Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

TREATMENT OF MIDFACE DEFICIENCY ON ADULT CLEFT LIP AND PALATE INDIVIDUALS BY DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS : CASE REPORT

골신연술에 의한 성인 구순구개열자의 중안면함몰의 개선: 증례보고

  • Son, Woo-Sung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kang, Sang-Wook (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kang, Dae-Geun (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Ryoul (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 손우성 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 교정학교실) ;
  • 강상욱 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 교정학교실) ;
  • 강대근 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 교정학교실) ;
  • 김종렬 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Published : 2009.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Maxillary deficiency, anterior cross bite, constriction of maxillary arch, malaligned teeth are frequently observed in patients with cleft lip and palate. Surgery and orthodontics, combined intervention are needed to correct maxillary deficiency. Distraction osteogenesis that currently used has many advantages like less relapse tendency, more advancement of maxilla, capable in growing patients. In case 1, 18 years old girl with BCLP had severe midfacial deficiency and multiple missing of teeth. LeFort I osteotomy, followed by maxillary distraction osteogenesis utilizing rigid external distraction device(RED) system, was performed. After a 6-day latency period, distraction proceeded at a rate of 1mm per day (at 1st week, 1.5mm/day). Total advancement was 19mm. The RED device left in place for the additional 4 weeks for consolidation. After the RED device was removed, face mask was applied with elastic traction for 5 weeks. After achieving acceptable facial appearance and occlusion, orthodontic appliance was removed. The results after 4 years follow-up was sustained pretty well without aggravation of velopharyngeal function. In case 2, 22 years old man with UCLP had severe midfacial deficiency and palatally erupted upper 2nd premolars due to arch length discrepancy, but the anterior segment of maxillary did not show constriction and crowding. patient had no arch width discrepancy, crowding was concentrated on premolar region. Segmental LeFort I osteotomy was performed. After a 6 - day latency period, using internal distraction device, distraction proceeded at a 0.5mm per day(at 1st week, 0.75 - 1 mm/day). Total advancement was 15mm. After internal distraction device was removed, face mask was applied with elastic traction for 4 weeks. After surgical-orthodontic treatment, facial appearance and occlusion was improved pretty good, and after 46 months follow-up the result was retained well.

