References
-
김희백, 이선경 (1996). 과학
${\cdot}$ 기술과 관련하여 사회적으로 쟁점화 된 주제에 대한 중${\cdot}$ 고등학생들의 태도. 한국과학교육학회지, 16(4), 461-469 - 박윤복, 김영신, 정완호 (2002). 생물윤리 의사결정 활동이 고등학생들의 합리적인 의사결정능력에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(1), 55-63
- 윤미향 (2006). 과학의 본성에 따른 의사결정 분석. 부산대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문
- Andrew, J., & Robottom, I. (2001). Science and ethics: Some issues for education. Science Education, 85, 769-780 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1038
- Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understanding of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352-377 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10063
- Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2002). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norm of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Evans, J. H. (2002). Playing God? Human genetic engineering and the rationalization of public bioethical debate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Fleming, R. (1986a). Adolescent reasoning in socio-scientific issues. Part Ⅰ: Social cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 677-687 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230803
- Fleming, R. (1986b). Adolescent reasoning in socio-scientific issues. Part Ⅱ: Nonsocial cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 689-698 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230804
- Hogan, K. (2002). Small group's ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 341-368 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10025
- Kolsto, S. D. (2001a). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
- Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319-337 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770306
- Lewis, J., & Leach, J. (2006). Discussion of socio-scientific issues: The role of science knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1267-1287 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500439348
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Natualistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
- Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 139-178 https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1
- Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: teacher perspecctives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 353-376 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20142
- Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387-409 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119456
- Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463-1488 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717
- Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. R. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science Education, 90(6), 986-1004 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20165
- Sadler, T. D. & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1), 4-27 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005a). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005b). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71-93 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023
- Siebert, E. D., & McIntosh, W. J. (Eds.) (2001). College pathway to the science education standards. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press
- Zeidler, D. L., (1984). Moral issues and social policy in science education: Closing the literacy gap. Science Education, 68, 411-419 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730680406
- Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of sociosceintific issues in science education: Philosophy, psychological and pedagogical considerations. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning and discourse on socioscientific issues in science education (pp.7-38). Dordrecht: Kluwer
- Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Forstering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35-62 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008