Effect of Diniconazol Treatment on the Inhibition of Over-Growth of Tomato Seedlings

Diniconazol의 처리 시기 및 농도가 토마토 묘의 도장억제에 미치는 영향

  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

This study intends to examine the influence of foliage treatment and seed treatment on the suppression of the succulent growth of tomato seedlings, and further, to clarify the proper way of suppressing the succulent growth of tomatoes. For the foliage treatment, the time and the concentration of diniconazol treatment were considered, and for the seed treatment, the soaking time was considered. As a result of examining the stem elongation of tomatoes based on the time and the concentration of diniconazol treatment, suppression of stem elongation and internodal length was found in step 1, 2, and 3. Plants absorb more quantity of a chemical when they are young, so a good chemical effect was found. In step 1, the number of suppressed nodes was 4, which was decreased to 3 in step 2 and to 2 in step 3. As a result of examining the influence of chemical tenacity on stem elongation, $5\;mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$ in step 1 and 2 showed the suppression of stem elongation after chemical treatment, but it became recovered fast after a particular time, compared with others. In step 3, the period of stem elongation suppression was short and they were recovered fast. In step 1, the effect of chemical tenacity was found for 5 weeks, but in step 2 and 3, it lasted for 4 weeks respectively. After raising seedlings was finished, they got planted and the quantity of living bodies increased fast so there was no significant difference in breeding from non-treatment.

본 연구는 토마토의 도장 억제를 위하여 보다 안정적인 건묘를 생산하고자 육묘 기간 중 diniconazol 처리시기 처리농도에 따른 경엽처리와 침지 시간에 따른 종자처리가 묘 도장 억제에 미치는 영향을 알아보고 적정 방법을 구명하고자 수행하였다. Diniconazol 처리시기 및 처리농도에 따른 토마토의 초장 신장을 본 결과 1단계 2단계 3단계로 초장의 신장과 절간장 억제가 잘 나타났다. 이는 이른 시기가 늦은 시기보다 식물체가 받는 약제의 양이 더 많기 때문에 약제 효과가 잘 나타났다. 1단계는 4절, 2단계, 3단계는 각각 3절, 2절로 억제된 절간수가 줄어들었다. 약제 지속성이 초장의 신장에 미치는 영향을 본 결과 1단계, 2단계 $5mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$은 약제 처리 후 초장의 신장억제가 나타났으나 다른 처리구에 비해 일정한 시간이 지나면 빨리 회복하는 경향이 나타났다. 3단계에서는 초장 신장 억제 기간이 짧았고 빠른 회복을 보였다. 1단계는 5주, 2단계, 3단계는 각각 4주정도 약제 지속효과가 나타났다. 육묘 종료 후 정식한 결과 생체량이 빨리 증가 되어 생육에는 무처리와 유의차가 없었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aguirre, R. and A. blanco. 1992. Patern of histological differentiation induced by paclobutrazol and $GA_3$ inpeah shoots. Acta Hort. 315:7-12
  2. Burrows, G.E., T.S. Boag, and W.P. Stewart. 1992. Changes in leaf, stem, and root anatomy of chrysantheum cv.Lillian Hoek folowing paclobutrazol application. J. Plant Growth Reg. 11:189-194 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02115476
  3. Hunter, D.M. and J.T.A. Proctor. 1992. Pacrobutrazol affects growth and fruit composition of potted grapevines. HortScience. 27:319-321
  4. Davis, T.D., G.L. Steffens, and N. Sankhla. 1988. Triazole plant growth regulator. Hort. Rev. 10:63-105
  5. Flecter, R.A., A. Gilley, N. Sankla, and T.D. Davis. 1997. Triazoles as plant growth regulators and stress protoctants. Horticultural Review 24:55-139
  6. Fisher, P.R., R.D. Heins, and J.H. Lieth. 1996. Modeling the stem elongation response of poinsettia to chlormequat. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121:861-868
  7. Gibertz, D.A. 1992. Chrysanthemum response to timing of pacrobutrazol and uniconazole sprays. Hort-Science 27:322-323
  8. Gent., M.P.N. 1997. Persistence of triazole growth retardants on stem elngation of Rhododendron and Kalmia. J. Plant Growth Regul. 16:197-203 https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006996
  9. Kim, S.E. and J.M. Lee. 1997. Analysis of the auxinlike activity in triazole chemicals. These collection in celebration of Dr. Young Seek. Choue's seventy-seventh Birthday, pp. 1029-1037
  10. Lee, J.M., E.J. Bae, C.W. Lee, and S.S. Kwon. 1999. Seedling growthand fruit set and quality of cucumber as affected by triazole chemicals. Acta Hort. 483:125-132
  11. McPaniel, G.L. 1983. Growth radiation activity of paclobutrazol of chrysanthemum. HortScience. 18:199-200
  12. Pasian, C.C. and M.A. Bennett, 2001. Pacrobutrazol soaked marigold, geranium, and tomato seeds produce short seedlings. HortSciece. 36:721-723
  13. Rademacher, W. and J. Jung. 1986. GA biosyntheis inhibitors-An uptake inhibitors of GA biosynthesis. Plant Growth Reg. Soc. Amer. B:102-114
  14. Strerrett, J.P. 1985. Pacrobutrazol: a promising growth inhibitor for injection into woody plants. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110:4-8
  15. Steffens, G.L. and S.Y. Wang. 1985. Persistance of several triazol GA biosythesis inhitors for retarding growth of young apple plant. Plant Growth Reg. Soc. Amer. 12:248
  16. Suh, S.G. and H.D. Chung. 1986. Effect of pacrobutrazol on growth and tolerance to chilling and drought stress in cucumber plant (Cucumis sativus L.). J. Kor, Soc. Hort. Sci. 27:111-118
  17. Steinberg, S.L., J.M. Zajicek, and M.J. McFarland. 1991. Short-term effect of uniconazole on the water relations and growth of Ligustrum. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116:460-464
  18. Sekimoto, H., K. Matsuura, and T. Yoshino. 1998. Relation between the greening of leaves by the treatment with a gibberellin-biosynthesis inhibitor and leaf area and nitrogen content in cucmis sativus L.J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 67:270-272 https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.67.270
  19. Stephens, G.L., S.Y. Wang, M. Faust, and J.K. Byun. 1985. Growth, carbohydrate, and mineral element status of shoot and spur leaves and fruit of 'Spartan' apple trees treated with pacrobutrazol. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110:850-855
  20. Tonkinson, C.L., R.L. Lyndon, G.M. Arnold, and J.R. Lenton. 1995. Effect of Rht3 dwarfing gene on dyhamics of cell extension in wheat leaves, and its modification by gibberellic acid and pacrobutrazol. J. Expt. Bot. 46:1085-1092 https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/46.9.1085
  21. Wample, R.L. and E.B. Culver. 1983. The influence of pacrobutrazol a new growth regulator on sunflower. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108:122-125
  22. Wang, Y. and L.L. Gregg. 1989. Uniconazole affects vegetative growth, flowering, and stem anatomy of hibiscus. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114:927-932