DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Condition assessment of reinforced concrete bridges using structural health monitoring techniques - A case study

  • Mehrani, E. (DCI Solutions Inc.) ;
  • Ayoub, A. (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Houston) ;
  • Ayoub, A. (PBS&G)
  • Received : 2008.08.20
  • Accepted : 2008.09.21
  • Published : 2009.07.25

Abstract

The paper presents a case study in which the structural condition assessment of the East Bay bridge in Gibsonton, Florida is evaluated with the help of remote health monitoring techniques. The bridge is a four-span, continuous, deck-type reinforced concrete structure supported on prestressed pile bents, and is instrumented with smart Fiber Optic Sensors. The sensors used for remote health monitoring are the newly emerged Fabry-Perot (FP), and are both surface-mounted and embedded in the deck. The sensing system can be accessed remotely through fast Digital Subscriber Lines (DSL), which permits the evaluation of the bridge behavior under live traffic loads. The bridge was open to traffic since March 2005, and the collected structural data have been continuously analyzed since. The data revealed an increase in strain readings, which suggests a progression in damage. Recent visual observations also indicated the presence of longitudinal cracks along the bridge length. After the formation of these cracks, the sensors readings were analyzed and used to extrapolate the values of the maximum stresses at the crack location. The data obtained were also compared to initial design values of the bridge under factored gravity and live loads. The study showed that the proposed structural health monitoring technique proved to provide an efficient mean for condition assessment of bridge structures providing it is implemented and analyzed with care.

Keywords

References

  1. AASHTO (1970), Manual for maintenance inspection of bridges, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
  2. AASHTO (1978), Manual for maintenance inspection of bridges, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
  3. AASHTO (2004), LRFD bridge design specifications, third edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
  4. Aktan, A.E., Grimmelsman, K.A., Barrish, R.A., Catbas, F.N. and Tsikos, C.J. (2000), Structural identification of a long span truss bridge, TRR No. 1696, National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 210-218.
  5. Ansari, F. (2005), "Sensing issues in civil structural health monitoring", Proc. of NSF Workshop in Civil Structural Health Monitoring, Springer publishing, 527.
  6. Bastianini, F., Matta, F., Rizzo, A., Galati, N. and Nanni, A. (2007), "Overview of recent bridge monitoring applications using distributed brillouin fiber optic sensors", Nondestruct. Test., 12(9), 269-276.
  7. Benmokrane, B., EI-Salakawy, E.F., ElRagaby, A., Lackey, T. and Desgagne, G. (2006), "Design and testing of concrete bridges reinforced with glass FRP bars", J. Bridge Eng. ASCE, 11(2), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:2(217)
  8. Brownjohn, J.M.W. (2003), "Lessons from monitoring the performance of highway bridges", Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Advanced Sensors, Structural Health Monitoring and Smart Structures.
  9. Casciati, F. (2003), "An overview of structural health monitoring expertise within the European Union", Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructure, Lisse, Balkema, 31-37.
  10. Catbas, F.N., Lenett, M., Aktan, A.E., Brown, D.L., Helmicki, A.J. and Hunt, V. (1998), "Damage detection and condition assessment of seymour bridge", Proc. of the 16th Int. Modal Analysis Conf., Santa Barbara, California.
  11. CEB (1985), "Cracking and deformations", Bulletin D'information No. 158, Comite Euro-International du Beton, Paris, France.
  12. Cheung, M.S. and Naumoski, N. (2002), "The first smart long-span bridge in Canada - health monitoring of the confederation bridge", Proc. of the 1st Int. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring of Innovative Civil Engineering Structures, Winnipeg, Canada, 31-44.
  13. Choquet, P., Juneau, F. and Dadoun, F. (1999), "New generation of Fiber-Optic sensors for dam monitoring", Presented at the '99 Int. Conf. on Dam Safety and Monitoring, Three Gorge Project Site, Yichang, Hubei, China.
  14. Florida Department of Transportation (2000), Standard specification for road and bridge construction and supplemental.
  15. Fujino, Y. and Abe, M. (2004), "Structural health monitoring-current status and future", Proc. of the 2nd European workshop on structural health monitoring, Lancaster, 3-10.
  16. Hipley, P. (2001), "Caltrans' current state-of-practice", Proc. of Instrumental Systems for Diagnostics of Seismic Response of Bridges and Dams, Richmond, CA, 3-7.
  17. Idriss, R.L., Kersey, A.D. and Davis, M. (1997), "Highway bridge monitoring using optical fiber sensors", Geotechnical News, 15(1), 43-45.
  18. Ko, J.M. and Ni, Y.Q. (2005), "Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges", Eng. Struct., 27, 1715-1725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.021
  19. Koh, H.M., Choo, J.F., Kim, S.K. and Kim, C.Y. (2003), "Recent application and development of structural health monitoring systems and intelligent structures in Korea", Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructure, Lisse, Balkema, 99-111.
  20. Krauss, P.D. and Rogalla, E.A. (1996), "Transverse cracking in newly constructed bridge decks", NCHRP Report No. 380, Transportation Research Board, National Report Council, Washington D. C., 126.
  21. LRFD Live Load Generator Version 2.41 (2005), Florida Department of Transportation.
  22. Lynch, J.P. and Loh, K. (2005), "A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring", Shock Vib., 38(2), 91-128.
  23. MathCAD 11 (2002), Mathsoft Engineering & Education, Inc.
  24. Mehrani, E. (2006), "Evaluation of AASHTO design specifications for cast-in-place continuous bridge decks using remote sensing techniques", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of South Florida.
  25. Mehrani, E., Ayoub, A.S. and Ayoub, A. (2008), "Evaluation of fiber optic sensors for remote health monitoring of bridge structures", J. Mater. Struct., in press and available online.
  26. Mufti, A.A., Tadros, G. and Jones, P.R. (1997), "Field assessment of fiber-optic bragg grating strain sensors in the confederation bridge", Can. J. Civil Eng., 24, 963-966. https://doi.org/10.1139/l97-080
  27. Ou, J. (2004), "The state-of-the-art and application of intelligent health monitoring systems for civil infrastructures in mainland of China", Progress in Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation, London, 599-608.
  28. Perdikaris, P.C., Petrou, M.F. and Wang, A. (1993), "Fatigue strength and stiffness of reinforced concrete bridge decks", Final Report to ODOT, FHWA/OH-93/016, Dept. of Civil Eng., Case Western Reserve, Cleveland Ohio.
  29. Sikorsky, C., Stubbs, N. and Karbhari, V. (2003), "Automation of damage index method to evaluate structural safety", Proc. of the Thirteenth Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., Honolulu, Hawaii.
  30. Straser, E.K. and Kiremidjian, A.S. (1998), "A Modular, wireless damage monitoring system for structures", Report No. 128, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University.
  31. Wang, M.L. (2004), "State-of-the-art applications in health monitoring", Workshop on Basics of Structural Health Monitoring and Optical Sensing Technologies in Civil Engineering, Taiwan, National Central University, 113-142.
  32. Wu, Z.S. (2003), "Structural health monitoring and intelligent infrastructures in Japan", Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructure, Tokyo, Japan, 1, 153-167.
  33. Yun, C.B., Lee, J.J., Kim, S.K. and Kim, J.W. (2003), "Recent R & D activities on structural health monitoring for civil infra-structures in Korea", KSCE J. Civil Eng., 7(6), 637-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829136

Cited by

  1. Smart-aggregate-based damage detection of fiber-reinforced-polymer-strengthened columns under reversed cyclic loading vol.20, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/20/7/075014
  2. The combined deterministic stochastic subspace based system identification in buildings vol.38, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.38.3.315