Consumers' Purchasing Intentions of Organic Foods in relation to the Perceived Health Concerns, Healthy Eating Practices and Attitudes, and Food Choice Motives

소비자의 건강염려, 건강지향적인 식습관 및 태도, 식품선택 동기가 유기식품의 구매의도에 미치는 영향

  • Cha, Myeong-Hwa (Department of Home Economics Education, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Yoo-Kyeong (Department of Home Economics Education, Kyungpook National University)
  • Published : 2009.06.30

Abstract

This study investigated the correlations of five constructs - health concerns, healthy eating practices and attitudes, food choice motives, attitudes toward organic foods - in the formation of behavioral to the purchasing intentions of organic foods. An instrument encompassing health perception, attitudes, habits and personal traits was developed through the comprehensive reviews of the literature and the assured validity and internal reliability of the contents. The questionnaire was administered to the students of three universities at Daegu, Kyungpook province. A total of 288 questionnaires were collected for a response rate of 96.0%. The correlations of five constructs and purchasing intention were tested simultaneously using structural equation modeling. Healthy eating practices and attitudes toward organic foods were found to be the determinants which directly influence the intention to purchase organic foods. Health concerns didn't show direct relation to the purchasing intention of organic foods. The hypothesized path from the health concerns to the purchasing intentions was not supported. The results indicated that food choice motives and healthy eating attitudes should be managed to achieve higher behavioral intention to purchase organic foods.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajzen I, Madden TJ (1986): Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J Experimental Social Psychology 22: 453-474 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
  2. Bae BR (2007): The understanding and Application of structural equation model. p. 198 Daekyung Press Kyungsan
  3. Bae KG (2006): Current situation of agricultural organic products and organic processing food. Food Science and Industry 39(3): 35-51
  4. Bredahl L (2001): Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods-results of a cross-national survey. J Consumer Policy 24(1): 23-61 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010950406128
  5. Cha DU (2007): Analysis of purchasing behavior of consumers regarding natures of organic agricultural products. Korean J Agricultural Management and Policy 34(2): 197-218
  6. Chen MF (2007): Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions in relation to organic foods in Taiwan: Moderating effects of foodrelated personality traits. Food Quality and Preference 18(7): 1008-1021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.004
  7. Conner MT (1993): Individualised measurement of attitudes towards foods. Appetite 20: 235-238 https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1993.1026
  8. Cox DN, Koster A, Russell CG (2004): Predicting intentions to consume functional foods and supplements to offset memory using an adaptation of protection motivation theory. Appetite 43(1): 55-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.02.003
  9. Cunningham R (2001): The organic consumer profile: Not only who you think it is! Strategic Information Services Unit, Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Alberta http://www1.agric.gov.ab. ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/sis4930/$file/organic_profile.pdf?OpenElement accessed at May 15, 2009
  10. Frust T, Connors M, Bisogni CA, Sobal J, Winter-Falk L (1996): Food choice: a conceptual model of the process. Appetite 26(3): 247-266 https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1996.0019
  11. Grankvist G, Biel A (2001): The importance of beliefs and purchase criteria in the choice of eco-labeled food products. J Environmental Psychology 21(4): 405-410 https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0234
  12. Kearney JM, Gibney MJ, Livingstone MB, Robson PJ, Kiely M, Harrington KE (2001): Attitudes towards and beliefs about nutrition and health among a random sample of adults in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Public Health Nutr 4(5): 1117-1126 https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2001193
  13. Kim ND (2008): Trend Korea 2009. p. 87 Future Window Seoul
  14. Lindeman M, Vaananen M (2000): Measurement of ethical food choice motives. Appetite 34(1): 55-59 https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1999.0293
  15. Magnusson MK, Arvola A, Koivist Hursti UK, Aberg L, Sjoden PO (2001): Attitudes towards organic foods among Swedish consumers. British Food Journal 103(3): 209-226 https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700110386755
  16. Moon W, Balasubramanian SK (2003): Willingness to pay for non- GM foods in the US and UK. J Consumer Affairs 37: 317-339 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2003.tb00456.x
  17. Moorman C, Matulich E (1993): A model of consumers' preventive health behaviors : the role of health motivation and health ability. J Consumer Research 20(2): 208-228 https://doi.org/10.1086/209344
  18. NamKung S, Lee JY, Kim KD (2007): A study on the recognition of organic food of housewives in Seoul area. Korean J Food Preservation 14(6): 676-680
  19. Nestle M, Wing R, Birch L, DiSogra L, Drewnowski A, Middleton S, Sigman-Grant M, Sobal J, Winston M, Economos C (1998): Behavioural and social influences on food choice. Nutr Rev 56: 50-74 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1998.tb01732.x
  20. Poulsen JB (1999): Danish consumers' attitudes towards functional foods. Working paper no 62, MAPP, A rhus, Denmark
  21. Saba A, Di Natale R (1998): Attitudes, intention and habit: Their role in predicting actual consumption of fats and oils. J Human Nutr Diet 11(1): 21-32 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-277X.1998.00078.x
  22. Saba A, Di Natale R (1999): A study on the mediating role of intention in the impact of habit and attitude on meat consumption. Food Quality Preference 10(1): 69-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00039-1
  23. Saba A, Vassallo M, Turrini A (2000): The role of attitudes, intentions, habit in predicting actual consumption of fat containing foods in Italy. European J Clin Nutr 54(7): 540-545 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601051
  24. Steptoe A, Pollard TM, Wardle J (1995): Development of a measure of the motive underlying the selection of food: The food Choice Questionnaire. Appetite 25(3): 267-284 https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1995.0061
  25. Sun YHC (2008): Health concern, food choice motives, and attitudes toward healthy eating: The mediating role of food choice motives. Appetite 51(1): 42-49 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.11.004
  26. Sorensen E, Grunert KG, Nielsen NA (1996): The impact of product experience, product involvement and verbal processing style on consumers’ cognitive structures with regard to fresh fish. MAPP working paper no. 42, The Aarhus School of Business. Aarhus, Denmark
  27. Urala N, Lähteenmäki L (2003): Reasons behind consumers’ functional food choice. Nutrition and Food Science 33(4): 148-158 https://doi.org/10.1108/00346650310488499
  28. Urala N, Lähteenmäki L (2004): Attitudes behind consumers' willingness to use functional foods. Food Quality and Preference 15(7): 793-803 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.02.008
  29. Verbeke W (2005): Consumer acceptance of functional foods: sociodemographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants. Food Quality Preference 16(1): 45-57 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.01.001
  30. Verbeke W, Vackier I (2005): Individual determinants of fish consumption : application of the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite 44(1): 62-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.08.006
  31. Vickers ZM (1993): Incorporating tasting into a conjoint analysis of taste, health claim, price and brand for purchasing strawberry yoghurt. J Sensory Studies 8(4): 341-352 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1993.tb00224.x
  32. Williams PRD, Hammit JK (2001): Perceived risks of conventional and organic produce. Risk Analysis 21(2): 319-330 https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.212114
  33. You SY, Yin H (2008): A study of consumer attitude and purchasing behavior toward organic food and genetically modified food. Korean J Agricultural Management Policy 35(1): 141-164