Korean journal of applied entomology (한국응용곤충학회지)

Korean Society of Applied Entomology (한국응용곤충학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Feeding Behavior of Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) and Response on Feeding Stimulants of Some Plants

식물에 대한 꽃매미의 섭식행동과 섭식자극

  • Lee, Jeong-Eun (Dept. of Plant Medicine, Coll. of Agri. Life and Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Moon, Sang-Rae (Dept. of Plant Medicine, Coll. of Agri. Life and Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Ahn, Hee-Geun (Dept. of Plant Medicine, Coll. of Agri. Life and Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Cho, Sun-Ran (Dept. of Plant Medicine, Coll. of Agri. Life and Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Yang, Jeong-Oh (Dept. of Plant Medicine, Coll. of Agri. Life and Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Yoon, Chang-Mann (Dept. of Plant Medicine, Coll. of Agri. Life and Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Gil-Hah (Dept. of Plant Medicine, Coll. of Agri. Life and Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
  • 이정은 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 문상래 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 안희근 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 조선란 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 양정오 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 윤창만 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 김길하 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과)
  • Published : 2009.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Host preference was tested on the 7 species plants against ggot-mae-mi, Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae). This insect highly preferred Ailanthus altissima and Vitis vinifera however, didn't choose the other plants preferentially. Both nymphs and adults lived longest in A. altissima and V. vinifera but lived in short and low ecdysis rate against other plants and 3 species fruits. By analyzing the phloem-feeding behavior using EPG, L. delicatula was showed the short time in non-probing phase and it also exhibit the longest feeding time in A. altissima and V. vinifera, but other plants did not feed the phloem at all. In sugar contents analysis, A. altissima existed high sucrose proportion and followed by fructose>glucose, V. vinifera was analyzed by an order of glucose> fructose>maltose>sucrose>rhamnose, Malus pumila was as glucose> fructose, Pyrus calleryana was as glucose>unkown>fructose, Hibiscus syriacus was as sucrose>glucose. Nymphs and adults of L. delicatula lived longest in 5% sucrose solution, and next is in 5% fructose solution. However, they lived short in other sugar solutions. L. delicatula nymph and adult according to the combination of sugar proportion found in original plants lived longer in sugar combination solution of A. altissima and those of V. vinifera was next. Analyzed original sugar proportion from M. pumila, P. calleryana, H. syriacus respectively, L. delicatula lived short period comparing to the A. altissima, V. vinifera. This result was judged that sugar contents affected on choosing the host plants.

