Journal of Korean Dental Science

Korean Academy of Dental Science (대한치의학회)
권호 표지

Evaluation of Survival Rate and Crestal Bone Loss of the Osstem GS II Implant System

  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dentistry Section, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Park, Ji-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dentistry Section, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Shen, Winston Tan Kwong (Oral and Maxillofacial Practice) ;
  • Carreon, Charlotte Ann Z. (University of the Philippines Manila)
  • Received : 2009.10.12
  • Accepted : 2009.11.03
  • Published : 2009.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The survival rate of the OSSTEM GS II Implant 1 year after serving the prosthetic function in 2 domestic and foreign medical institutes was 97.57%; the success rate was 95.7%, and the average alveolar bone resorption was 0.24mm(n=389). In particular, the alveolar bone resorption occurred differently according to the placement location as well as whether or not the patient underwent bone grafting operation, but the implant s length and diameter did not have significant impact on alveolar bone resorption.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrektsson, T., and Sennerby, L. State of the art in oral implants. J Clin Periodontol. 1991; 18:471-481.
  2. Lazzara, R., Siddiqui, A.A., Binon, P et al. Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3i endosseous dental implants placed over a 5-year period. Clin Oral Impl Res. 1996; 7:73-83. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070109.x
  3. Wyatt, C.C., and Zarb, G.A. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13:204-11.
  4. Lee, J.B., Wang, Y.S., Shin, K.H., and Hwang, B.N. Retrospective multicenter study of AVANA endosseous dental implant. J Korean Dental Assoc. 2000; 38: 558-566.
  5. van Steenberghe, D., Quirynen, M., and Naert, I. Survival and success rates with oral endosseous implants. Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontology, Berlin: Quintessence Publishing Co. 1999.
  6. Penarrocha, M., Palomar, M., Sanchis, J.M., et al. Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship with smoking, implant location, and morphology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19:861-867.
  7. Tada, S., Stegaroiu, R., Kitamura, E et al. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003; 18:357-368.
  8. Jovanovic, S.A., Spiekermann, H., and Richter, E.J. Bone regeneration around titanium dental implants in dehisced defect sites: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992; 7:233-245.
  9. Petrie, C.S., and Williams, J.L. Comparative evaluation of implant designs - influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16:486-494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01132.x