Health Policy and Management (보건행정학회지)

Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management (한국보건행정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors affecting satisfaction in National Cancer Screening Program

국가암조기검진 수검자 만족도에 영향을 미치는 요인

  • Yoon, Nan-He (National Cancer Control Research Institute, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Kwon, Soon-Man (Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Hoo-Yeon (National Cancer Control Research Institute, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Park, Eun-Cheol (National Cancer Control Research Institute, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Choi, Kui-Son (National Cancer Control Research Institute, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Kwak, Min-Son (National Cancer Control Research Institute, National Cancer Center)
  • 윤난희 (국립암센터 국가암관리사업단) ;
  • 권순만 (서울대학교 보건대학원) ;
  • 이후연 (국립암센터 국가암관리사업단) ;
  • 박은철 (국립암센터 국가암관리사업단) ;
  • 최귀선 (국립암센터 국가암관리사업단) ;
  • 곽민선 (국립암센터 국가암관리사업단)
  • Published : 2009.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the satisfaction of participants in the National Cancer Screening Program(NCSP) and to identify factors affecting the satisfaction. The telephone survey was conducted in July 2007 for the participants who were screened by the NCSP from January through May 2007. Student's t-tests and analysis of variance were performed first to determine if the mean satisfaction score differed by the characteristics of study objects, followed by multiple linear regression analyses to examine the factors affecting satisfaction. Dependent variable was general satisfaction for the screening service, and three dimensions of independent variables - 'sociodemographic characteristics', 'screening characteristics', and 'perceived service quality' - were used for the empirical analyses. Female, old-aged, less educated, Medicaid recipients, rural residents and the participants with normal results were more likely to be satisfied with the NCSP. The results of multiple regression analyses show that gender, age, location of residence, type of screening units, and perceived quality of screening services were significantly related to satisfaction. This study is meaningful as the first attempt to measure participant satisfaction with the NCSP, and to identify factors affecting the satisfaction. Among the identified factors, the NCSP needs to pay attention to perceived quality of service, in particular, to improve the satisfaction. This study is expected to contribute to raising the compliance rate and to improve the quality of the NCSP.