꽃매미의 식물에 대한 선호도을 조사한 결과, 가죽나무와 포도나무를 가장 선호하였으며, 사과나무, 배나무, 무궁화나무, 소나무와 복숭아 나무는 선호하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 7종 식물에 대하여 꽃매미 약충과 성충은 가죽나무와 포도나무에서 가장 오래 생존하였고, 다른 식물에서는 생존기간이 짧았다. 과수열매에서는 거의 생존하지 못하였다. 꽃매미의 섭식행동 분석결과, 약충과 성충 모두 가죽나무와 포도나무에서 섭식하지 않는 시간(non-probing time)은 가장 짧았고, 체관부 섭식시간(phloem-feeding time)은 가장 길었다. 이를 제외한 나머지 식물과 열매에서는 체관부 섭식시간이 0분으로 섭식을 하지 못하였다. 5종 식물을 당 분석한 결과, 가죽나무는 sucrose 함량이 가장 높았고 fructose > glucose순으로, 포도나무에는 glucose > fructose > maltose > sucrose > rhamnose순이고, 사과나무는 glucose > fructose, 배나무는 glucose > unknown > fructose, 무궁화나무는 sucrose > glucose 순으로 당 성분이 존재하였다. Parafilm membrane 검정법으로 생존기간을 조사한 결과, 약충과 성충 모두 sucrose 5%용액에서 가장 생존기간이 길었으며, fructose 5%용액이 그 다음이었다. 이를 제외한 나머지 성분에서는 짧은 수명을 나타내었다. 분석된 당 성분의 조합에 의한 검정에서도 약충과 성충 모두 가죽나무와 포도나무의 당 성분조합에서 다른 당 성분조합과 비교하여 긴 수명을 보였다. 당 성분이 꽃매미가 기주를 선택하고 섭식하는데 영향을 미치는 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bernays, E.A. and S.J. Simpson. 1982. Control of food in-take. Adv. Insect Physiol. 16:59-118 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2806(08)60152-6
  2. Campbell, B.C., D.L. Mclean, M.G. Kinsey, K.C. Jones and D.L Dreyer. 1982. Probing behavior of the greenbug (Schizaphis graminum, biotype C) on resistant and susceptible varieties of sorghum. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 31: 140-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1982.tb03125.x
  3. Davis, J.A. and Radcliffe E.B. 2008. Reproduction and feeding behavior of Myzus persicae on four cereals. J. Econ. Entomol. 101: 9-16 https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493(2008)101[9:RAFBOM]2.0.CO;2
  4. Dixon, A.F.G. 1998. Aphid ecology, 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom
  5. Doi, H. 1932. Miscellaneous notes on insects 1. J. chosen Natural Hist. Soc. 13: 30-49 (In Japanese)
  6. Endo, N., M. Abe, T. Sekine and K. Matsuda. 2004. Feeding stimulants of solanaceae-feeding lady beetle, Epilachna gintioctomaculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) from potato leaves. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 39: 411-416 https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2004.411
  7. Han, J.M., H. Kim, E.J. Lim, S. LEE, Y. J. Kwon and S. Cho. 2008. Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Fulgoridae: Aphaeninae), finally, but suddenly arrived in Korea. Entomol. Res. 38: 281-286 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5967.2008.00188.x
  8. Honda, K., N. Hayashi, F. Abe and T. Yamauchi. 1997. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids mediate host-plant recognition by ovipositing females of an old world danaid butterfly, Idea leuconoe. J. Chem. Ecol. 23: 1703-1713 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006445.61545.82
  9. Hori, M., K. Ohuchi and K. Matsuda. 2006. Role of host plant volatile in the host-finding behavior of the strawberry leaf beetle, Galerucella vittaticollis Baly (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 41: 357-363 https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2006.357
  10. Hsiao, T.H. and Fraenkel 1968. Isolation of phagostimu-lative substances from the host plant of the colorado potato beetle. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 61: 476-484 https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/61.2.476
  11. Jiang, Y.X., H. Lei, J.L. Collar, B. Martin, M. Muniz and A. Ferered. 1999. Proboing and feeding behaviour of two distinct biotypes of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on tomato plants. J. Econ. Entomol. 92: 357-366 https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/92.2.357
  12. Jung, J.K. and D.J. Im. 2005. Feeding inhibition of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae) on a resistant rice variety. J. Asia pacific Entomol. 8: 301-308 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1226-8615(08)60250-2
  13. Khan, Z.R. and R.C. Saxena. 1985. Mode of feeding and growth of Nephotettix virescens (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) on selected resistant and susceptible rice varieties. J. Econ. Entomol 78: 583-587 https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/78.3.583
  14. Kim, N.S., M. J. Seo and Y. N. Youn. 2005. Characteristics of feeding behavior of the rice brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens, using electrical penetration graph (EPG) technique on different rice varieties. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 44: 177-187
  15. Kimmins, F.M., A.G. Cook and S. Woodhead. 1987. Resistance mechanism in rice to the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens stal. proceeding of the sixth international symposium, Insect-plant relationship, pp. 238-288
  16. KFRI., 2007. Annual report of monitoring for forest insect pests and diseases in Korea. 151pp. Korea Forest Research Institute, Sungmunsa, Seoul
  17. Lei, H., J.C. van Lenteren and W.F. Tjallingii. 1999. Analysis of resistance in tomato and sweet pepper against the greenhouse whitefly using electrically monitored and visually observed probing and feeding behaviour. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 92: 299-309 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.1999.00551.x
  18. Lei, H., W.F. Tjallingii, J.C. van Lenteren and R. M. Xu. 1996. Stylet penetration by larvae of the greenhouse whitefly on cucumber. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 79: 77-84 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333824
  19. Luo, S., et al. Effects of six sugars on the longevity, fecundity and nutrient reserves of Microplitis mediator. Biological Control (2009), doi: 10. 1016/j.biocontrol. 2009.09.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.09.002
  20. McLean, D.L. and M.G. Kinsey. 1967. Probing behavior of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. I. Definite correlations of electronically recorded waveforms with aphid probing activities. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 60: 400-406 https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/60.2.400
  21. Miller, J.R. and T.A. Miller. 1986. Insect-plant interactions. 342pp. Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin Heidelberg
  22. Mitsuhashi, J. and K. Koyama. 1969. Survival of smaller brown planthopper, Laodelphax striatellus Fallen, on carbohydrate solutions (Hemiptera: Delphacidae. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 4: 185-193
  23. Mittler, T.E. and R.H. Dadd. 1962. Artificial feeding and rearing of the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer), on a completely defined synthetic diet. Nature 195: 404 https://doi.org/10.1038/195404a0
  24. Naskrecki, P. and K. Nishida. 2007. Novel trophobiotic interactions in lantern burgs (Insecta: Auchenorrhyncha: Fulgoridae). J. Natural Hist. 41(37-40): 2397-2402 https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930701633570
  25. Onagbola, E.O., H.Y. Fadamiro and G.N. Mbata. 2007. Longevity, fecundity and progency sex ratio of Pteromalus cerealellae in relation to diet, host provision and mating. Biol. Con. 40: 222-229 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.10.010
  26. Renwick, J.A. and F. S. Chew. 1994. Oviposition behavior in Lepidoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39: 377-400 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.39.010194.002113
  27. SAS Institute. 2003. SAS/STAT user's guide: statistics, version 9.1 Institute, Cary, N.C., U.S.A
  28. Tjallingii, W.F. 1978. Electrical recording of plant penetration by aphid. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24: 521-530
  29. Tjallingii, W. F. 1985. Electrical nature of recorded signals during stylet penetration by aphid. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 38: 177-186 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00361930
  30. Tjallingii, W.F. 1988. Electrical recording of stylet penetration activities. aphids, their biology, natural enemies and control, Vol. B (ed. by A.K. Minks and Harrewijn), pp. 98-108. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam
  31. Tjallingii, W.F. and A. Mayoral. 1992. Criteria for host acceptance by aphids. In: S. B. J. Menken, J. H. visser, P. Harrewijn (eds.), Processing 8th Int. Symp. Insect-Plant Relationship, Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp. 280-282
  32. Visser, J.H. 1986. Host odor perception in phytophagous insect. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 31: 121-144 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.31.010186.001005
  33. Ward, S.A. 1991. Reproduction and host selection by aphids: the importance of 'rendezvous' hosts, pp. 202-226. In Reproductive behaviour in insects. eds. W. J. Bailey and J. Ridsdill-Smith, Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom
  34. Xiao, C., P. C. Gregg, W. Hu, Z. Yang and Z. Zhang. 2002. Attraction of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), to volatiles from wilted leaves of a non-hostplant, Pterocarya stenoptera. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 37: 1-6 https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2002.1
  35. Xiao, G. 1991. Forest insect of China, forest research institute. 1361pp. Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing
  36. Yang, J.O., E.H. Kim, C.M. Yoon, K.S. Ahn and K.H. Kim. 2009. Comparison of feeding behavior of B and Q biotypes of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera : Aleyrodidae) against red pepper and tomato varieties. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 48: 179-188 https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2009.48.2.179
  37. Youn, Y.N. and Y.D. Chang. 1993. Electrical feeding patterns and stylet movement of rice brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera), in rice tissue. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 32: 208-217

