한국한의학연구원논문집 (Korean Journal of Oriental Medicine)

한국한의학연구원 (Korean Institute of Oriental Medicine)
권호 표지

폄석(砭石)의 한반도 기원과 형성에 관한 연구

Archeological Quest on the Origin and Formation of the Stone Needle in the Korean Peninsula

  • 임용수 (원광대학교 한의과대학 경혈학교실) ;
  • 손인철 (원광대학교 한의과대학 경혈학교실) ;
  • 강연석 (원광대학교 한의과대학 의사학교실) ;
  • 김성철 (원광대학교 한의과대학 침구학교실) ;
  • 김재효 (원광대학교 한의과대학 경혈학교실)
  • 투고 : 2009.06.19
  • 심사 : 2009.08.14
  • 발행 : 2009.08.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: Much has been known that the systematical theory of acupuncture was developed from stone needle as therapeutic tools for orthopedic diseases in ancient times. Stone needle is very old therapeutic method like moxibustion and has been recognized that it was developed since the Stone Age in China so far. In the present study, it was examined for the origination and formation of stone needle based on stone relics of the Stone Age in Korean Peninsular, the medical and geographical literatures. Materials and methods: The facts of stone needle was examined and arranged on the ancient medical or geographical literatures such as The Yellow Emperor's Canon Internal Medicine, Shanhaijing as an ancient geographical book, etc. The clan societies and family related to an origination of stone needle was chased together with their cultural characteristics and origination. The stone relics which have been digged out of historic sites in the North-East Asia were examined for a relevance to stone needle. Results: In The Yellow Emperor's Canon Internal Medicine, it was referred to the stone needle that originated from a fishery zone related to the east coast district in North-East Asia. Through the examination of Shan Hai Jing as an ancient geographical book and its historical reviews, a Go-yi clan society who keep Go's family tree dealt well with the stone needle and jewels including jade in the North-East Asia before the publication periods of The Yellow Emperor's Canon Internal Medicine, and is comprised in the culture of Dong-yi clan society but not the Chinese culture. The obsidian stones, which have been digged out of historical sites in the North-East Asia since the Stone Age, are originated from volcanic areas combined with seashore that seems to be Baekdu mountain district in Korea and Kyushu district in Japan. Furthermore, obsidian stone tools which were found out at Laodung peninsula and the Korean peninsula are archeologically similar to the stone needle with regards to the shape, size and dual-use. In addition, specific obsidian stone tools have been used in orthopedic surgery as well-crafted obsidian blades have a cutting edge up to five times sharper than high-quality steel surgical scalpels. Conclusion: The origin of obsidian stone needle is well corresponded to the explanation about that of the stone needle. It is suggested that the stone needle which influenced in completion of acupuncture and Meridian theory in China seems to be an obsidian stone, and distribution of obsidian stone needle has been closely connected to Dong-yi clan society which are lived in the North-East Asia including Baekdu-mountain district.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Buck BA, Ancient technology in contemporary surgery, The Western journal of medicine, 1982;136(3):265–269.
