The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제1권2호
  • /
  • Pages.68-74
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear bond strength of composite resin to titanium according to various surface treatments

  • Lee, Seung-Yun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Vang, Mong-Sook (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yang, Hong-So (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Ha-Ok (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lim, Hyun-Pil (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Chonnam National University)
  • 발행 : 2009.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM. When veneering composite resin-metal restoration is prepared, the fact that bond strength between Ti and composite resin is relatively weak should be considered. PURPOSE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the shear bond strength between the veneering composite resin and commercial pure (CP) Ti / Ti-6Al-4V alloy according to the method of surface treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS. The disks were cast by two types of metal. Their surfaces were treated by sandblasting, metal conditioner, TiN coating and silicoating respectively. After surface treatment, the disks were veneered by composite resin (Tescera$^{TM}$, Bisco, USA) which is 5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in thickness. The specimens were stored in water at $25^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours, and then evaluated for their shear bond strength by universal testing machine (STM-$5^{(R)}$, United Calibration, USA). These values were statistically analyzed. RESULTS. 1. All methods of surface treatment were used in this study satisfied the requirements of ISO 10477 which is the standard of polymer-based crown and bridge materials. 2. The metal conditioner treated group showed the highest value in shear bond strength of CP Ti, silicoated group, TiN coated group, sandblasted group, in following order. 3. The silicoated group showed the highest value in shear bond strength of Ti-6Al-4V alloy, metal conditioner treated group, sandblasted group, TiN coated group, in following order. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this study, all methods of surface treatment used in this study are clinically available.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Staffnannous RS, Hembre JH, Rivers JA, Myers ML, Kilgore JL. Leakage study of three esthetic veneering materials. J Prosthet Dent 1989;54:204-6.
  2. Jones RM, Moore BK, Goodacre CJ, Munoz-Viveros CA. Microleakage and shear bond strength of resin and porcelain veneers bonds to cast alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:221-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90165-S
  3. Petridis H, Hirayama H, Kugel G, Habib C, Garefis P. Shear bond strength of techniques for bonding esthetic veneers to metal. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:608-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70062-4
  4. Mukai M, Fukui H, Hasegawa J. Relationship between sandblasting and composite resin-alloy bond strength by a silica coating. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:151-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80178-7
  5. Kelly JR, Rose TC. Nonprecious alloys for use in fixed prosthodontics: literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:363-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90279-2
  6. Barzilay I, Myers ML, Cooper LB, Graser GN. Mechanical and chemical retention of laboratory cured composite to metal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90001-7
  7. El-Sherif MH, El-Messery A, Halhoul MN. The effecs of alloy surface treatments and resins on the retention of resin bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:782. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80012-5
  8. Dunny JA, King GE. Minor connector designs for anterior acrylic resin bases: a preliminary study. J Prosthet Dent 1975;34:496-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(75)90035-9
  9. Brown DT, Desjardins RP, Chao EYS. Fatigue failure in acrylic resin retaining minor connectors. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:329-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90051-5
  10. Livaditis GJ. A chemical etching system for creating micromechanical retention in resin bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56;181-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90468-3
  11. Doukoudakis A, Cohen B, Tsoutsos A. A new chemical method for etching metal frameworks of the acid etched prothesis. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:421-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90267-8
  12. Zurasky JE, Duke ES. Improved adhesion of acrylic resins to base metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:520-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90028-X
  13. Tanaka T, Fujiyama E, Shimizu H, Tanaki A, Atsuta M. Surface treatment of nonprecious alloys for adhension-fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:456. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90176-9
  14. Barzilay I, Mayers ML, Cooper LB, Graser GN. Mechanical and chemical retention of laboratory cured composite to metal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:131-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90001-7
  15. Bahannan SA, Connelly ME, Mueninghoff LA. Application of silica coating technique for removable prosthodontics. A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90037-W
  16. Hansson O. Strength of bond with Comspan Opaque to three silicoated alloys and titanium. Scand J Dent 1990;98:248.
  17. ISO 10477. Dentistry - polymer-based crown and bridge materials. 2004(E).
  18. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:108-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00928.x
  19. Staffanou RS, Hembree JH Jr, Rivers JA, Myers ML. Abrasion resistance of three types of esthetic veneering materials. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:309-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90498-6
  20. Ameye C, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Conventional and microfilled composite resins. Part I: color and marginal adaptation. J prosthet Dent 1981;46:623-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90068-8
  21. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Zinelis S, Al-Dhamadi YA, Silikas N, Watts DC. In vitro characterization of two laboratory-processed resin composites. Dent Mater 2003;19:393-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00082-9
  22. Vojvodic D, Jerolimov V, Celebic A, Catovic A. Bond strength of silicoated and acrylic resin bonding system to metal. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:1-6.
  23. Yoshida K, Kamada K, Taira Y, Atsuta M. Effect of three adhesive primers on the bond strengths of four light-activated opaque resins to noble alloy. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:168-73. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00662.x
  24. Moffa JP. Biological effects of nickel-containing dental alloys. Council on dental materials, instruments and equiment. J Am Dent Assoc 1982;104:501-5. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1982.0223
  25. Ekstrand K, Ruyter IE, Oysad H. Adhesion to titanium of methacrylate-based polymer materials. Dent Mater 1988;4:111-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80002-2
  26. Matsumura H, Yoshida K, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Adhesive bonding of titanium with a titanate coupler and 4-META/MMATBB opaque resin. J Dent Res 1990;69:1614-1621. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690091601
  27. May KB, Van Putten MC, Bow DA, Lang BR. 4-META polymethyl methacrylate shear bond strength to titanium. Oper Dent 1997;22:37-40.
  28. Tanaka T, Kimoto K, Sawada T, Toyoda M. Shear bond strength of veneering composite resin to titanium nitride coating alloy deposited by radiofrequency sputtering. J Dent 2006;34:277-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.07.002
  29. Mezger PR, Creugers NH. Titanium nitride coatings in clinical dentistry. J Dent 1992;20:342-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(92)90021-4
  30. Steele JG, McCabe JF, Barnes IE. Properties of a titanium nitride coating for dental instruments. J Dent 1991;19:226-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(91)90123-G
  31. May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. The shear strength of polymethyl methacrylate bonded to titanium partial denture framework material. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:410-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90076-Z
  32. May KB, Fox J, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Silane to enhance the bond between polymethyl methacrylate and titanium. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:428-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80070-8

피인용 문헌

  1. Shear bond strength of indirect composite material to monolithic zirconia vol.8, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.267
  2. Shear Bond Strength of Different Repair Systems to Titanium After Water Aging vol.37, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.2341/11-231-l
  3. COMPARISON OF BOND STRENGTH OF COMMERCIALLY PURE TITANIUM AND NICKEL CHROMIUM ALLOY WITH THREE DIFFERENT LUTING CEMENTS: AN IN-VITRO STUDY vol.5, pp.45, 2009, https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2016/661