Soil Resource Inventory and Mapping using Geospatial Technique

  • Jayakumar, S. (Geomatics and Remote Sensing(GRS) Lab, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Ramachandran, A. (Tamil Nadu Forest Department) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Bin (Geomatics and Remote Sensing(GRS) Lab, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Heo, Joon (Geomatics and Remote Sensing(GRS) Lab, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2008.12.01
  • Accepted : 2008.12.29
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

Soil is one of the Earth's most important resources. There are many differences among the soils of plains.like and hilly terrains, and therefore, accurate and comprehensive information on soil is essential for optimum and sustainable soil utilization. However, information on the soil of the hilly terrains of the Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu, India, is limited or absent. In the present study, Kolli hill, one among the hills of the Eastern Ghats, was soil.inventoried and mapped using a ground survey and remote sensing. Soil samples were collected and their physico.chemical properties analyzed according to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) standards. The soils were classified up to the family level. As a result of this study, 30 soil series belonging to ten sub.groups of five great groups and three sub.orders and orders each, were identified (classified to the family level) and mapped. Entisols, Inseptisols and Alfisols were the three orders, among which Entisols was the major one, occupying 75% of the area. Among the five great groups, Ustorthents occupied majority of the area (73%). Lithic Ustorthents and Typic Ustorthents were the two major sub.groups, occupying 40% and 26% of the total area, respectively. The present soil resource mapping of the Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu is a pioneer study, which yielded valuable information on the soil in this region.

