Basic Seed Stock Maintenance and Multiplication in Indian Tropical Tasar Silkworm Antheraea mylitta Drury-A Strategic Approach

  • Published : 2009.06.30

Abstract

Daba ecorace of Antheraea mylitta Drury (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae), the semi domesticated Indian tropical tasar silkworm being reared outdoor; the egg and silk yields are dependent of genotype environment interaction. The insufficient maintenance and multiplication of its P4 seed stock need a coherent as well as scientific strategy to safeguard breed potential, being commercially applied ecorace. The sort-out lines of P4 stock studied over five generations highlighting on commercial trait up gradation suits for a tropical crop season, revealed enhanced performance. The line with high pupal parents (T2) shown improved fecundity (12.9%) and the line with high shell parents (T3) recorded higher shell weight (40.0%) and silk ratio (24.1%). While, the line of high pupal female and high shell male (T4) reveal enhancement in fecundity (9.0%), egg hatching (14.1%), shell weight (50.0%), silk ratio (35.2%) and absolute silk yield (52.0%) indicating the need and role of varied basic seed stock lines. The approach could improve economically vital egg fecundity and cocoon shell weights besides balancing them in same line for commercial operation. The progressive show of lines (T1 to T4) along successive generations (G1 to G5), in spite of passing through seed crop (Jul-Aug) and commercial crop (Sep-Nov) seasons emphasize their compatibility. The study infers that the strategic plan of combining preferred parental phenotypes, methodical selection for desired commercial trait(s) through generations with best possible genotype environment interaction has enriched P4 stock with elevation in needy trait(s) besides assuring choice of suitable lines for seasons and regions and timely replenishment of basic seed of Daba ecorace.

Keywords

References

  1. Benchamin KV (2002) Strategies for improvement of silkworm seed quality. Indian Silk 41(8), 05-08
  2. Bhat DV, Gopal DM, Basavaraj HK, Ahsan MM, Datta RK (1996) Basic stock multiplication at P4 level. Indian Silk 34(11), 11-15
  3. Datta RK, Basavaraja HK, Mano Y (1996) Manual on bivoltine rearing: race maintenance and multiplication. Central Sericultural Research & Training Institute, Central Silk Board, Mysore, India
  4. Ghosh MK, Babu CM, Ponnuvel KM, Srivastava RC (1996) Correlation between female moth weight and fecundity in the oak tasar silkworm, Antheraea proylei J, Sericologia 36(3), 561-564
  5. Jong DG, Bijma P (2002) Selection and phenotypic plasticity in evolutionary biology and animal breeding. Livest Prod Sci 78, 195-214 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00096-9
  6. Kumar NS, Basavaraja HK, Joge PG, Kalpana GV, Malreddy N (2008) Heterosis studies on hybrids of cocoon color sexlimited breed of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. under different environments of temperature. J Entomol Res Soc 10(1), 1-12
  7. Malik FA, Reddy YS (2007) Role of mulberry nutrition on manifestation of post cocoon characters of selected races of the silkworm Bombyx mori L. Sericologia 47(1), 63-76
  8. Mulder HA, Bijma P (2005) Effects of genotype × environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs. J Anim Sci 83, 49-61 https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.83149x
  9. Munoz MFC, Tonhati H, Costa CN, Sarmiento DR, Echeverri DM (2004) Factors that cause genotype by environment interaction and use of a multiple-trait herd-cluster model for milk yield of Holstein cattle from Brazil and Colombia. J Dairy Sci 87(8), 2687-2692 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73395-0
  10. Narain R, Rath SS, Negi BBS, Nagendra S, Kulshrestha V, Prasad BC, Sinha BRRPD, Thangavelu K (2001) Integrated package for seed cocoon preservation and seed production in Antheraea mylitta D. Indian Silk 40(6), 15-17
  11. Narain R, Rath SS, Prasad BC, Alam MO, Rath PC, Mishra D, Satpathy S, Ojha NG (2004) Integrated package for tasar seed cocoon production and preservation. Indian Silk 42(11), 17-18
  12. Nayak BK, Dash AK, Patro KBG (2000) Biodiversity conservation of wild tasar silk moth Antheraea paphia Linn. of Simlipal biosphere reserve and strategy for its economic utilization. Int J Wild Silkmoth and Silk 5, 367-370
  13. Raju PJ (1999) Present and future perspectives in silkworm breeding research. Indian Silk 38(2), 11-14
  14. Sahu AK, Kumar N, Das PK (1997) Status of Muga seed sector. Indian Silk 35(12), 29-32
  15. Senapati MD, Benchamin KV, Brahma KC (2001) Stock maintenance in Antheraea assama WW- A new concept. Indian silk 40(8), 26-28
  16. Singh R, Chaturvedi HK, Datta RK (1994) Fecundity of mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mori L in relation to female cocoon weight and repeated matings. Indian J Seric 33(1), 70-71
  17. Sinha SS, Sinha AK (1994) Conservation strategies for important wild silkmoth population of Antheraea mylitta Drury (Lepidoptera : Saturniidae). Int J Wild Silkmoth and Silk 2, 159-162
  18. Sinha AK, Srivastava AK, Sinha BRRPD, Thangavelu K (2001) Direct and indirect effects of quantitative characters on silk yield in eight inbred lines of Antheraea mylitta Drury. Pers Cytol Genet 10, 849-852
  19. Suryanarayana N, Kumar R, Gargi (2005) Monograph on Indian tropical tasar silkworm food plants, Central Tasar Research and Training Institute, Ranchi, India
  20. Suryanarayana N, Srivastava AK (2005) Monograph on Tropical tasar silkworm, Central Tasar Research and Training Institute, Ranchi, India
  21. Thangavelu K (2002) Future research strategy for non-mulberry sericulture with particular reference to tasarculture:Advances in Indian sericulture research. In proceedings of the National conference on strategies for sericulture research and development, Dandin S.B. and V.P. Gupta (Eds.), pp.365-368, Central Sericultural Research & Training Institute, Central Silk Board, Mysore, India
  22. Yamaguchi A (2001) Future directions of bivoltine silkworm breeding in India. Indian Silk 39(9), 26-28
  23. Zhao Y, Chen K, He S (2007) Key principles for breeding spring - and - autumn silkworm varieties: from our experience of breeding 873 $\times$ 874. Casp. J Env Sci 5(1), 57-61