DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reliability analysis and evaluation of LRFD resistance factors for CPT-based design of driven piles

  • Lee, Junhwan (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Minki (Kumho Engineering and Construction) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Hwan (Department of Mathematics, Illinois Wesleyan University)
  • Received : 2009.01.09
  • Accepted : 2009.03.04
  • Published : 2009.03.25

Abstract

There has been growing agreement that geotechnical reliability-based design (RBD) is necessary for establishing more advanced and integrated design system. In this study, resistance factors for LRFD pile design using CPT results were investigated for axially loaded driven piles. In order to address variability in design methodology, different CPT-based methods and load-settlement criteria, popular in practice, were selected and used for evaluation of resistance factors. A total of 32 data sets from 13 test sites were collected from the literature. In order to maintain the statistical consistency of the data sets, the characteristic pile load capacity was introduced in reliability analysis and evaluation of resistance factors. It was found that values of resistance factors considerably differ for different design methods, load-settlement criteria, and load capacity components. For the total resistance, resistance factors for LCPC method were higher than others, while those for Aoki-Velloso's and Philipponnat's methods were in similar ranges. In respect to load-settlement criteria, 0.1B and Chin's criteria produced higher resistance factors than DeBeer's and Davisson's criteria. Resistance factors for the base and shaft resistances were also presented and analyzed.

Keywords

References

  1. AASHTO (1998), LRFD highway bridges design specifications, SI Units, 2nd Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transfortation Officials, Washington, DC.
  2. Altaee, A., Fellenius, B.H. and Evgin, E. (1992), "Axial load transfer for piles in sand I: tests on an instrumented precast pile", Can. Geotech. J., 29(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1139/t92-002
  3. Aoki, N. and Velloso, D.A. (1975), "An approximate method to estimate the bearing capacity of piles", Proceedings of 5th Pan-American Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Bueno Aires, 1, 367-376.
  4. Bea, R.G. (1983), "Characterization of the reliability of offshore piles subjected to axial loadings", Proceedings of ASCE Structural Congress, Houston, Texas, October.
  5. Briaud, J.L., Tucker, L.M. and Ng, E. (1989a), "Axially loaded 5 pile group and single pile in sand", Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, 1121-1124.
  6. Briaud, J.L., Moore, B.H. and Mitchell, G.B. (1989b), "Analysis of pile load tests at rock and dam 26", Proceedings of the Foundation Engineering Congress: Current Principles and Practices, Evanston, Ill, June, 25-29.
  7. Bustamante, M. and Gianeselli, L. (1982), "Pile bearing capacity prediction by means of static penetrometer CPT", Proceedings of 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, 493-500.
  8. Chin, F.K. (1970), "Estimation of the ultimate load of piles not carried to failure", Proceedings 2nd Southeast Asian Conference on Soil Engineering, 81-90.
  9. Davisson, M.T. (1972), "High capacity piles", Proceedings of Lecture Series: Innovation in Foundation Construction, ASCE, Illinois Section, 52.
  10. DeBeer, E. (1988), "Different behavior of bored and driven piles", Proceedings of the 2nd International Geotechnical Seminar on Deep Foundations on Bored and Auger Piles, Ghent, Belgium, 47-82.
  11. Decourt, L. and Niyama, S. (1994), "Predicted and measured behavior of displacement piles in residual soils", Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, New Delhi, January, 2, 477-486.
  12. Eurocode 7 (1993), Geotechnical design forth and final draft. European Committee for Standardization, TC 250/SC7.
  13. Fellenius, B.H, Harris, D. and Anderson, D.G. (2004), "Static loading test on a 45m long pipe pile in Sandpoint, Idaho", Can. Geotech. J., 41(4), 613-628. https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-012
  14. Franke, E. (1989), "Co-report to discussion, session B, on large diameter piles", Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  15. Harris, D., Anderson, D.G., Fellenius, B.H., Butler, J.J. and Fischer, G.S. (2003), "Design of pile foundations for the sand creek byway, Sandpoint, Idaho", Proceedings of Deep Foundation Institute Annual Meeting, Miami, October. http://www.fellenius.net/.
  16. Kousoftas, D.C. (2002), "High capacity piles in very dense sands", Proceedings of the International Deep Foundations Congress, Orlando, February, 1, 632-646.
  17. Kruizinga, J. and Nelissen, H.A. (1985), "Behavior of board and auger piles in normally consolidated soils", Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, August, 3, 1417-1420.
  18. Kulhawy, F.H. and Trautman, C.H. (1996), "Estimation of in-situ test uncertainty", Proceedings of Uncertainty '96, Madison, July, 269-286.
  19. Lee, J.H., Salgado, R. and Paik, K.H. (2003), "Estimation of load capacity of pipe piles in sand based on cone penetration test results", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 129(6), 391-403. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:6(391)
  20. Matsumoto, T., Kusakabe, O., Suzuki, M. and Shogaki, T. (1993), "Soil parameter selection for serviceability limit design of a pile foundation in a soft rock", Proceedings of the International Symposium on Limit State Design in Geotechnical Engineering, Copenhagen, May, 1, 1-12.
  21. Orchant, C.J., Kulhawy, F.H. and Trautmann, C.H. (1988), Reliability-based foundation design for transmission line structures volume 2: critical evaluation of in-situ test methods, EL-5507 Final Report, Report Prepared by Cornell University, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
  22. Philipponnat, G. (1980), "Methode prtique de calculd'un pieu isole a l'aide du penetrometre statique", Revue Francaise de Geotechnique, 10, 55-64.
  23. Rollins, K.M., Miller, N.P. and Hemenway, D. (1999), "Evaluation of CPT pile capacity prediction methods from I-15 load tests", Transport. Res. Record, 1675, 40-49. https://doi.org/10.3141/1675-06
  24. Schmertmann, J.H. (1978), Guideline for cone penetration test, performance and design. U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA-TS-78-209.
  25. Van Impe, W., DeBeer, E.E. and Louisberg, E. (1988), "Prediction of single pile bearing capacity in granular soils from CPT results", Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Penetration Testing, Orlando, March, 1-34.
  26. Vesic, A.S. (1970), "Tests on instrumented piles, Ogeechee river site", J. Soil Mech. Found. Division, 96(SM2), 561-584.
  27. Withiam, J.L., Voytko, E.P., Barker, R.M., Duncan, J.M., Kelly, B.C., Musser, S.C. and Elias, V. (2001), Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) for highway bridge substructures. Publication No FHWA HI-98-032, NHI Course No.13068, Fedral Highway Administration, Washington D.C.
  28. Witzel, M. and Kempfert, H.J. (2005), "A simple approach to predict the load settlement behavior of precast driven piles with due consideration of the driving process", Geotech. Special Publication, ASCE, 17, 134-156.

Cited by

  1. An experimental procedure for evaluating the consolidation state of marine clay deposits using shear wave velocity vol.7, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2011.7.4.289
  2. Numerical simulation of set-up around shaft of XCC pile in clay vol.21, pp.5, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.21.5.489