Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society (한국경영과학회지)

The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society (한국경영과학회)
권호 표지

The Relationship of Privacy Violation and Psychological Distance in Korean Ubiquitous Government Service

한국 유비쿼터스 정부 서비스에서의 사생활 침해와 심리적 거리와의 관계

  • Published : 2009.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Today the u-government services are becoming more personalized and intelligent. For the successful implementation of personalization, individual user's privacy concerns must be respected and taken care of. Based on the empirical survey results, this research summarizes the reluctance to the government's use of private information using six categories. We measure user's psychological distance toward e-government using the four levels, adopting the suggestions by the Proxemics. Since a positive correlation is Identified between people's psychological Intimacy toward e-government and their tolerance to the use of private Information, the amount and/or types of private information should be sequentially used in personalization systems. Initially allowing the least intolerable private information such as occupation information, the personalization system should additionally use the next tolerable Information such as health information or service request/interest information, as user's psychological distance toward government services becomes shorter.

Keywords

References

  1. Alford, J., 'Defining the client in the public sector: a social-exchange perspective,' Public Administration Review, Vol.62, No.3(2002), pp.337-346 https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00183
  2. Allen, C., D. Kania, and B. Yaeckel, Internet world guide to one-to-one web marketing, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1998
  3. Andrade, E.B., V. Kaltcheva, and B. Weitz, 'Self-disclosure on the web: the impact of privacy policy, reward, and company reputation,' Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.29, No. 1(2002), pp.350-353
  4. Anttiroiko, A.V., 'Towards ubiquitous government : the case of Finland,' e-Service Journal, Vol.4, No.1(2005), pp.65-99 https://doi.org/10.2979/ESJ.2005.4.1.65
  5. Bailenson, J,N., J, Blascovich, A.C. Beall, and J,M. Loomis, 'lnterpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments,' Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol.29, No.7 (2003), pp.819-833 https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029007002
  6. Belanger, F., L.D. Carter, and L.C. Schaupp, 'U-Government : a framework for the evolution of e-government,' Electronic Government-Inderscience, Vol.2, No.4(2005), pp.427-445
  7. Berners-Lee, T., J, Hendler, and O. Lassila, The semantic web, Scientific American, 2001
  8. Cederquist, J,G., R.J, Corin, M.A.C. Dekker, S. Etalle, den Hartog, J.I., and G. Lenzini, 'Audit-based compliance control,' International Journal of Information Security, Vol.6, No.2-3 (2007), pp.133-151 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-007-0017-y
  9. Chellappa, R.K. and R.G. Sin, 'Personalization versus privacy : an empirical examination of the online consumer's dilemma,' Information Technology and Management, Vol.6(2005), pp.181-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-005-5879-y
  10. Clarke, R.A, 'Information technology and dataveillance,' Communications of the ACM, Vol.31, No.5(1998), pp.498-512 https://doi.org/10.1145/42411.42413
  11. Culnan, M.J., 'Protecting privacy online : is self-regulation working?,' Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol.19, No.1(2000), pp.20-26 https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.19.1.20.16944
  12. Emmers-Sommer, T.M., 'The effects of communication quality and quantity indicators on intimacy and relational satisfaction,' Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol.21, No.3(2004), pp.399-411 https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504042839
  13. Fletcher, G.J,O. and L.A. Kininmonth, 'Measuring relationship beliefs : an individual differences scale,' Journal of Research in Personality, Vol.26, No.4(1992), pp.371-397 https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(92)90066-D
  14. Friedman, B., P.H. Kahn, and D.C. Howe, 'Trust online,' Communications cf the ACM, Vol.43, No.12(2000), pp.34-40 https://doi.org/10.1145/355112.355120
  15. Gartner, Government in 2020 : taking the long view, December 2005
  16. Gartner, Case study : Florida court are first to integrate criminal justice information statewide, May 2007
  17. Hall, E.T., The hidden dimension, Doubleday, Garden City, New York, 1966
  18. Hansen, H., 'Antecedents to consumers' disclosing intimacy with service employees,' Journal of Services Marketing, Vol.17, No.6 (2003), pp.573-588 https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040310495618
  19. Ho, A.T.K., 'Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative,' Public Administration Review, Vol.62, No.4(2002), pp.434-444 https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00197
  20. Hook, M.K., L.H. Gerstein, L. Detterich, and B. Gridley, 'How close are we? Measuring intimacy and gender differences,' Journal of Counseling and Development, Vol.81, No.4 (2003), pp.462-472 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2003.tb00273.x
  21. Ickinger, W.J. and Morris, S., Psychological characteristics and interpersonal distance, Tulane University, 2001
