Assessment of Individual, Organizational, Environmental Capacity for Healthy Cities

건강도시사업추진을 위한 개인, 조직, 환경 역량의 평가

  • Kim, Jung-Min (Department of Preventive Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine) ;
  • Koh, Kwang-Wook (Department of Preventive Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine)
  • 김정민 (고신대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 고광욱 (고신대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Received : 2009.05.15
  • Accepted : 2009.06.13
  • Published : 2009.06.30

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to asses individual, organizational and environmental capacity for members of Healthy Cities Partnership (KHCP) and exploring advanced suggestions for further developing. Methods: Participants were 27. The questionnaire was developed based on Health Promotion Capacity Checklist and it analyze capacity in 3 lelvels including individual, organizational and environmental. Each level is consist of 4 sections, individual: 'Knowledge', 'Skills', 'Commitment' and 'Resources', organizational; 'Commitment', 'Culture', 'Structure' and 'Resources', environment:'Public opinion', 'Political will', 'Supportive organizations' and 'Ideas and other resources'. Each section was assessed in 4 point rating scale and cross analyzed with basic information. Results: The mean score of 3 levels were 2.57. Among the 3 levels, 'Individual' marks 2.78 point which were top and 'Organizational' marks 2.59 and 'Environmental' marks 2.33. There were no significant factors affecting Healthy cities capacity of 'Individual' and 'Organizational' level, but just 'specialization' of 'Environmental' had significance. Conclusion: Above the results, this study suggested that just 'Individual' capacity is above median point and other levels were lower. Further efforts for developing Healthy cities capacity, especially focused on 'Organizational' and 'Environmental' levels, is strongly required.

Keywords

References

  1. 권순만. 캐나다 보건의료제도와 공공성에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 보건대학원, 국민건강보험공단. 2006
  2. 남은우. 건강도시사업 추진과 정책 과제, 보건교육.건강증진학회지 2007:24(2):123-134
  3. 문옥륜, 제24회 보건의 날 기념‘건강한 도시 가꾸기’를 위한 토론회 자료집. 대한보건협회.보건복지부, 1996
  4. 윤석준. 지역사회와 시민사회의 건강증진사업 활성화를 위한 주요 논점. 대한보건연구 2007;33(1):22-24
  5. 이명순. 건강증진사업을 위한 지역사회 참여와 연대 구축. 한국보건교육.건강증진학회 국제 심포지엄 자료집. 2005년 9월
  6. 이부옥, 대한민국 건강도시 네트워크. 한국보건교육.건강증진학회 2007년도 춘계학술대회 자료집. 계명대학교, 2007년 4월
  7. 이선희. 민간 부문의 건강증진 서비스 확충과 발전방안 연구. 대한보건연구 2007;33(1):14-21
  8. Aspen institute. Measuring community capacity building: A Work book in progress for rural communities. Version 3-96 http: //staging. aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/community%20strategies%0group/Measuring_Community_Capactiy_Building.pdf 2004
  9. Bauer G, 외 5인. Advancing a theoretical model for public health and health promotion indicator development. European Journal of Public Health 2003;13(3):107-113
  10. Fletcher F, McKennitt D, Baydala L. Community Capacity Building; An Aboriginal Explpratory Case Study. A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health 2008;5(2):9-32
  11. Mc Lean S, Feather J, Butle D. Building Health Promotion Capacity:Action For Learning, Learning From Action. Presses Universitaires Fribourg, 2005
  12. NSW Health department. A Framework for Building Capacity to Improve Health.http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/pubs/2001/pdf/framework_improve.pdf. 2001
  13. Prairie region health promotion research centre. Health promotion capacity checklist: A workbook for individual, organizational, and environmental assessment. http://www.prhprc.usask.ca/publications/finalworkbook.pdf. 2004
  14. Public Health Agency of Canada, Alberta/NWT Region. Community Capacity Building Tool: A tool for planning, building and reflecting on community capacity in community based health projects
  15. Tsouros A. The WHO Healthy Cities Project: state of the art and future plans. Health Promotion International 1995:10(2):133-141 https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/10.2.133
  16. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Healthy cities and urban governance. What is the Healthy cities approach. homepage. http://www.euro.who.int/healthy-cities/introducing/20050202_2