DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An improved pushover analysis procedure for multi-mode seismic performance evaluation of bridges: (2) Correlation study for verification

  • Kwak, Hyo-Gyoung (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Shin, Dong Kyu (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2009.01.29
  • Accepted : 2009.08.13
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

In the companion paper, a simple but effective analysis procedure termed an Improved Modal Pushover Analysis (IMPA) is proposed to estimate the seismic capacities of multi-span continuous bridge structures on the basis of the modal pushover analysis, which considers all the dynamic modes of a structure. In contrast to previous studies, the IMPA maintains the simplicity of the capacity-demand curve method and gives a better estimation of the maximum dynamic response in a bridge structure. Nevertheless, to verify its applicability, additional parametric studies for multi-span continuous bridges with large differences in the length of adjacent piers are required. This paper, accordingly, concentrates on a parametric study to review the efficiency and limitation in the application of IMPA to bridge structures through a correlation study between various analytical models including the equivalent single-degree-of-freedom method (ESDOF) and modal pushover analysis (MPA) that are usually used in the seismic design of bridge structures. Based on the obtained numerical results, this paper offers practical guidance and/or limitations when using IMPA to predict the seismic response of a bridge effectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Chopra, A.K. (2001), "Dynamics of structures: Theory and application to earthquake engineering", Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  2. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2002), "A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings.", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31, 561-582. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.144
  3. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2004), "A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings.", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33, 903-927. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.380
  4. Freeman, S.A. (1998), Development and Use of Capacity Spectrum Method, Proceedings of 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Seattle, EERI, Oakland, California.
  5. Krawinkler, H. and Seneviratna, G.D.P.K. (1998), "Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation", Eng. Struct., 20(4-6), 452-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00092-8
  6. Lawson, R.S., Vance, V. and Krawinkler, H. (1994), "Nonlinear static pushover analysis-why, when and how?", Proceedings of the 5th U.S. Conf. Earthq. Eng., 1, 283-292.
  7. Ministry of Construction and Transportation (2000), Standard Specification for Highway Bridges. 2nd ed., Korea Road & Transportation Association.
  8. Nawrocki, P.A. (2009), "Alterations of breakdown and collapse pressures due to material nonlinearities", Geomech. Eng., 1(2), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2009.1.2.155
  9. OpenSees Development Team (1998-2002), OpenSees: Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, http://opensees.berkeley.edu/, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

Cited by

  1. 비선형 정적 해석법을 이용한 사장교의 지진해석 vol.31, pp.a2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12652/ksce.2011.31.2a.059