Text Sci Eng, 2006, 43(4), 153-158
  9. A. Paul and A. PonomaIjow, 'The Bearing Behavior of Geogrid Reinforced Crushed Stone Columns in Comparison to Nonreinforced Concrete Pile Foundations', Proceedings of the EuroGeo3, 2004, pp.285-288
  10. R. M. Koemer and T. Y. Soong, 'Geosynthetic Reinforced Segmental Retaining Walls', Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2001, 19(6), 359-386 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00012-7