DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fundamental restrictions for the closed-loop control of wind-loaded, slender bridges

  • Kirch, Arno (Institute of Steel Structures, Technische Universitat Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig) ;
  • Peil, Udo (Institute of Steel Structures, Technische Universitat Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig)
  • Received : 2008.09.01
  • Accepted : 2009.06.16
  • Published : 2009.09.25

Abstract

Techniques for stabilising slender bridges under wind loads are presented in this article. A mathematically consistent description of the acting aerodynamic forces is essential when investigating these ideas. Against this background, motion-induced aerodynamic forces are characterised using a linear time-invariant transfer element in terms of rational functions. With the help of these functions, the aeroelastic system can be described in the form of a linear, time-invariant state-space model. It is shown that the divergence wind speed constitutes an upper bound for the application of the selected mechanical actuators. Even active control with full state feedback cannot overcome this limitation. The results are derived and explained with methods of control theory.

Keywords

References

  1. Abel, I. (1979), "An analytical technique for predicting the characteristics of a flexible wing equipped with an active flutter-suppression system and comparison with wind-tunnel data", NASA-TP-1367, Technical Paper, NASA.
  2. Astrom, K.H. and Wittenmark, B. (1995), Adaptive Control, 2nd Edition, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
  3. Buchek, P.M. (1974), "Modern control techniques in active flutter suppression using a control moment gyro", NASA-CR-138494, Contractor Report, NASA.
  4. Ferry, E.S. (1932), Applied Gyrodynamics, Wiley, New York.
  5. Fujisawa, N. (1995), "Control of coupled flutter of a bridge deck by mechanical damper", 50th Annual Conf. of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Tokyo, Japan, 1508-1509, (in Japanese).
  6. Hautus, M.L.J. (1969), "Controllability and observability conditions of linear autonomous systems", Indagationes Mathematicae, 31, 443-448.
  7. Jacot, A.D. and Liska, D.J. (1966), "Control moment gyros in attitude control", J. Spacecraft Rockets, 3(9), 1313-1320. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.28653
  8. Karpel, M. (1981), "Design for active and passive flutter suppression and gust alleviation", NASA-CR-3482, Contractor Report, NASA.
  9. Kautsky, J. and Nichols, N.K. (1985), "Robust pole assignment in linear state feedback", Int. J. Control, 41, 1129-1155. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020718508961188
  10. Kirch, A., Peil, U. and Borri, C. (2009a), "Limits for the control of wind-loaded slender bridges with movable flaps; Part I: Aerodynamic modelling, state-space model and open-loop characteristics of the aeroelastic system", EACWE 5 - Proc. of the 5th European and African Conf. on Wind Engineering EACWE 5, Florence, Italy.
  11. Kirch, A., Peil, U. and Borri, C. (2009b), "Limits for the control of wind-loaded slender bridges with movable flaps; Part II: Controller design, closed-loop characteristics of the aeroelastic system and gust alleviation", EACWE 5 - Proc. of the 5th European and African Conf. on Wind Engineering EACWE 5, Florence, Italy.
  12. Korlin, R. and Starossek, U. (2004), "Active mass dampers for flutter control of bridges", Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Flow-Induced Vibration, Paris, France.
  13. Korlin, R. and Starossek, U. (2007), "Wind tunnel test of an active mass damper for bridge decks", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 95(4), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2006.06.015
  14. Kussner, H.G. and Schwarz, L. (1940), "Der schwingende Flugel mit aerodynamisch ausgeglichenem Ruder", Luftfahrtforschung, 17, 337-354 (in German).
  15. Lin, Y., Cheng, C. and Lee, C. (1999), "Multiple tuned mass dampers for controlling coupled buffeting and flutter of long-span bridges", Wind Struct., 2, 267-284. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.1999.2.4.267
  16. Meirovitch, L. and Ghosh, D. (1987), "Control of flutter in bridges", J. Eng. Mech., 113(5), 720-736. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:5(720)
  17. Miyata, T., Yamada, H., Dung, N.N. and Kazama, K. (1994), "On active control and structural response control of the coupled flutter problem for long span bridges", First World Conf. on Structural Control, Los Angeles, WA4-40 - WA4-49.
  18. Murata, M. and Ito, M. (1971), "Suppression of wind-induced vibration of a suspension bridge by means of a gyroscope", Third Int. Conf. on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, Tokyo, 1057-1066.
  19. Okada, T., Honke, K., Sugii, K. and Shimada, S. (2003), "Aerodynamic stability improvements in super-long-span suspension bridge through the use of gyroscopic dampers", Kobe Steel Engineering Reports, 53(1), 59- 63, (in Japanese).
  20. Okada, T., Honke, K., Sugii, K., Shimada, S. and Kobayashi, H. (2001), "Suppression of coupled flutter of a bridge deck by gyroscopic damper", IABSE Conf. on Cable-Supported Bridges, Seoul, South Korea.
  21. Peil, U. and Kirch, A. (2008), "Approximation of unsteady aerodynamic derivatives by rational functions", EURODYN 2008 - 7th European Conf. on Structural Dynamics, Southampton, UK, Paper E181.
  22. Pourzeynali, S. and Datta, T.K. (2002), "Control of flutter of suspension bridge deck using TMD", Wind Struct., 5, 407-422. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2002.5.5.407
  23. Pourzeynali, S. and Datta, T.K. (2005), "Control of suspension bridge flutter instability using pole-placement technique", J. Sound Vib., 282, 89-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.02.048
  24. Roger, K. (1977), "Airplane math modelling methods for active control design", Structural Aspects of Active Controls - AGARD Conf. Proceedings, 228, 4-1−4-11.
  25. Seyranian, A., Stoustrup, J. and Kliem, W. (1995), "On gyroscopic stabilization", Zeitschrift fur angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 46, 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00944756
  26. Simiu, E. and Scanlan, R.H. (1996), Wind Effects on Structures: Fundamentals and Applications to Design, 3rd Edition, Wiley, New York.
  27. Theodorsen, T. (1934), "General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter", NACA TR-496, Technical Report, NACA.
  28. Theodorsen, T. and Garrick, I.E. (1941), "Nonstationary flow about a wing-aileron-tab combination including aerodynamic balance", NACA TR-736, Technical Report, NACA.
  29. Tiffany Hoadley, S. and Adams Jr., W.M. (1988), "Nonlinear programming extensions to rational function approximation methods for unsteady aerodynamic forces", NASA-TP-2776, Technical Paper, NASA.
  30. Wilde, K. and Fujino, Y. (1998), "Aerodynamic control of bridge deck flutter by active surfaces", J. Eng. Mech., 124(7), 718-727. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:7(718)

Cited by

  1. Aeroelastic divergence and flutter: Critical comments on the regulations of EN 1991-1-4 vol.99, pp.12, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.09.007
  2. Transfer function approximation of motion-induced aerodynamic forces with rational functions vol.14, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2011.14.2.133
  3. Analytical and experimental study on aerodynamic control of flutter and buffeting of bridge deck by using mechanically driven flaps vol.46, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.46.4.549
  4. Limitations for the control of wind-loaded slender bridges with movable flaps vol.15, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2012.15.5.441