  2. Green LA, (1997.09), "Surgeons use Stone Age technology for delicate surgery" The University Record, , (2009.07.01).
  3. Sharer RJ, Ashmore W, Archaology: Dicovering Our Past 3rd Ed., NY:McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2003.
  4. Tomas DH, Archaeology 2nd Ed., Ft. Worth: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1989.
  5. WIKIPEDIA, The Free Encyclopedia, "Obsidian", , (2009.07.01).
  6. World Health Organization, GUIDELINES FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH ON ACUPUNCTURE, WHO Regional Publications, Western Pacific Series No. 15. WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific. 1995.
  7. 高大倫. 玉器鑒賞․中國文物鑒賞叢書. 北京:漓江出版社. 1993.
  8. 廣東, 廣西, 湖南, 河南辭源修訂組. 商務印書館編輯部 編. 辭源縮印合訂本. 香港:商務印書館. 1987.
  9. 국립광주박물관, 선․원사인의 도구와 기술, 광주, 1994.
  10. 국립중앙박물관, 중앙박물관, 서울:통천문화사, 1996.
  11. 국립춘천박물관, 국립춘천박물관, 서울:통천문화사. 2002.
  12. 金富軾 撰, 이병도 역주, 열린데이터베이스연구원 집필, (CD-ROM)三國史記, 서울:누리미디어, 1999, , (2009.07.01).
  13. 김상태, 한반도 출토 흑요석기와 원산지 연구현황, 한국구석기학보, 2002;6:47-60.
  14. 김영주, 한민족의 뿌리와 단군조선사, 인천:桓雄출판사, 1987.
  15. 김원사, 덱타이트와 흑요석의 보석학적 특징비교-중국 광동 덱타이트와 백두산 흑요석을 중심으로-, 한국광물학회지, 2007;20(3):181-191.
  16. 동아대학교 박물관, 선사시대 흑요석제석기, , (2009.07.01).
  17. 柳承國, 동양철학연구, 서울:동양학술연구원, 1983.
  18. 孟競璧, 孟子敬, 砭石學, 北京:中醫古籍出版社, 2007.
  19. 苗威, 从高云家世看高句丽移民, 博物馆研究, 2009;1:38-43.
  20. 北京中醫藥學大學 中醫藥數字博物館, 醫史藏品 "砭石", , (2009.07.01).
  21. 李慶雨 譯, 黃帝內經靈樞, 서울:여강출판사, 2007.
  22. 李慶雨 譯, 黃帝內經靈樞, 서울:여강출판사, 2003.
  23. 李能和, 朝鮮醫藥發達史 (1), 조선총독부, 朝鮮, 1931;15(6):27-37.
  24. 이선복, 이용일, 흑요석 석기의 지화학적 특성에 대한 예비 고찰, 한국고고학보, 1996;35:173-187.
  25. 이정철, 우리나라 구석기유적 출토 흑요석의 원산지 연구 동향, 忠北史學, 2008;21:5-21.
  26. 이헌종, 이혜연, 우리나라 후기구석기시대인의 흑요석에 대한 전략적 활용에 대한 고찰, 지방사와 지방문화, 2005;8(1):7-34.
  27. 임숭경, 선사시대 옥기의 성격 및 그 제작기술에 대한 일고찰, 史林, 2003;20:127-71.
  28. 장순근, 망치를 든 지질학자, 서울:가람기획, 2001.
  29. 鄭在書, 山海經, 서울:민음사, 1985:143.
  30. 조경화 編, 漢文大辭典, 서울:경인문화사, 1981.
  31. 조남철, 박용희, 도성재, 강형태, 남인탁, 성분분석 및 자기적 특성에 의한 한반도 흑요석의 분류 연구, 보존과학회지, 2004;16:89-103.
  32. 조선유적 유물도감 편찬위원회, 조선 유적, 유물 도감, 평양:조선유적 유물도감 편찬위원회, 1989-1993.
  33. 周一謀 著, 김남일, 인창식 共譯, 고대 중국의학의 재발견, 서울:법인문화사, 2000.
  34. 中國大百科全書考古學編纂委員會 編, 文物, 辨玉, 北京:文物出版社, 1992.
  35. 中華文化息網, 百家姓, 百姓百说 "高", , (2009.07.01).陳壽 撰, 三國志(石版本), 史學會社刊寫, 1902.
  36. 최광식, 동북공정 이후 중국 연구서에 보이는 고구려․발해 인식, 先史와 古代, 2008;29:107-131.
  37. 崔容泰, 林鐘國, 李潤浩, 金賢濟 共譯, 最新針灸學, 서울:成輔社, 1979.
  38. 崔亨柱, 山海經, 서울:자유문고, 2004.
  39. 침코리아 의약사박물관, 上海中醫學院 醫史博物館 소장 "砭石, 骨針", , (2009.07.01).
  40. 황용훈, 신복순, 경희대학교 유적의 발굴조사:강원도, 강원대학교 박물관, 상무룡리: 파로호 퇴수지역 유적발굴 조사보고, 강원대학교 박물관 유적조사보고 第 8輯, 1989.