시민참여형 GIS를 위한 온톨로지 설계 및 구현

A Design and Implementation on Ontology for Public Participation GIS

  • 박지만 (지능형국토정보기술혁신사업단)
  • 발행 : 2009.06.30

초록

본 연구는 온톨로지 기반 시민참여형 GIS를 연구하였다. 최근에 온톨로지 기반 GIS는 의미적 의사소통을 위한 지리적 변수의 폭넓은 활용성과 유용한 지리적 지식을 추천하기 위한 수요에 따라 주목받고 있다. 그래서 이 연구는 시민참여형 GIS를 위한 실험적 시스템의 설계와 구현에 초점을 맞추었다. 실험적 시스템의 적용 가능성은 경기도 구리시의 역사관광을 대상으로 실험을 통해 확인하였다. 방법론 측면에서 지역상황과 사용자 인식에 연관된 생명주기모형은 공리를 통해 지리적 지식발견을 추천하고, 이는 주요한 사전절차단계(명세화, 개념화, 정규화, 통합과 구현)를 통해 가능하다. 이 연구의 온톨로지는 실용적 측면에서 추론을 통한 지리적 지식을 추천하였다. 더불어, 이 연구의 온톨로지 기반 시민참여형 GIS는 인식론적 접근과 존재론적 접근의 통합을 보여주고, 의미론적 의사소통과 연계된 지표를 제공하였다는 것에 의미가 있다. 실험적 시스템의 결과는 연구지역에서 시나리오의 형태로 적용하고, 이 모델은 인간 활동의 의미에서 논리적인 제약요소의 공리를 활용하였다.

This study investigates the ontology-based public participation GIS(PPGIS). The major reason that ontology-based GIS has attracted attention in semantic communication in recent year is due to the wide availability of geographical variable and the imminent need for turning such recommendation into useful geographical knowledge. Therefore, this study has been focused on designing and implementing the pilot tested system for public participation GIS. The applicability of the pilot tested was validated through a simulation experiment for history tourism in Guri city Gyeongi-do, Focused on the methodology, the life cycle model which involves regional statues and user recognition, can be viewed as an important preprocessing step(specification, conceptualization, formalization, integration and implementation) for recommended geographical knowledge discovery by axiom. Focusing on practicality, ontology in this study would be recommended for geographical knowledge through reasoning. In addition, ontology-based public participation GIS would show integration epistemological and ontological approach, and be utilized as an index which is connected with semantic communication. The results of the pilot system was applied to the study area, which was a part of scenario. The model was carried out using axiom of logical constraint in the meaning of human-activity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 박지만·황철수, 2008, '공간적 의사결정과정지원을 위한 온톨로지 연구, '지리학연구, 42(1), 1-13
  2. 염동훈, 1997, '안토니 기든스의 구조화 이론에 대한 방법론적 검토, '한국사회학, 31집, 671-698
  3. Bennet, B. and Cristani, M., 2004, Spatial Cognition and Computation: Special Issue on Spatial Vagueness, Uncertainty and Granularity, Lawrence Erlbaum Publisher
  4. Carver, S., 2003, The future of participatory approaches using geographic information: developing a research agenda for the 21st century, URISA Journal 15, Access and Participatory Approaches (APA), 61-71
  5. Florent, J. and Aurore, N., 2005, Post-experiment evaluation of the use of geographic in a public participatory process, URISA Journal, 17(1), 15-26
  6. Fonseca, F., 2001, Ontology-Driven Geographic Information Systems, Dissertation of Doctor of the University of Maine
  7. Fonseca, F. and Martin, J., 2004, Space and time in ecoontologies, AI Communications - The European Journal on Artificial Intelligence, 17(4), 259-269
  8. Fonseca, F. and Rodriguez, M. A., 2007, From geopragmatics to derivation ontologies: new directions for the geospatial semantic web, Transactions in GIS, 11(3), 313-416 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01047.x
  9. Gahegan, M., 2003, Geospatial Data mining and Knowledge Discovery, A UCGIS White Paper
  10. Gruber, T. R., 1993, A translation approach to portable ontology specifications, knowledge acquisition, 5(2), 199-220 https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008
  11. Hagerstrand, T., 1975, Space, Time, and Human Conditions, Dynamic Allocation of Urban Space, in Karqvist, A.(ed.), Lexington: Saxon House Lexington Books
  12. Hong, I. Y., 2006, Communal ontology of landmarks for urban regional navigation, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 41(5), 582-599
  13. Konisky, D. M. and Beierle, T., 2001, Innovations in public participation, environmental planning:examples from the great lakes gegion, Society and Natural Resources, 14(9), 815-826 https://doi.org/10.1080/089419201753210620
  14. Kingston, R., 2007, Public participation in local policy decision making: the role of web-based mapping, The Cartographic Journal, 44(2), 138-144 https://doi.org/10.1179/000870407X213459
  15. Lee, Y. W., 2007, A Semantic web services for tourism information over the mobile web, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 42(5), 788-807
  16. Luo, J., 2007, The Semantic Geospatial Problem solving Environment: An Enabling Technology for Geographical Problem Solving under Open, Heterogeneous Environments, Dissertation of Doctor of the Pennsylvania State University
  17. Marc, S. and Elliot, S., 2005, Delineating public and participation in PPGIS, URISA Journal, 16(2), 15-26
  18. Marc, E., 2007, Ontology Alignment: Bridging the Semantic Gap, Semantic Web and Beyond:Computing for Human Experience, Springer
  19. Michael, W., 2007, Antinomies of community, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, special issue, 29, 195-216
  20. Nyerges, T. and Jankowski, P., 2006, Participatory Geographic Information Science, in Ari-VeikkoAnttiroiko and Matti Malkia(eds.), Societies and Cities in the Age of Instant Access, Dordrecht, Springer, 331-342
  21. O’Looney, J., 2000, Beyond Maps: GIS and Decision making in Local Government, Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research institute, Inc
  22. OECD, 2003, Citizen as Partners: OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making, OECD
  23. Openshaw, S., 2006, Transformations - GIS Support: An Interdisciplinary Approach, NITLE publication, http://www.nitle.org
  24. Open Geospatial Consortium, 2006, Interoperability and Open Architectures: An Analysis of Existing Standardisation process and Procedures, Open Geospatial Consortium White Paper
  25. Ordnance Survey, 2007, Case Study: Semantic Web Technology at Ordnance Survey, http://www. ordnancesurvey.co.uk/ontology
  26. Shiffer, M., 1999, Geographic Interaction in the City Planning, Context: Beyond the Multimedia Prototype, in Nyerges, T., Mark, D., Laurini, R., and Egenhofer, M.(eds.), Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction for Geographic Information Systems, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 295-310
  27. W3C, 2004a, OWL Web Ontology Language Overview, W3C Recommendation
  28. W3C, 2004b, OWL Web Ontology Language Guide, W3C Recommendation
  29. W3C, 2004c, OWL Web Ontology Language Reference, W3C Recommendation