응용통계연구 (The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics)

  • 제22권3호
  • /
  • Pages.667-676
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1225-066X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-5818(eISSN)
한국통계학회 (The Korean Statistical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

응답 거부와 부재율이 무응답 오차에 미치는 영향: 경제활동인구조사를 중심으로

The Effect of Survey Refusal and Noncontact on Nonresponse Error: For Economically Active Population Survey

  • 발행 : 2009.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문은 조사원이 기록한 가구의 현장방문내용을 분석함으로써 응답자의 부재(noncontact)와 거부(refusal)가 무응답 오차에 미치는 영향을 살피고자 한다. 통계 자료의 품질은 무응답률과 무응답 오차에 의해 결정되고, 응답률은 통계자료의 신뢰성 평가를 위한 척도로 사용되기도 한다. 가구를 대상으로 하는 조사에서 무응답 유형은 크게 부재와 거부의 형태로 나뉘고, 이들 무응답 유형이 무응답 오차에 미치는 영향은 다르다. 이에 본 논문은 무응답 유형에 따른 무응답 편향을 측정하고, 무응답 오차에 영향을 미치는 가구의 무응답 유형을 찾는데 그 목적이 있다.

This study investigates the effect of survey refusal and noncontact on the nonresponse error in the household survey. For this purpose we analyzed the data of the interviewer's field work report. The survey data quality is affected by nonresponse rate and nonresponse error, and also nonresponse rate measures the reliability of the survey data. The household survey mainly contains two types of nonresponses of refusals and noncontacts. These refusals and noncontacts have different effect on the nonresponse error. This could be a venue for future research interested in decreasing the error due to noncontacts and refusals.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김재광 (2008). <표본조사론>, 자유아카데미
  2. 조사통계연구회 (2000). <무응답 오차>, 자유아카데미
  3. 통계청 (2007). <가구부문 표본개편 결과 2007>, p.6
  4. Alreck, L. P. and Settle, R. (1995). The Survey Research Handbook, Wiley John & Sons, New York
  5. Babbie, E. (2007). The Practice of Social Research, 11th ed., Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont
  6. Curtin, R., Presser, S. and Singer, E. (2000). The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment, Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 413-428 https://doi.org/10.1086/318638
  7. De Leeuw, E. and De Heer, W. (2001). Trends in Households Survey Non-Response: A Longitudinal and International Comparison, In Survey Non-Response, Wiley John & Sons, New York, 41-54
  8. Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys, Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 646-675 https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl033
  9. Groves, R. M. and Couper, M. P. (1998). Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys, Wiley John & Sons, New York
  10. Groves, R. M., Presser, S. and Dipko, S. (2004). The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions, Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 2-31 https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh002
  11. Heerwegh, D., Abts, K. and Loosveldt, G. (2007). Minimizing survey refusal and noncontact rates: Do our efforts pay off?, Survey Research Methods, 1, 3-10
  12. Keeter, S., Miller, C., Kohut, A., Groves, R. M. and Presser, S. (2000). Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a telephone survey, Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 125-148 https://doi.org/10.1086/317759
  13. Lynn, P., Clarke, P., Martin, P. and Sturgis, P. (2002). The effects of extended interviewer [eeorts on nonresponse bias, In R. Groves, D.Dillman, J.Eltinge and R.Little (Eds.), survey nonresponse. 135-147, Wiley, New York
  14. Mayer, C. S. and Pratt, Jr. R. W. (1996). A note on nonresponse in a mail survey, Public Opinion Quartely, 30, 637-646 https://doi.org/10.1086/267461
  15. Singleton, R. and Straits, B. (2005). Approaches to Social Research, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, New York
  16. Stoop, I. (2005). Nonresponse in Sample Survey. The Hunt for the Last Respondent, The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office

피인용 문헌

  1. Analysis of Missing Data Using an Empirical Bayesian Method vol.27, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2014.27.6.1003