The Effects of Ankle Joint Angle on Knee Extensor Electromyographic Activity

발목관절의 각도가 무릎관절 폄근의 근활성도에 미치는 영향

  • Yeo, Sang-Seok (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University) ;
  • Kwon, Jung-Won (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University) ;
  • Kim, Chung-Sun (Department of Physical Therapy, Collage of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University)
  • 여상석 (대구대학교 대학원 재활과학과 물리치료) ;
  • 권중원 (대구대학교 대학원 재활과학과 물리치료) ;
  • 김중선 (대구대학교 재활과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Published : 2009.02.28

Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to find the effect of ankle joint angle on knee extensor electromyographic activity following knee extension exercise. Methods : Ten male university students participated in the study. The subjects performed isometric maximal voluntary knee extensor contractions (MVC) and knee extensor EMG activity measured in with three different ankle joint angle. The EMG activity of rectus femoris(RF), vastus medialis(VM), vastus lateralis(VL) were measured using surface electromyography. Results : EMG activity of vastus lateralis following the change of ankle joint angle was shown statistically significant difference. Conclusion : Ankle plantar flexion position increase EMG activity of vastus lateralis during knee extension exercise.

Keywords

References

  1. 강세윤. 20대 건강한 청년의 슬관절 신전근 및 굴곡근에 대한 등속성 운동검사. 대한재활의학회지. 1986;10:116-23.
  2. 김성중. 기립자세에서 발위치가 무릎폄근의 등척성 수측 근전도 활성도에 미치는 영향. 한국전문룰리치료학회지. 2001;8(2):1-16.
  3. 유정석, 김태연. 무릎관절 각도가 발목 근육의 그전도 활성도에 미치는 영향. 한국전문물리치료학회지. 2006;12(1):16-26.
  4. 한상완. 단일관절운동과 복합관절운동시 슬관절 각도에 따른 대퇴사두근의 표면근전도 비교 분석. 대한물리치료학회지. 2004;16(3):401-11.
  5. Arampatzis A, Karamanidis K, Stafilidis S et al. Effect of different ankle- and knee-joint positions on gastrocnemius medialis fascicle length and EMG activity during isometric plantar flexion. J Biomech. 2006;39(10):1891-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.010
  6. Blake RL, Burns DP, Colson JP. Etiology of atraumatic medial knee pain. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1971;71(10):580-3.
  7. David BJ. Hollinshead's functional anatomy of the limbs and back. 8th ed. Seoul. Hyun moon all rights reserved. 2003:441-2.
  8. Eng JJ, Pierrynowski MR. Evaluation of soft foot orthotics in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Phys Ther. 1993;73(2):62-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/73.2.62
  9. Greenfield B. Evaluation of overuse syndromes. In: Dnatelli, R.The Biomechanics of the foot and ankle. FA. Davis Co. 1990:162.
  10. Hazel MC. Musculoskeletal assesment. Joint range of motion and manual muscle strength. 2nd ed. Seoul. Korea. Yeong Mun Publishing Company. 2004:328-9
  11. Hollinshead WH. The back & Limbs. 2nd ed. New York. U.S.A. Hoeber Medical Division. Harper& Row. Publishers. 1969:787-803.
  12. Joseph FS, Denise K, Arlette P et al. The effect of knee and foot position on the electromyographical activity of the superficial quadriceps. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;22(1):2-9. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1995.22.1.2
  13. Joseph PM, Daniel S, Ronald VC. Leg rotation and vastus medialis obilique/vastus lateralis electromyogram activity ratio during closed chain kinetic exercise prescribed for patellofemoral pain. J Athl Train. 1997;32(3):216-20.
  14. Lieb FJ, Perry J. Quadriceps function: An anatomical and mechanical study using amputated limbs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1968;50(8):1535-48. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-196850080-00003
  15. Mademli L, Arampatzis A, Morey-Klapsing G et al. Effect of ankle joint position and electrode placement on the estimation of the antagonistic moment during maximal plantarflexion. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14(5):591-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.03.006
  16. Milner M, Dall D, McConnell VA et al. Angle diagrams in the assessment of locomotor function. Studies on normal subjects for various speeds and some preliminary work on patients requiring total hip reconstruction (Charnley low-friction arthroplasty). S Afr Med J. 1973;47(22):951-7.
  17. Morse CI, Thom JM, Mian OS et al. Muscle strength, volume and activation following 12-month resistance training in 70-year-old males. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;95(2-3):197-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-005-1342-3
  18. Morse CI, Thom JM, Reeves ND et al. In vivo physiological cross-sectional area and specific force are reduced in the gastrocnemius of elderly men. J Appl Physiol. 2005;99(3):1050-5. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01186.2004
  19. Nions JC, Irrgang JJ, Burdett R et al. Electromyographic analysis of the squat performed in selfselected lower extremity neutral rotation and 30 degrees of lower extremity turn-out from the selfselected neutral position. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997;25(5):307-15. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1997.25.5.307
  20. Nokin CC, White DW. Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. Philadelphia, FA DAvis. 1985:249-53.
  21. Olerud C, Berg P. The variation of the Q angle with different positions of the foot. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;(191):162-5.
  22. Signorile JF, Kacsik D, Perry A et al. The effect of knee and foot position on the electromygraphical activity of the superficial quadriceps. Phys Ther. 1995;22(1):2-9.
  23. Soderberg GL. Kinesiology. 1st ed. Baltimore. U.S.A. Williams & Wilkins. 1997:243-6.
  24. Stiehl J. Biomechanics of the ankle. In: Stiehl, J(ed): Inman's Joints of the Ankle. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore. 1991:278-94.
  25. Williams PL, Warwick R. Gray's Anatomy. 38th ed. WB Saunders. Philadelphia. 1995:366-89.