지구상에서 가장 중요한 자원 중 하나인 토양은 지형조건에 따라 서로 다른 다양한 형태를 가지고 있기 때문에 최적화되고 지속 가능한 토양 자원의 활용을 위해서는 정확하고 포괄적인 정보가 필요하게 된다. 그러나 연구대상지역인 인도 Tamil Nadu지역의 경우 지형적인 영향으로 토양에 대한 정보가 많이 누락되어 있었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는Tamil Nadu 지역 Eastern Ghat의 Kolli Hill에 대한 지형 측량과 원격탐측을 통한 토양조사와 지도제작이 이루어졌으며 토양 샘플의 물리화학적 특성은 미국 농무부 (USDA) 기준에 따라 분석이 이루어졌다. 연구 결과로 토양을 5개의 대분류와 10개의 부분류로 구분할 수 있었으며 토양의 분포 특성을 보면 Entisol, Inseptisol 그리고 Alfisol의 세 계층 중 Entisol의 경우 전체 지역에 대하여 75%의 분포를 보였으며 5개의 대분류에 대해 Ustorthent 가 73% 로서 대부분 지역에 나타나고 있다. 또한 Lithic Ustorthents(40%), Typic Ustorthents(26%)의 분포를 나타내었다. 앞으로도 대상지역에 대한 토양자원에 대한 지속적인 연구가 요구되며 이를 통하여 토양에 대한 많은 정보를 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Census of India(2001). District Census Hand Book(p. 65‐75). Salem, Govt. of India.
  2. Dwivedi, R.S. and Sinha, A.K.(1999). Remote sensing application for Soils: Retrospective and Perspective, In Proc. ISRS National Symposium on "Remote sensing Application for Natural Resources Retrospective and Perspective"(pp.105‐119). Bangalore, India: Indian society of Remote Sensing and National Natural Resources Management System.
  3. Dwivedi, R.S.(1985).A multistage approach to mapping soil resources from remotely sensed data. Soil Survey and Land Evaluation, 5, 13‐18.
  4. Harikrishnan, M.(1977).Working plan for the Salem forest division(p. 75), Government of Tamil Nadu, India.
  5. Jayakumar, S., Samy, D.I.A. & Britto, J.S.(2002). Conserving forests in the Eastern ghats of through remote sensing and GIS – A case study in Kolli hills. Current Science, 82, 1259‐1267.
  6. Kalyanaraman, S., Rajangam, R.K. & Rattan, R.(1995). Indian Remote Sensing Spacecraft –1C/1D. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16, 791‐799. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169508954443
  7. Krishnamurthy, G. & Srinivasan, T.R.(1974). Interpretation of an Appollo space photo for small scale soil mapping in respect of an area in Bihar. Journal of the Indian Society of Photo‐Interpretation and Remote Sensing, 1&2, 75‐80.
  8. Mani, G.(1976). Report of the Investigation for Bauxite in Kolli Malai, Salem District, Tamil Nadu -Progress report for the field season 1975 - 76,(p.58‐90). Geological Survey of India, Tamil Nadu circle, Madras, India.
  9. NBSSLUP(1987), Laboratory Methods, National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land use Planning, Bulletin No.13, Indian Council of Agriculture Research, Nagpur, India.
  10. NBSSLUP(National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land use Planning. Retrieved February 1, 2008, from http://nbsslup.nic.in/RemoteSensing1.html.
  11. NRSA(1995). Integrated mission for sustainable development - Technical Guidelines, National Remote Sensing Agency, Department of Space, Government of India, Hyderabad, India.
  12. Prasad, N., Saran, S., Kushwaha, S.P.S. & Roy, P.S.(2001). Evaluation of various image fusion techniques and imaging scales for forest features interpretation. Current Science, 81, 1218‐1224.
  13. Ramachandran, A., Jayakumar, S., Haroon, R.M., Bhaskaran, A., & Samy, D.I.A.(2007). Carbon sequestration: estimation of carbon stork in natural forests using geospatial technology in the Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu, India. Current Science, 92, 323‐331.
  14. Rao, B.R.M., Fyze, M.A., Reddy, P.R., Reddy, G.S., Ravisankar, G. & Rao, D.P.(1996, December). Integrated approach for sustainable development, A case study from Banda District, Uttar Pradesh. (Paper presented at the Symposium on Remote Sensing for Natural Resources with Special Emphasis on Water Management, Pune, India.
  15. Rao, B.R.M., Ravi Sankar, T. & Venkataratnam, L.(1997, November). Soil suitability to groundnut crop; A GIS approach.(Paper presented at the National Symposium on Remote Sensing for Natural Resources with Special Emphasis on Infrastructure Development. Hyderabad, India).
  16. Raptis, V.S., Vaughan, R.A., Hatzopolous, I.N. & Papapanagiotou, V.(1998). The use of data fusion for the classification of dense urban environments, the Mytilene case.(In P. Gudmandsen(Ed.), Future Trends in Remote Sensing, (pp.435‐443). Rotterdam: Balkema.
  17. Ray, S.S.(2004). Merging of IRS LISS III and PAN data – evaluation of various methods for a predominantly agriculture area. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 2657‐2664. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160410001665821
  18. Reddy, R.S., Thayalan, S., Shivaprasad, C.R., Reddy, P.S.A. & Sehgal, G.H.(1990). Utility of satellite data for land evaluation in land use planning for a part of Northern Karnataka. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 18, 25‐27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030730
  19. Roundabush, R.D., Heriman, R.C., Barmore, R.L. & Schellintrager, G.W.(1985). Use of Landsat multispectral scanner data for soil survey in Arizona rangeland. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 40, 242–245.
  20. Samuel, D.M., Ratnam, C., Nayak, K.U., Khan, H.H., Balasubramaniam, R., Ramanathan, S., Solomon, I.B., Natanasabapathy, S. & Rajendran, G.(1975). Soil Survey of Namakkal Taluk, Salem District, Tamil Nadu, Soil Survey and Land Use Organization, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
  21. SGSWRDC(2001). Groundwater Perspectives: A Profile of Namakkal District, Tamil Nadu, State Ground and Surface Water Resources Data Centre, Water Resources Organization, Public Works Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, India.
  22. Singh, A.N. & Dwivedi, R.S.(1986). The utility of Landsat‐MSS as an integral part of database for small‐scale soil mapping. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 7, 1099‐1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168608948912
  23. Strahler, A. N., 1964. Quantitative Geomorphology of drainage basins and Channel networks. In: Ven Te Chew(Ed.), Hand book of Applied Hydrology. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York.
  24. Thompson, D.R., Henderson, K.E., Houstan, A.G. & Pitts, D.E.(1984). Variations in alluvial derived soils as measured by Landsat thematic mapper. Soil Sci. Soc. America J. 40, 137‐142.
  25. Venkataratnam, L.(1980). Use of remotely sensed data for soil mapping. Photo‐interpretation and Remote Sensing, 8, 19‐25.
  26. Ziadat, F.M., Taylor, J.C. & Brewer, T.R.(2003). Merging Landsat TM imagery with topographic data to aid soil mapping in the Badia region of Jordan. Journal of Arid Environments, 54, 527‐541. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.2002.1076