Cited by

  1. Pinus koraiensis twigs affect Monochamus saltuarius (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) longevity and reproduction vol.14, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2011.03.010
  2. Comparison of Cuticular Hydrocarbons of Different Developmental Stages of the Spot Clothing Wax Cicada, Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) vol.50, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2011.07.027
  3. Attraction effect against Lycorma delicatula, antioxidant activity and local irritation test of Ailanthus altissima extract vol.53, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14405/kjvr.2013.53.4.231
  4. Molecular comparison of Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) isolates in Korea, China, and Japan vol.16, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2013.07.003
  5. Repellency of lavender oil and linalool against spot clothing wax cicada, Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) and their electrophysiological responses vol.14, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2011.06.003
  6. Agonistic interactions between nymphs of Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) vol.14, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2010.11.010
  7. Model-based prediction of potential distribution of the invasive insect pest, spotted lanternfly Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae), by using CLIMEX 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2017.07.001
  8. Spectral preferences ofLycorma delicatula(Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) vol.43, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-5967.12012
  9. Structure and Sensilla of the Mouthparts of the Spotted Lanternfly Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae), a Polyphagous Invasive Planthopper vol.11, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156640
  10. An Old Remedy for a New Problem? Identification ofOoencyrtus kuvanae(Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), an Egg Parasitoid ofLycorma delicatula(Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) in North America vol.17, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iew114
  11. Preliminary Observation on the Mating Behavior and Daily Rhythm of the Ussur Brown Katydid, Paratlanticus ussuriensis Uvarov (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) vol.53, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2014.03.0.016
  12. The Effect of Winter Temperature on the Survival of Lantern Fly, Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) Eggs vol.53, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2014.07.0.034
  13. Development and characterization of 15 microsatellite loci fromLycorma delicatula(Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) vol.15, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2011.604936
  14. Effect of Electron-beam Irradiation on Development and Reproduction of Bemisia tabaci, Myzus persicae, Plutella xylostella and Tetranychus urticae vol.49, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2010.49.2.129
  15. A Comparative Study on the Spatial Diffusion Patterns of Ailanthus altissima Communities vol.25, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2012.25.5.550
  16. Lycorma delicatula(Hemiptera: Fulgoridae): A New Invasive Pest in the United States vol.6, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmv021
  17. Environmentally-friendly Control Methods and Forecasting the Hatching Time Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) in Jeonnam Province vol.51, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2012.09.0.022
  18. Molecular characterization of heat shock protein 70 cognate cDNA and its upregulation after diapause termination in Lycorma delicatula eggs vol.18, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2015.08.005
  19. Defense sequestration associated with narrowing of diet and ontogenetic change to aposematic colours in the spotted lanternfly vol.8, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34946-y
  20. Occurrence, Seasonal Abundance, and Superparasitism of Ooencyrtus kuvanae (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) as an Egg Parasitoid of the Spotted Lanternfly (Lycorma delicatula) in North America vol.10, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/f10020079