Keywords

References

  1. 보건복지가족부. 2008년도 국가 암조기검진 사업 안내. 서울;보건복지가족부:2008.
  2. 박재산. 환자만족도 평가에 대한 방법론적 접근 : IPA기법을 중심으로. 보건행정학회지 2008;18(3):1-17. https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2008.18.3.001
  3. 정인숙, 김윤진, 이상엽, 전진호. 암 조기검진 수검에 대한 자가보고의 타당도와 신뢰도 평가. 가정의학회지 2006;27:302-312.
  4. Baines CJ, To T, Wall C. Women's attitudes to screening after participation in the national breast screening study: A questionnaire survey. Cancer 1990;65(7):1663-1669 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19900401)65:7<1663::AID-CNCR2820650735>3.0.CO;2-A
  5. Bakker DA, Lightfoot NE, Steggles S, Jackson C. The experience and satisfaction of women attending breast cancer screening. Oncol Nurs Forum 1998;25:115-121.
  6. Bosworth HB, Rockey DC, Paulson EK, Niedzwiecki D, Davis W, Sanders LL, et al. Prospective comparison of patient experience with colon imaging tests. Am J Med. 2006;119(9):791-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.02.013
  7. Cockburn J, Hill D, Irwig L et al. Development and validation of an instrument to measure satisfaction of participants at breast screening programmes. Eur J Cancer 1991;27(7):827-831 https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5379(91)90126-X
  8. Cockburn J, De Luise T, Hurley S et al. Development and validation of the PCQ: a questionnaire to measure the psychological consequences of screening mammography. Soc Sci Med 1992;34(10):1129-1134 https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90286-Y
  9. Cockburn J, Hill D, De Luise T, Flint-Richter D. Satisfaction of attenders during the establishment of an Australian mammography screening program [abstract]. Aust J Public Health 1993;17(2):103-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.1993.tb00116.x
  10. Decker KM, Harrison M, Tate RB. Satisfaction of women attending the Manitoba breast screening program. Prev Med 1999;29(1):22-27. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0497
  11. Dolan NC, Feinglass J, Priyanath A, Haviley C, Sorensen AV, Venta LA. Measuring satisfaction with mammography results reporting. J Gen Intern Med 2004;16:157-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00509.x
  12. Drossaert CH, Boer H, Seydel ER. Monitoring women's experiences during three rounds of breast cancer screening: results from a longitudinal study. J Med Screen 2002;9:168-175. https://doi.org/10.1136/jms.9.4.168
  13. Engelman KK, Cizik AM, Ellerbeck EF. Women's satisfaction with their mammography experience: Results of a qualitative study. Women Health 2005;42(4):17-35. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v42n04_02
  14. Foxall MJ, Barron CR, Houfek J. Women's satisfaction with breast and gynecological cancer screening. Women Health 2003;38(1):21-36. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v38n01_02
  15. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Offord KP, Harris AM, Wilson LA, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 2003;227(2):378-384. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2272020293
  16. Health Services Research Group. A guide to direct measures of patient satisfaction in clinical practice. CMAJ 1992;146(10):1727-1731.
  17. Loeken K, Steine S, Sandvik L, Laerum E, Finset A. A new measure of patient satisfaction with mammography. Validation by factor analytic technique. Fam Pract 1996;13(1):67-74. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.1.67
  18. Loeken K, Steine S, Sandvik L, Laerum E. A new instrument to measure patient satisfaction with mammography. Validity, reliability, and discriminatory power. Med Care 1997;35(7):731-741. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199707000-00006
  19. Loken K, Steine S, Laerum E. Mammography: influence of departmental practice and women's characteristics on patient satisfaction: comparison of six departments in Norway. Qual Health Care 1998;7(3):136-141. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.7.3.136
  20. Loken K, Steine S, Laerum E. Patient satisfaction and quality of care at four diagnostic imaging procedures: mammography, double-contrast barium enema, abdominal ultrasonography and vaginal ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1459-1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050871
  21. Marshall G. A comparative study of re-attenders and non-re-attenders for second triennial National Breast Screening Programme appointments. J Public Health Med 1994;16:79-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-007-0139-8
  22. Orton M, Fitzpatrick R, Fuller A, Mant D, Mlynek C, Thorogood M. Factors affecting women's response to an invitation to attend for a second breast cancer screening examination. Br J Gen Pract 1991;41:320-322.
  23. Peipins LA, Shapiro JA, Bobo JK, Berkowitz Z. Impact of women's experiences during mammography on adherence to rescreening (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2006;17:439-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-005-0447-7
  24. Rehnberg G, Absetz P, Aro AR. Women's satsfaction with information at breast biopsy in breast cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns 2001;42(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00118-4
  25. Roworth MA, Mcllwaine GM, Wallce AM. Women's views of the Scottish Breast Screening Pragramme: a national consumer opinion survey. Public Health 1993;107(3):185-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3506(05)80440-8
  26. Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Bowen NJ, Switzer G, Baum A. Patient satisfaction with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Arch Intern Med 2000;160(12):1790-1796. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.12.1790
  27. Somkin CP, McPhee SJ, Nguyen T, Stewart S, Shema SJ, Nguyen B, et al. The effect of access and satisfaction on regular mammogram and Papanicolaou test screening in a multiethnic population. Med Care 2004;42(9):914-926. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000135832.28672.61
  28. Yacavone RF, Locke GR 3rd, Gostout CJ, Rockwood TH, Thieling S, Zinsmeister AR. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53(7):703-710. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2001.115337

Cited by

  1. Factors Influencing Cancer Rescreening Intention of Korean Elderly vol.18, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7587/kjrehn.2015.118