Journal of Animal Science and Technology

  • 제51권1호
  • /
  • Pages.69-74
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 2672-0191(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2055-0391(eISSN)
한국축산학회 (Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

돼지의 교배조합·도체등급 및 출하일령이 도체특성에 미치는 영향

Effect of Mating System, Carcass Grade and Age at Marketing on Carcass Characteristics of Pigs

  • 김계웅 (공주대학교 동물자원학과) ;
  • 김석은 (공주대학교 동물자원학과)
  • Kim, Gye-Woong (Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University) ;
  • Kim, Seok-Eun (Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University)
  • 투고 : 2009.01.13
  • 심사 : 2009.02.18
  • 발행 : 2009.02.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 도체 등급판정을 받은 비육돈 LY 및 LYD 교잡종 중 암퇘지 128두와 거세돈 528두, 총 656 두를 공시돈으로 교배조합, 도체등급 및 출하일령별 도체 및 육질특성을 조사하여 고급돈육생산에 필요한 기초적 자료를 얻고자 실시하였다. 교배조합별 도체특성의 변화에서 근내 지방도와 보수력은 두 교배조합 간에 각각 통계적으로 유의한 차이(p<0.05)를 보였으나, 도체중, 등지방 두께, 육색, 도체등급 및 출하일령은 두 교배조합 간에 유의차가 나타나지 않았다. 도체등급별 도체특성 분석에서 도체중은 도체등급이 떨어질수록 유의하게(p<0.05) 무거웠다. 등지방 두께는 도체등급이 높을수록 유의하게(p<0.05) 얇은 성적을 나타났으나, 육색도에서는 도체등급간에 통계적 유의차는 없었다. 보수력은 도체등급 간에 유의한 차이(p<0.05)를 보인 반면에, 출하일령은 유의성 있는 차이는 나타나지 않았다. 출하일령별 도체특성에서 도체중과 등지방 두께는 출하일령 간에 통계적으로 유의하게(p<0.05) 일령이 많을수록 무겁게 나타났으나, 육색은 일령간에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 근내 지방도는 출하일령이 많을수록 유의하게(p<0.05) 높았으나, 도체등급과 보수력에서는 출하일령이 적을수록 유의하게(p<0.05) 높게 나타났다. 그리고 A 등급 출현율은 출하일령이 높은 돈군보다 166~170 일령 돈군에서 53.5%로 가장 높게 나타났다. 도체형질 간의 상관계수 추정에서 도체중은 등지방 두께와 정(+)의 중등 상관이었으나, 도체등급과는 부(-)의 상관이 존재하였으며, 등지방 두께와 도체등급 간에는 부(-) 상관, 육색과 보수력 간에는 고도의 부(-)의 상관, 그리고 근내 지방도와 보수력은 정(+)의 중등 상관이 각각 존재하였다.

