간호학 전공 여학생과 문과계 전공 여학생의 성 고정관념 비교

Comparison of Gender Stereotype between Female Nursing Students and Humanities Students

  • 투고 : 2009.05.09
  • 심사 : 2009.10.26
  • 발행 : 2009.12.31

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify difference in gender stereotype between female nursing students and humanities students. Methods: A descriptive comparative study was done. The subjects were 300 nursing students and 114 humanities students who were selected by convenient sampling. Data were collected from September 2008 to October 2008 using a constructive questionnaire with 30 questions, which was prepared for this study by modifying the instrument about gender stereotype developed by Kim. The data were analyzed through ANCOVA, factor analysis and Chronbach's.using the SPSS program. Results: 1) Of the six subcategories of gender stereotype, five were higher in the nursing students than in the humanities students, but occupational gender stereotype was not. 2) Age affected total, familiar, social, external, and intellectual gender stereotype. 3) Self-satisfaction and major satisfaction affected social gender stereotype. 4) In the analysis of difference in gender stereotype with controlling age, self-satisfaction and major satisfaction, the nursing students showed statistically significant higher scores in intellectual stereotype than the humanities students. Conclusion: Because female nursing students tended to show high gender stereotype, nursing educators need to develop programs for helping nursing students escape from gender stereotypes and increase their self-satisfaction.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alison, S. (1999). Hegel's theory of natural sexual relationships. Women's Philosophy Review, 22, 34-57.
  2. Anthony, A. S. (2004). Gender bias and discrimination in nursing education: Can we change it? Nursing Educator, 29 (3), 121-125. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006223-200405000-00011
  3. Basow, S. A. (1986). Gender stereotypes: Tradition and alternations, montrey. Califonia: Brooks & Cole Publishing Company.
  4. Cho, U., & Cho, S. K. (1994). Overwhelm strategy of gender unequality in labor market. Seoul: Korean Women's Developmental Institute.
  5. Cho, H., & Bang, H. J. (2003). Effects of gender stereotype on explicit and implicit self-constructs of Korean women. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 8(3), 101-122.
  6. Gender Statistics Information System (GSIS) (2007). Korean Women's Developmental Institute.
  7. Hong, S. J., Kim, M. J., Kim, A. Y., Kim, H. H., Park, Y. S., Bang, H. J., et al. (1998). Female Psychology. Seoul: Gyoyuk Gawhacsa.
  8. Kim, K. E., Byun, W. S., Mun, M. K., Park, S. M., & Hwang, J. M. (2007). Next government, Women Family Policy. 10 Theme, Korean.
  9. Kim, D. I. (1991). Gender stereotype of Korean, gender sociology. Seoul; Muneumsa.
  10. Kim, E. Y. (1991). A study on gender stereotypes, the influence of age and education factors on gender stereotypes. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  11. Kulik, L. (1999). Gendered personality disposition and gender role attitudes among Israeli students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136 (6), 736-747.
  12. Lee, D. J. (2004). The relationships among satisfaction in major, gender identity, and gender stereotypes of male nursing students. Unpublished master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul.
  13. Lee, M. O. (2003). The study on computer pornography, sex role stereotype, sexual attitude and physical contact in university students. Unpublished master's thesis, Kwandong University, Gangneung.
  14. Pak, Y. J. (2000). A study on college students' gender-role identity and its relationship to sex stereotype and self consciousness. Unpublished master's thesis, Sogang University, Seoul.
  15. Pyun, G. S. (2006). The effects of gender difference, emotional expression, role stereotype on leadership effectiveness. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul.
  16. Tak, J. K. (1995). Occupational sex stereotypes among Korean college students: Differences based on sex, sex-role type, and culture. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 161-174.