부부간의 사상체질 분포

Study on the Sasang Constitutional Difference between Married Men & Women

  • 김달래 (경희대학교 동서신의학병원 사상체질의학과) ;
  • 김선형 (경희대학교 동서신의학병원 사상체질의학과)
  • Kim, Dal-Rae (Dept. of Sasang constitutional medicine East west neo medical center, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Hyung (Dept. of Sasang constitutional medicine East west neo medical center, Kyung Hee University)
  • 발행 : 2009.07.31

초록

Objective: This study examined the distribution of married couples' Sasang constitutions. Method: This study was researched clinically using medical records of 206 married couples who visited the Kyung Hee University East-West neo medical center in Seoul between May of 2006 and June of 2008. Results: 1. When a man is So-yangin, his wife's Sasang constitutional type is So-yangin 7.7%, Tae-eumin 53.8%, So-eumin 38.5%. A Tae-eumin wife is significantly more common than the other two groups. 2. When a man is Tae-eumin, his wife's Sasang constitutional type is Tae-yangin 0.9%, So-yangin 53.9%, Tae-eumin 8.7%, So-eumin 36.5%. Proportion of So-yangin wife is significantly higher than the other three groups. 3. When a man is So-eumin, his wife's Sasang constitutional type is So-yangin 61.5%, Tae-eumin 29.2%, So-eumin 9.2%. A So-yangin wife is found at a significantly higher rate than the other two groups. Conclusion: A So-yangin man is most likely to marry a Tae-eumin woman. A Tae-eumin man is most likely to marry a So-yangin woman. A So-eumin man is most likely to marry a So-yangin woman.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ko BH. Ku DM, Kim KY, Kim DR, Park SS, Song IB etal. Sasang Medicine. jipmoondang. Seoul. 2005:418.
  2. Kim SJ. Daesan. The book of changes -the second volume . Daeyuhakdang. Seoul. 2001:89-105.
  3. Ko JH. Kim MY. The Relations among Personality Similarity, Reciprocity, Understanding and Liking in Adolescent Pairs. Korea Youth Consulting institute. 2004;12(1):53-64.
  4. Jo HD, Jang KY. Korean College Students' Evaluation of Self, Partner, and Preferred Types in Love Relationships Using MALPS. The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology. 2007;20(1):39-54.
  5. Ko JH, Pack YH. The effects of self and Spouse's Self-seteem, Communication Pattern, and Conflict Coping Behaviors on Marital Satisfaction. The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology. 2005;19(1):65-83.
  6. Acitelli LK. Kenny DA. The importance of similarity and understanding of partners' marital ideals to relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships. 2001;8:167-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00034.x
  7. Yun HK, Lee SH. The relationships among spouse's similarity of MBTI psychological types and marital communication, marital satisfaction. Journal of the Korea academy of sychological type. 2000;7:1-21.
  8. Keirsey D, Marilyn B. My style and My face. Institute of psychological tests. Seoul. 1999.
  9. Ko JH, Jun MJ. The Relation between Spouse Similarity and Marital Satisfaction An Analysis on Profile Similarity. The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology. 2003;17(3):1-16.
  10. Kim DR. The interesting story of Sasang Constitution. Central life cycle. Seoul. 2002:232-240.
  11. Baek YG. Sajujungsul. Myeongmundang Seoul. 1996:182-189.
  12. Hirsh S. Kummerow J. The type of personality type and life. Korea Institute of psychological tests. 1997.