Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia

World Association for Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies (세계트리플헬릭스미래전략학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Can Democratic Consolidation Make a Country Less Secure? The Case of Taiwan

  • Rich, Timothy S. (Department of Political Science, Indiana University)
  • Published : 2009.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  2. Anderson, Christopher J. 1998. Party Systems, and Satisfaction with Democratic Performance in the New Europe. Political Studies, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 572-588 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00155
  3. Bartolini, Stefano and Peter Mair, 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilization of European Electorates 1885-1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Bielasiak, Jack. 2002. The Institutionalization of Electoral and Party Systems in Postcommunist States. Comparative Politics,Vol.34, No. 2, pp.89-210.
  5. Birch, Sarah. 2001. Electoral Systems and Party Systems in Europe East and West. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, Vol.2, No.3, pp.35-77.
  6. Cabestan, Jean-Pierre. 1998. Taiwan's Mainland Policy: Normalization, Yes; Reunification, Later. In Contemporary Taiwan. Edited by David Shambaugh. New York: Oxford University Press.
  7. Carkoglu, Ali. 1998. The Turkish Party System in Transition: Party Performance and Agenda Change. Political Studies. Vol 46, No. 3, pp. 544-571. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00154
  8. Carpenter, Ted Galen 2006. America's Coming War with China; A Collision Course Over Taiwan. Palgrave Macmillan: New York.
  9. Central News Agency. 1997. ROC's UN Bid is Long-Term Goal: Acting Foreign Minister. September 18.
  10. China Post. 2006. More PFP Lawmakers Defect to KMT. January 28.
  11. Christensen, Thomas J. 2001. Posing Problems Without Catching Up: Chinese Rise and Challenges for U.S. Security Policy. International Security, Vol. 25, No.4, pp.5-40.
  12. Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. 2007. [dataset]. (www.cses.org).
  13. Copper, John F. 2003. Taiwan: Nation-State or Province? Boulder: Westview Press.
  14. Copper, John F. 2005. Consolidating Taiwan's Democracy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
  15. Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  16. Cox, Gary W. and Octavio Amorim Neto. 1997. Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 41, pp. 149-174 https://doi.org/10.2307/2111712
  17. Dahl, Robert A.1982. Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy; Autonomy vs. Control. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  18. Downs, Anthony. 1957. Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper and Row.
  19. Duverger, Maurice. 1963. Political Parties. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  20. Economist. 1999. A Cargo from Taiwan. July 10.
  21. Evans, Geoffrey and Stephen Whitefield. 1998. The Structuring of Political Cleavages in Post-Communist Societies: the Case of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Political Studies, Vol. 46, pp. 115-139 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00133
  22. Garver, John W. 1997. Face Off: China, the United States, and Taiwan's Democratization. University of Washington Press: Seattle.
  23. Geddes, Barbara. 2004. The Development of Party Systems in Latin America. Presented at the Western Political Science Association Meeting.
  24. Hood, Steven J. 1997. The Kuomintang and the Democratization of Taiwan. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  25. Hsieh, John Fuh-Sheng. 2000. East Asian Culture and Democratic Transition, With Special Reference to the Case of Taiwan. Journal of Asian & African Studies, Vol. 34, No.1, pp. 29-42
  26. Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng. 2005. Ethnicity, National Identity, and Domestic Politics in Taiwan. Journal of Asian and African Studies, Vol. 40, No. 1-2, pp.13-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909605052936
  27. Huang, Teh-fu. Election and Evolution of Kuomintang. In Taiwan's Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition Edited by Hung-mao Tien. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
  28. Huntington, Samuel. 1965. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale.
  29. Kitschelt, Herbert. 1995. The Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies. Party Politics, Vol 1: pp. 447-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001004002
  30. Kostelecky, Tomas. 2002. Political Parties After Communism: Developments in East-Central Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  31. Lasater, Martin L. 2000. The Taiwan Conundrum in U.S. China Policy. Westview: Boulder, CO.
  32. Lin, Jih-wen. 2004. Taiwan's Referendum Act and the Stability of the Status Quo. Issues and Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 119-153.
