DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Surface Roughness Impact on Francis Turbine Performances and Prediction of Efficiency Step Up

  • Maruzewski, Pierre (Ecole polytechnique federale de Lausanne, Laboratory of Hydraulic Machines) ;
  • Hasmatuchi, Vlad (Ecole polytechnique federale de Lausanne, Laboratory of Hydraulic Machines) ;
  • Mombelli, Henri-Pascal (Ecole polytechnique federale de Lausanne, Laboratory of Hydraulic Machines) ;
  • Burggraeve, Danny (British Columbia Hydro Generating Engineering Country) ;
  • Iosfin, Jacob (British Columbia Hydro Generating Engineering Country) ;
  • Finnegan, Peter (British Columbia Hydro Generating Engineering Country) ;
  • Avellan, Francois (Ecole polytechnique federale de Lausanne, Laboratory of Hydraulic Machines)
  • Accepted : 2009.05.27
  • Published : 2009.12.01

Abstract

In the process of turbine modernizations, the investigation of the influences of water passage roughness on radial flow machine performance is crucial and validates the efficiency step up between reduced scale model and prototype. This study presents the specific losses per component of a Francis turbine, which are estimated by CFD simulation. Simulations are performed for different water passage surface roughness heights, which represents the equivalent sand grain roughness height. As a result, the boundary layer logarithmic velocity profile still exists for rough walls, but moves closer to the wall. Consequently, the wall friction depends not only on roughness height but also on its shape and distribution. The specific losses are determined by CFD numerical simulations for each component of the prototype, taking into account its own specific sand grain roughness height. The model efficiency step up between reduced scale model and prototype value is finally computed by the assessment of specific losses on prototype and by evaluating specific losses for a reduced scale model with smooth walls. Furthermore, surveys of rough walls of each component were performed during the geometry recovery on the prototype and comparisons are made with experimental data from the EPFL Laboratory for Hydraulic Machines reduced scale model measurements. This study underlines that if rough walls are considered, the CFD approach estimates well the local friction loss coefficient. It is clear that by considering sand grain roughness heights in CFD simulations, its forms a significant part of the global performance estimation. The availability of the efficiency field measurements provides an unique opportunity to assess the CFD method in view of a systematic approach for turbine modernization step up evaluation. Moreover, this paper states that CFD is a very promising tool for future evaluation of turbine performance transposition from the scale model to the prototype.

Keywords

References

  1. Kurokawa J., Toyokura T., Shinjo M., Matsuo K., 1978, “Roughness effects on the flow along an enclosed rotating disk,” bulletin of JSME, Vol. 21, No. 162, pp. 1725-1732. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.21.1725
  2. Tanaka H., Nichtawitz A., 2000. “New scale effect formula being studied for future IEC code,” IAHR Symposium, Charlotte.
  3. Tanaka H., Nichtawitz A., June 29-July 2, 2004, “Scale effect formula for future IEC code its theoretical background and features,” IAHR Symposium, Stockholm.
  4. Nichtawitz A., Tanaka H., June 29-July 2, 2004, “Derivation of formulae for future IEC code on scale effects,” IAHR Symposium, Stockholm.
  5. Krishnamachar P., Fay A., 2007, “The effect of surface roughness, International Water Power and Dam Construction, www.waterpowermagazine.com.
  6. Maruzewski P., Hasmatuchi V., Mombelli H.-P., Burggraeve D., Iosfin J., Finnegan P. and Avellan F., 2008, “Surface roughness impact on Francis turbine performances and prediction of efficiency step up,” 24th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Foz do Iguassu, Brasil.
  7. Churchill S.W., 1988, Viscous Flows, “The practical use of theory,” Butterworth Ser Chem Engng, ISBN 0-409-95185-4.
  8. EPFL, 2006, British Columbia Hydro, “Geometry recover of Francis turbine,” technical report, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  9. Lechner R., Menter F. R., 2008, “Treatment of rough wall on CFX-11, ANSYS technical report,” Germany.
  10. White M., 1979, “Viscous Fluid flow,” Mac Graw-Hill.
  11. Schlichting H., 1979, “Boundary layer,” Mac Graw Hill.
  12. Avellan F., 2005, Cours de turbomachines hydrauliques, equations des turbomachines. Cours, EPFL.
  13. Maruzewski P., Avellan F., 2008, “Roughness analysis,” EPFL technical report, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  14. Osterwalder J., Hippe L., 1984, “Guidelines for efficiency scaling process of hydraulic turbomachines with different technical roughnesses of low passages,” Journal Hydraulic Research, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 77-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688409499386

Cited by

  1. Selection of Optimal Number of Francis Runner Blades for a Sediment Laden Micro Hydropower Plant in Nepal vol.8, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5293/IJFMS.2015.8.4.294
  2. Numerical Techniques Applied to Hydraulic Turbines: A Perspective Review vol.68, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032681
  3. Influence of wall roughness on the static performance and pressure fluctuation characteristics of a double-suction centrifugal pump vol.232, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0957650918757246