Synthesis of 2-Thio-4-aminopyrimidine Derivatives as Anti-cancer Agent

  • Lee, Sang-Hyo (Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Keimyung University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Ho (Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Keimyung University)
  • Published : 2009.06.30

Abstract

The screening of the anti-cancer activity of the chemical library provided 2-thio-4-aminopyrimidine as the initial hit. The confirmation of structure and biological effect of hit was performed by synthesis and biological evaluation. The optimization of hit was performed by derivatization of substituents while keeping the core structure. The evaluation of growth inhibitory activity was carried out using SRB assay against 6 human cancer cell lines and human fibroblast. The growth inhibitory activity of compounds showed substituent dependency and more than 5 compounds showed complete growth inhibition of cancer cell lines at 10 ${\mu}M$ concentration. Chemical library screening followed by synthetic modification provided possibility that 2-thio-4-aminopyrimidine can be used as a new scaffold for the development of anti-cancer agent.

Keywords

References

  1. Fricker SP, Buckley RG. Comparison of two colorimetric assays as cytotoxicity endpoints for an in vitro screen for antitumour agents. Anticancer Res. 1996. 16: 3755-3760.
  2. Hua DH, Lou K, Battina SK, Zhao H, Perchellet EM, Wang Y, Perchellet JP. Syntheses, molecular targets and antitumor activities of novel triptycene bisquinones and 1,4-anthracenedione analogs. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2006. 6: 303-318. https://doi.org/10.2174/187152006777698141
  3. Li W, Lam MS, Birkeland A, Riffel A, Montana L, Sullivan ME, Post JM. Cell-based assays for profiling activity and safety properties of cancer drugs. J Pharmacol Toxicol Meth. 2006. 54: 313-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2006.02.014
  4. Marshall L. The Cancer Outlook 2000, Datamonitor PLC, London.
  5. Papazisis KT, Geromichalos GD, Dimitriadis KA, Kortsaris AH. Optimization of the sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay. J Immunol Meth. 1997. 208: 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1759(97)00137-3
  6. Pauwels B, Korst AE, de Pooter CM, Pattyn GG, Lambrechts HA, Baay MF, Lardon F, Vermorken JB. Comparison of the sulforhodamine B assay and the clonogenic assay for in vitro chemoradiation studies. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003. 51: 221-226.
  7. Seo HY, Kim YD, Lee KM, Min AK, Kim MK, Kim HS, Won KC, Park JY, Lee KU, Choi HS, Park KG, Lee IK. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced activation of activating transcription factor 6 decreases insulin gene expression via up-regulation of orphan nuclear receptor small heterodimer partner. Endocrinology 2008. 149: 3832-3841. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2008-0015
  8. Valler MJ, Green D. Diversity screening versus focused screening in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 2000. 5: 286-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(00)01517-8
  9. Weinstein JN, Buolamwini JK. Molecular targets in cancer drug discovery: cell-based profiling. Curr Pharm Des. 2000. 6: 473-483.
  10. WHO Fact sheet ${N^{\circ}}$ 297 (2009) http://www.who.int/mediacentre/ factsheets/fs297/en/