  22. ITU., 'Ubiquitous network societies: the case of Japan,' International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Document UNS/07, April 2005
  23. Lee, H.J., 'Future ubiquitous government evolution: Government 3.0,' Ubiquitous Society Research Series (Korean), Vol.29(2007), pp.1-15
  24. Li, N., J. Mitchell, and W. Winsborough, Design of a role-based trust-management framework., in M. Abadi and S.M. Bellovin, editors, Proceedings of the Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society Press, 2002, pp.114-130
  25. Manber, U., A Patel, and J. Robison, 'Experience with personalization on Yahoo!,' Communications of the ACM, Vol.43, No.8 (2000), pp.35-39 https://doi.org/10.1145/345124.345136
  26. McKenna, R., 'Real-time marketing,' Harvard Business Review, July-August(1995), pp.87-95
  27. McMillen, D., 'Privacy, confidentiality, and data sharing: issues and distinctions,' Government Information Quarterly, Vol.21(2004), pp.359-382 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2004.05.001
  28. Miline, G.R. and M.E. Gordon, 'Direct mail privacy-efficiency trade-offs within an implied social contract framework,' Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol.12, No.3 (1993), pp.206-215
  29. Moon, Y.M., 'Intimate exchange: using computers to elicit self disclosure from consumers,' Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.26 (2000), pp.323-339 https://doi.org/10.1086/209566
  30. Moon, Y.M., 'Don't blame the computer:when self-disclosure moderates the self-serving bias,' Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vo1.12, No.1/2(2003), pp.125-137
  31. Oden, T.C., Game free: A guide to the meaning of intimacy, Harper and Row, New York, New York, 1974
  32. O'Neil, D., 'Analysis of Internet users' level of online privacy concerns,' Social Science Computer Review, Vol.19, No.1(2001), pp.17-31 https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900103
  33. Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler, Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector, Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, 1992
  34. Pang, L.C. and D.F. Norris, 'Applying customer relationship management (CRM) to government,' Journal if Government Financial Management, Vol.51 , No.1 (2002), pp.40-44
  35. Peppers, D. and M. Rogers, The one to one future : building relationships one customer at a time, Doubleday, New York, New York, 1997
  36. Perlman, D. and E. Fehr, The development of intimate relationships, in : D. Perlman, S. Duck (Ed), Intimate Relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration, Sage, Newbury Park, California, 1987, pp.13-42
  37. Phelps, J., G. Novak, and E. Ferrell, 'Privacy concerns and consumers willingness to provide personal information,' Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol.19(2000), pp.27-41 https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.19.1.27.16941
  38. Pieterson, W., W. Ebbers, and J Dijk, 'Person-alization in the public sector : an inventory of organizational and user obstacles towards personalization of electronic services in the public sector,' Government Information Quarterly, Vol.24(2007), pp.148-164 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.12.001
  39. Reis, H.T. and P. Shaver, Intimacy as an interpersonal process, in : S. Duck (Ed), Handbook of personal relationships : Theory, Research, and Interventions, Chichester, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1988, pp.367-390
  40. Rennhard, M., S. Rafaeli, L. Mathy, B. Plattner, and D. Hutchinson, 'Towards pseudonymous e-commerce,' Electronic Commerce Research, Vol.4(2004), pp.83-111 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ELEC.0000009283.82564.25
  41. Rezgui, A., A. Bouguettaya, and M.Y. Eltoweissy, 'Privacy on the web: facts, challenges, and solutions,' IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine, Vol.1, No.6(2003), pp.40-49 https://doi.org/10.1109/MSECP.2003.1253567
  42. Roy Morgan Research, Privacy and the community, 2004, [Online] Available: http://www.privacy.gov.au/publications/rcommunity.rtf
  43. Schedler, K. and J. Felix, 'Quality in public management: the customer perspective,' International Public Management Journal, Vol.1, No.3(2000), pp.125-143 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7494(00)00031-3
  44. Schedler, K. and L. Summermatter, 'Customer orientation in electronic government : motives and effects,' Government Information Quarterly, Vol.24(2007), pp.291-311 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.05.005
  45. Scott, V.M., K.E. Mottarella, and M.J. Lavooy, 'Does virtual intimacy exist? A brief exploration into reported levels of intimacy in online relationships,' Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Vol.9, No.6(2006), pp.759-761 https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.759
  46. Stem, B.B., 'Advertising intimacy: relationship marketing and the services consumer,' Journal of Advertising, Vol.26, No.4(1997), pp.7-19 https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1997.10673532
  47. Volokh, E., 'Personalization and privacy,' Communications of the ACM, Vol.43, No.8, 2000, pp.84-88 https://doi.org/10.1145/345124.345155
  48. Wang, H., M.K.O. Lee, and C. Wang, 'Consumer privacy concerns about Internet marketing,' Communications of the ACM, Vol.41, No.3(1998), pp.63-70 https://doi.org/10.1145/272287.272299
  49. White, T.B. Deciding to reveal: consumer disclosure management in consumer/seller relationship, Doctoral dissertation, Duke University, 1999