Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제9권6호
  • /
  • Pages.519-534
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An experiment on compressive profile of the unstiffened steel plate-concrete structures under compression loading

  • 투고 : 2009.02.25
  • 심사 : 2009.10.20
  • 발행 : 2009.11.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study intends to examine the characteristics of compressive behavior and conducts comparative analysis between normal compressive strength under existing equations (LRFD, ACI 318, EC 4) and experimental the maximum compressive strength from the compression experiment for the unstiffened steel plate-concrete structures. The six specimens were made to evaluate the constraining factor (${\xi}$) and width ratio (${\beta}$) effects subjected to the compressive monotonic loading. Based on this experiments, the following conclusions could be made: first, compressive behaviors of the specimens from the finite element analysis closely agreed with the ones from the actual experiments; second, the higher the width ratio (${\beta}$) was, the lower the ductility index (DI) was; and third, the test results showed the maximum compressive strength with a margin by 7% compared to the existing codes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ABAQUS, Inc (2004), ABAQUS Standard User's Manual, ABAQUS Version 6.5.
  2. American Concrete Institute (ACI) (2005), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, American concrete Institute, Detroit.
  3. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) (2005), Load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc, Chicago.
  4. British Standards Institution (2004), Eurocode 4, "Design of Composite steel and Concrete Structures, Part 1.1: General Rules and Rules for Building", DD-ENV 1994-1-1, London.
  5. Choi, B.J., et al. (2008), "Compression Tests for Unstiffened Steel Plate-Concrete Structures with Variation of B/t Ratio", J. Kor. Soc. Steel Constr., 20(4), 549-559.
  6. Corus (2003), Bi-Steel Design & Construction Guide, 2nd Edition.
  7. Corus (2004), An introduction to the Corefast system, www.corusconstruction.com.
  8. Corus (2006), Corefast selected for new 18-storey Birmingham tower, www.bi-steel.com/news.
  9. Han, L.H. (2002), "Tests on stub columns of concrete-filled RHS sections", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 58(3), 353-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00059-1
  10. Han, L.H., Zhao, X.L. and Tao, Z. (2001), "Tests and mechanics model for concrete-filled SHS stub columns, columns and beam-columns", Steel Compos. Struct., 1(1), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.1296/SCS2001.01.01.04
  11. JEAG 4618 (2005), Technical Guidelines for Seismic Design of Steel Plate Concrete Structures: for Buildings and Structures.
  12. Kanchi, M., et al. (1996), "Experimental Study on A Concrete Filled Steel Structure, Part 2., Compressive Test(1)", Architectural Institute of Japan Conf., pp 1071-1072.
  13. Liang, Q.Q., Uy, B. and Richard Liew, J.Y. (2006), "Nonlinear analysis of concrete-filled thin-walled steel box columns with local buckling effects", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 62(6), 581-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.09.007
  14. Miyauchi, Y., et al. (1996), "Experimental Study on A Concrete Filled Steel Structure, Part 3 Compressive Test(2)", Architectural Institute of Japan Conf., pp 1073-1074.
  15. Saadeghvaziri, M.A. and Shams, M. (1997), "Nonlinear Modeling and Evaluation of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Columns", ABAQUS Users Conf. Proc., 6, 667-680.
  16. Shams, M. and Saadeghvaziri, M.A. (1999), "Nonlinear Response of Concrete-filled Steel Tubular Columns Under Axial Loading", ACI Struct. J., 96(7), 1009-1017.
  17. Tao, Z., Han, L.H. and Wang, D.Y. (2008), "Strength and ductility of stiffened thin-walled hollow steel structural stub columns filled with concrete", Thin-Wall. Struct., 46(10), 1113-1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2008.01.007
  18. Uy, B. (2001), "Strength of short concrete filled high strength steel box columns", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 57(2), 113-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(00)00014-6
  19. Uy, B. and Bradford, M.A. (1996), "Elastic local buckling of steel plates in composite steel-concrete members", Eng. Struct., 18(3), 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(95)00143-3
  20. Vrcelj, Z. and Uy, B. (2002), "Strength of slender concrete-filled steel box columns incorporating local buckling", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 58(2), 275-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00045-1

피인용 문헌

  1. Strength of double skin steel-concrete composite walls vol.17, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-017-6013-9
  2. Experimental evaluation of bending-moment performance about steel plate-concrete structures with mechanical splice vol.128, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.09.007
  3. Effect of shear connectors on local buckling and composite action in steel concrete composite walls vol.269, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.08.035
  4. Steel-plate composite (SC) walls for safety related nuclear facilities: Design for in-plane forces and out-of-plane moments vol.269, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.09.019
  5. Compressive performance with variation of yield strength and width-thickness ratio for steel plate-concrete wall structures vol.14, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2013.14.5.473
  6. Strength and behavior of steel plate–concrete wall structures using ordinary and eco-oriented cement concrete under axial compression vol.84, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2014.07.008
  7. Shear strength of connections between open and closed steel-concrete composite sandwich structures vol.11, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2011.11.2.169
  8. Determination of Slenderness Ratio of Faceplates in Steel-Plate Composite Wall Panels vol.23, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0144-1
  9. Height-thickness ratio on axial behavior of composite wall with truss connector vol.30, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.30.4.315
  10. PERFORMANCE STUDY OF SC WALL BASED ON EXPERIMENT AND PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS vol.26, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12181
  11. Compressive behavior of rectangular sandwich composite wall with different truss spacings vol.34, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.6.783
  12. Structural behavior of sandwich composite wall with truss connectors under compression vol.35, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.35.2.159
  13. Effect of height-to-width ratio on composite wall under compression vol.36, pp.5, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.36.5.507