Keywords

References

  1. Aduss H : Craniofacial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Angle Orthod 41: 202, 1971
  2. Semb G : A study of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the OSLO CLP team. Cleft palate Craniofac J 28: 1, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1991)028<0001:ASOFGI>2.3.CO;2
  3. Song IW, Kim JR: Stability and soft tissue changes following advancement Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft lip and palate patients. The Journal Of Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 24: 237, 2002
  4. Figueroa AA, Polley JW: Management of severe cleft maxillary deficiency with distraction osteogenesis: Procedure and results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115: 1, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70310-0
  5. Kim J, Yoon HJ: Management of dentofacial deformities patients through distraction osteogensis. The Journal Of Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 22: 657, 2000
  6. Park YW, Kim JH, Cha BK: Gradual distraction technique for maxillary protraction - Report of 2 cases. The Journal Of Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 22: 687, 2000
  7. Ryu SY, Hwang U, Park HJ et al: Maxillary advancement using a rigid external distractor in patients with cleft maxillary deficiency: Report of two cases. Journal of The Korean Cleft Lip And Palate Association 9: 1, 2006
  8. Yu NY, Park HW, Kim SM et al: Maxillary advancement using rigid external distraction(RED) in cleft lip and palate patient: case report. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 32: 209, 2005
  9. Xiao-Xia Wang, Xing Wang, Biao Yi et al: Internal midface distraction in correction of severe maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 116: 51, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000169691.22783.29
  10. Kuroda S, Araki Y, Oya S et al: Maxillary distraction osteogenesis to treat maxillary hypoplasia: Comparison of an internal and an external system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127: 493, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.014
  11. Graber TM: A cephaolmetric analysis of the developmental pattern and facial morphology in cleft palate. Angle Orthod 19: 91, 1949
  12. Ross RB: The clinical implication of facial growth in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 7: 37, 1970
  13. Ross RB: Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 24:71, 1987
  14. Tateishi C, Moriyama K, Takano-Yamamoto T: Dentocraniofacial morphology of 12 Japanese subjects with unilateral cleft lip and palate with a severe Class Ⅲ malocclusion: A cephalometric study at the pretreatment stage of surgical orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 386: 597, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(2001)038<0597:DMOJSW>2.0.CO;2
  15. Alam MK, Kajii TS, Koshikawa-Matsuno et al: Multivariate analysis of factors affecting dental arch relationships in Japanese unilateral cleft lip and palate patients at Hokkaido University Hospital. Orthodontic Waves 67: 45, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.odw.2007.12.001
  16. Posnick JC: Orthognathic surgery for the cleft lip and palate patient. Semin Orthod 2: 205, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(96)80016-8
  17. Proffit WR, Turvey TA: Special problems in cleft-palate patients. In: Proffit WR, White RP, editors. Surgical-Orthodontic treatment. St. Louis, Mosby, 625, 1997
  18. Figueroa AA. Polley JW, Friede H et al: Long term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 114: 1382, 2004.; discussion 1393
  19. Erbe M, Stoelinga PJ, Leenen RJ: Long-term results of segmental repositioning of the maxilla in cleft palate patients without previously grafted alveolo-palatal clefts. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 24: 109, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(96)80022-9
  20. Codivilla A: On the means of lengthening in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. Am J Orthop Surg 2: 353, 1905
  21. Ilizarov GV: The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part 1. The influence of stability of fixation and soft tissue preservation. Clin Orthop 238: 249, 1989
  22. Synder CC, Levine GA, Swanson HM et al: Mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction : Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 51: 506, 1973 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197305000-00003
  23. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N: Lengthening the Mandibular body by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89: 1992
  24. Polley JW, Figueroa AA: Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device. J Craniofac Surg May 8(3): 181; discussion 186, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199705000-00008
  25. Polley JW, Figueroa AA: Rigid external distraction: Its application in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg Oct 102(5): 1360; discussion 1373, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199810000-00007
  26. Rachmiel A, Aizenbud D, Eleftheriou S: External vs. intraoral distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Ann Plast Surg Oct 45(4): 386, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200045040-00006
  27. Cheung LK, Zhang Q, Wong MC et al: Stability consideration for internal maxillary distractor. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 31(3): 142, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(03)00005-2
  28. Wang XX, Wang X, Yi B et al: Internal midface distraction in correction of severe maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(1): 51, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000169691.22783.29
  29. Kuroda S, Araki Y, Oya S et al: Maxillary distraction osteogenesis to treat maxillary hypoplasia: comparison of an internal and an external system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127(4): 493, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.014
  30. Kumar A, Gabbay JS, Nikjoo R et al: Improved outcomes in cleft patients with severe maxillary deficiency after Le Fort I internal distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(5): 1499, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000206308.86089.86
  31. Gateno J, Engel ER, Teichgraeber JF et al: A new Le Fort I internal distraction device in the treatment of severe maxillary hypoplasia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63(1): 148, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.09.010
  32. Liou EJ, Chen PK, Huang CS et al: Interdental distraction osteogenesis and rapid orthodontic tooth movement: a novel approach to approximate a wide alveolar cleft or bony defect. Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 1262, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200004040-00002
  33. Tae KC, Gong, SG, Min SK et al Use of distraction osteogenesis in cleft palate patients. Angle Orthod 73: 602, 2003
  34. Kuroe K, Iino S, Shomura K et al: Unilateral advancement of the maxillary minor segment by distraction osteogenesis in patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: report of two cases. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J 40: 317, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(2003)040<0317:UAOTMM>2.0.CO;2
  35. Bengi AO, Gurton AO, Okcu KM et al: Premaxillary distraction osteogenesis with an individual tooth-borne appliance. Angle Orthod 74 : 420, 2004
  36. Sassano P, Agrillo A, Mustazza MC et al: Intraoral distraction of a patient with premaxilla agenesis. J Craniofac Surg 16: 500, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JPS.0000157813.91673.B9
  37. Mitsugi M, Ito O, Alcalde RE: Maxillary bone transportation in alveolar cleft-transport distraction osteogenesis for treatment of alveolar cleft repair. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 58: 619, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.02.020
  38. Bevilacqua RG, Ritoli EL, Kang C et al: Midmaxillary internal distraction osteogenesis: Ideal surgery for the mature cleft patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 121: 1768, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816a9f2d
  39. Guyette TW, Polley JW, Figueroa A et al: Changes in speech following maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38: 199, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(2001)038<0199:CISFMD>2.0.CO;2
  40. Harada K, Ishii Y, Ishii M et al: Effect of maxillary distraction osteogenensis on velopharyngeal function: A pilot study. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Radiol Endod 93 : 538, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.123827
  41. Ha DH, Jung SH, Yun SH et al: The effect of canine mandible distraction osteogenesis relating to distraction rate. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 104: 133, 1999
  42. Ahn JH, Choi IH, Hwang DH et al: Angiogenesis in Distraction Osteogenesis. J Korean Orthop Assoc 34: 631, 1999
  43. Shin SH, Kim JR, Song JH: A comparison study on distraction osteogenesis in the rat's mandible according to distraction rhythm. The Journal Of Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 24 : 115, 2002
  44. Kim HS, Kim ML, Lee SG et al: Implant-supported prosthesis placed in the distraction-augmented alveolar bones: Review Of 2 cases. The Journal Of Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 25: 88, 2003