This study was carried out to investigate the carcass characteristics of crossbred pigs according to mating system, carcass grade and age at marketing. A total of 656 pigs of 128 gilts and 528 barrows were collected and analyzed at public slaughter house. Differences between LY and LYD crossbred on marbling score and water holding capacity were significantly (p<0.05) found. The influences of LY and LYD crossbred on carcass weight, backfat thickness, meat colour, carcass grade and age at marketing were not significantly showed. The carcass weight of D carcass grade was significantly (p<0.05) heavier than that of the other grade. The backfat thickness was significantly (p<0.05) appeared gradually in accordance with the increase of carcass grade. There was significantly difference among the carcass grades on water holding capacity (p<0.05). The differences among the carcass grades on the meat colour, marbling score and age at marketing were not found significantly. The carcass weight of high age group at marketing was significantly heavier than that of the low age group (p<0.05). The backfat thickness of the group of high age at marketing was significantly thicker than that of the group of low age (p<0.05). There were significant differences among age group at marketing in marbling score, carcass grade, and water holding capacity, respectively (p<0.05). The carcass weight was positively correlated with the backfat thickness but negatively correlated with the carcass grade. The correlation between the backfat and carcass grade was significantly negative. The meat colour was negatively correlated with water holding capacity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Boggs, D. L. and Merkel, R. A. 1984. Live Animal Carcass Evaluation and Selection Manual, Kendall/hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa.
  2. Carmeron, N. D. 1990. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for fatty acid composition of subcutaneous fat, meat quality, carcass composition and eating quality traits in pigs. Proc. 4th WCGALP 15:549.
  3. Cho, S. H., Park, B. Y., Kim, J. H., Kim, M. J., Seong, P. N., Kim, Y. J., Kim, D. H. and Ahn, C. N. 2007. Carcass Yields and Meat Quality by Live Weight of Korean Native Black Pigs. J. Anim. Sci. & Technol. 49: 523-530. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2007.49.4.523
  4. Choi, Y. I., Kim, Y. T., Lee, C. L. and Han, I. K. 2000. Carcass and Pork Quality Characteristics by Sex and Marketing Day. J. Anim. Sci. & Technol. 42(6):933-940.
  5. Choi, Y. S. 2004. Studies on the pork quality of Korean native black pigs and its improvement through dietary manipulation. Ph. D. thesis, Kangwon National Univ., Chuncheon, Korea. pp. 1-169.
  6. Choi, Y. S., Park, B. Y., Lee, J. M. and Lee. S. K. 2005. Comparison of Carcass and Meat Quality Characteristics between Korean Native Black Pigs and Commercial Crossbred Pigs. Korean J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 25:322-327.
  7. Hah, K. H., Jin, S. K., Kim, I. S., Song, Y. M., Lee, J. R. and Chung, K. Y. 2005. Pork Quality Characteristics by Different Backfat Thickness. Korean J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 25:391-396.
  8. Honikel, K. O. 1987. Wasserbindungsvermogen von fleisch. Fleischwirtsch. 67: 418.
  9. Hovenier, R., Kanis, E., Brascamp, E. W. and Knap, P. W. 1994. Including meat quality in pig breeding program, Proc. 5th WCGALP 19:465.
  10. Jin, S. K., Kim, I. S., Hur, S. J., Kim, S. J. and Jeong, K. J. 2004. The Influence of Pig Breeds on Qualities of Loin. J. Anim. Sci. & Technol. 48:747-758.
  11. Jin, S. K., Kim, I. S., Song, Y. M., Hur, S. J., Hah, K. H., Kim, H. Y., Lyou, H. J., Ha, J. H. and Kim, B. W. 2004. Physic-Chemical Characteristics of Crossbred Pigs with Carcass Grade. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 24:246-252.
  12. Joo, S. T., Kauffman, R. G., Kim, B. C. and Park, G. B. 1999. The relationship of sarcoplasmic and myofibrillae protein solubility to colour and water-holding capacity in porcine longissimus muscle. Meat Sci. 52:291-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00005-4
  13. Kim, J. H., Park, B. Y., Yoo, Y. M., Cho, S. H., Hwang, I. H., Seong, P. N., Hah, K. H. and Lee, J. M. 2006. Characteristics of Carcass and Meat Quality for Landrace, Yorkshire, Duroc and their Crossbred. Korean J. Anim. Sci. & Technol. 48(1):101-106. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2006.48.1.101
  14. Larzul, C., Lefaucheur, L., Ecolan, P., Gogue, J., Talmant, A., Sellier, P., Le Roy, P. and Monin, G. 1997. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for longissimus muscle fiber characteristics in relation to growth, carcass, and meat quality traits in Large White pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 75:3126. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.75123126x
  15. Lee, J. G. and Joo, S. T. 1999. Effects of Slaughter Weight on Backfat Thickness, Intramuscular Fat and Physical Properties of Pork Loin from Barrow. Korean J. Anim. Sci. 41(2):207-214.
  16. Lee. M. S., Lee, Y. I., Lee, S., Kim, S. H., Jung, Y. C., Koh, K. C., Hong, K. C. and Kim, B. C. 1996. Carcass Traits and Pork Quality for Purebred and Crossbred Pigs in Korea. Korean J. Anim. Sci. 38(5):527-535.
  17. Park, K. K., Park, H. Y., Jung, Y. C., Lee, E. S., Yang, S. Y., Im, B. S. and Kim, C. J. 2005. Effects of Fermented Food Waste Feeds on Pork Carcass and Meat Quality Properties. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 37(1): 38-43.
  18. Park. M. J., Ha, D. M., Shin, H. W., Lee, S. H., Kim, W. K., Ha, S. H., Yang, H. S., Jeong, J. Y., Joo, S. T. and Lee, C. Y. 2007. Growth Efficiency, Carcass Quality Characteristics and Profitability of 'High'-Market Weight Pigs. Korean J. Anim. Sci. & Technol. 49(4):459-470. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2007.49.4.459
  19. Wood, J, D., Enser, M. and Moncrieff, C. B. 1988. Effects of carcass fatness and sex on the composition and quality of pig meat. proc. 34th Inter. Cong. Meat Sci. Techn., Brisbane, Australia, 562.
  20. Zhu, L. G. and Brewer, M. S. 1998. Discoloration of fresh pork as related to muscle and display conditions. J. Food Sci. 63:763-767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1998.tb17895.x
  21. SAS. 1997. SAS User’s Guide : Statistical Analysis System, Cary. NC.
  22. 농림부. 2007. 축산물등급판정세부기준. 돼지도체규격등급과 육질등급판정기준. pp. 15-16.
  23. 농림수산식품부. 2008. 주요 축산물 소비량. pp. 104-105.
  24. 송영민, 진상근, 이성대, 하경희, 정맹화. 2002. 돈방구조와 발효사료 급여가 비육돈의 육질에 미치는 영향. 한국국제농업개발학회지 14(3):169-175.
  25. 원광식. 1997. 소․돼지 도체수율 및 육질특성. 농촌진흥청 축산기술연구소. pp. 11-25.

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of Protein Fractionation and Buffer Solubility of Forage Sources on In Vitro Fermentation Characteristics, Degradability and Gas Production vol.32, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.1.59
  2. Effects of Carcass Weight and Back-fat Thickness on Carcass Properties of Korean Native Pigs vol.37, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.3.385