  33. Lipset, Seymour M. and Stein Rokkan. 1967. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. Edited by Seymour M. Lipset and Stein Rokkan. New York: Free Press.
  34. Lijphart, Arend, Ronald Rogowski, and Kenneth R. Weaver. 1993. Separation of Powers and Cleavage Management. In Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. Edited by Bert A. Rockman and Kenneth R. Weaver. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  35. MacDonald, Stuart Elaine, Olsa Listhaug, and George Rabinowitz. 1991. Issues and Party Support in Multi-Party Democracies. American Political Science Review, Vol. 85, No.4, pp. 1107-1131. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963938
  36. Mengin, Francoise. 1998. The Foreign Policy of the ROC on Taiwan since 1971: An Overview. In The Republic of China on Taiwan in International Politics. Edited by Marie-Luise Nath. Peter Lang Publishing: Berlin.
  37. Miller, Arthur H., Gwyn Erb, William M. Reisinger, and Vicki L. Hesli. 2000. Emerging Party Systems in Post-Soviet Societies: Fact or Fiction? Journal of Politics, Vol. 62, No.2, pp. 455-490. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00021
  38. Mainwaring, Scott. 1993.Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination. Comparative Political Studies, Vol.26, No. 2, pp. 198-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414093026002003
  39. Mainwaring, Scott. 1998. Party Systems in the Third Wave. Journal of Democracy, Vol. 9, No.2, pp. 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1998.0049
  40. Mainwaring, Scott and Timothy Scully (eds.), Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America (Stanford, CA: Stanford Press, 1995).
  41. Nathan, Andrew. 2000. What's Wrong with American Taiwan Policy. The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 93-106
  42. Nye, Joseph S. 1998. A Taiwan Deal. Washington Post. March 8.
  43. O'Hanlon, Michael. 2000. Why China Cannot Conquer Taiwan. International Security, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 51-86. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228800560453
  44. Payne, Richard J.and Cassandra R. Veney. 2002. Taiwan and Africa: Taipei's Continuing Search for International Recognition. In Conceptualizing/Reconceptualizing Africa: The Construction of African Historical Identity. Edited by Maghan Keita. Koninklijke Brill Publishers Leiden: Netherlands.
  45. Peterson. M.J. 1997. Recognition of Governments: Legal Doctrine and State Practice, 1815-1995. St. Martin's Press: New York.
  46. Pollack, Jonathan D. 1996. China's Taiwan Strategy: A Point of No Return? The China Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 111-16 https://doi.org/10.2307/2950379
  47. Powell, G. Bingham. 1982. Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability and Violence. Cambridge: Harvard University.
  48. Rae, Douglas W. and Michael Taylor. 1970. The Analysis of Political Cleavages. New Haven, CT. Yale University Press.
  49. Rawnsley, Gary D. 2000. Taiwan's Informal Diplomacy and Propaganda. St. Martin's Press. New York. 2000.
  50. Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  51. Shih, Chih-yu. 2003. Navigating Sovereignty: World Politics Lost in China. Palgrave Mac-Millan: New York.
  52. Shvetsova, Olga. 1999. A Survey of Post-Communist Electoral Institutions: 1990-1998. Electoral Studies, Vol. 18, No.3, pp.397-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00013-X
  53. Swaine, Michael D. 2004. Trouble in Taiwan. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 39-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/20033901
  54. Swaine, Michael and James Mulvenon. 2001. Taiwan's Foreign and Defense Policies: Features and Determinants. Rand Corporation: Santa Monica, CA.
  55. Taipei Times. 2000. Chen Likely to Reject NUC Chair. August 18.
  56. Taiwan Yearbook. Electoral Systems. http://english.www.gov.tw/Yearbook/index.jsp?categid=154&recordid=83244.
  57. Van Kemenade, Willem. 2000. Taiwan, Voting for Trouble? Washington Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 135-151.
  58. Wachman, Alan M. 1994. Taiwan: National Identity and Democratization. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1994.
  59. Wang, T.Y. 2001. Cross-Strait Relations After the 2000 Election in Taiwan: Changing Tactics in a New Reality. Asian Survey, Vol. 41, No.5, pp. 716-736. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2001.41.5.716
  60. Ware, Alan. 1996. Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  61. Wu, Xinbo.2001. To be an Enlightened Superpower. Washington Quarterly, Vol. 24, No.3, pp. 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1162/01636600152102214
  62. Zielinski, Jakub. 2002. Translating Social Cleavages into Party Systems: The Significance of New Democracies. World Politics, Vol. 54, No. 2: pp. 184-211. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2002.0005

Cited by

  1. Ma Ying-jeou's Presidential Discourse vol.41, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261204100303