Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea (대한인간공학회지)

Ergonomics Society of Korea (대한인간공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development Process of Mobile Phone PUI Design Guidelines

휴대전화 PUI 디자인 가이드라인 도출 프로세스

  • Lee, Kyung-Sun (Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • You, Hee-Cheon (Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kwon, O-Chae (Samsung Electronics Co., LTD.) ;
  • Jung, Myung-Chul (Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Ajou University)
  • 이경선 (아주대학교 산업정보시스템공학부) ;
  • 유희천 (포항공과대학교 기계산업공학부) ;
  • 권오채 (삼성전자 무선사업부) ;
  • 정명철 (아주대학교 산업정보시스템공학부)
  • Published : 2009.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The present study was intended to suggest a process of physical user interface (PUI) design guideline development, which was validated with mobile phones. The process consisted of five stages including component and dimension analysis, function and environment analysis, evaluation criterion generation, literature review, and design guideline development. The process was applied to develop 19 mobile phone PUI design guidelines by identifying 28 components, 9 dimensions, 51 functions, 7 environmental conditions, and 15 criteria. The systematic approach of the process would be useful for manufacturers to develop design guidelines in an efficient manner.

Keywords

References

  1. 변재형, 문준기, 양승호, 김면석, 모바일 인터렉션을 위한 새로운 접근, 디자인학연구, 18(2), 165-172, 2005.
  2. 송미진, 심정훈, 허춘옥, 윤훈용, 소비자 감성을 고려한 소파 설계 DB 및 Interface 개발, 대한인간공학회지, 26(3), 81-89, 2007.
  3. 신승헌, 손병찬, 고령자에 적합한 가공식품 마개의 Torque에 관한 연구, 대한인간공학회지, 20(2), 83-97, 2001.
  4. 이경선, 유희천, 권오채, 정명철, PUI 디자인 가이드라인 도출을 위한 프로세스 개발, 대한인간공학회 추계학술대회, 2007.
  5. Amell, T. and Kumar, S., Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: Design as a prevention strategy, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 11(4), 255-265, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013344508217
  6. Brand, P. W. and Hollister, A. M., Clinical Mechanics of the Hand, 3rd ed., Mosby, 1999.
  7. Breinholt, G. and Krueger. H., Evaluation of key shapes on a touch screen simulation of a specialized keypad, Applied Ergonomics, 27(6), 375-379, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(96)00042-7
  8. Chipman, L. E., Bederson, B. B. and Golbeck, J. A., Slide bar: Analysis of a linear input device, Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(1), 1-9, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290310001638487
  9. Chuang, M. C., Chang, C. C. and Hsu, S. H., Perceptual factors underlying user preferences toward product form of mobile phones, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27, 247-258, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(00)00054-8
  10. Colle, H. A. and Hiszem, K. J., Standing at a kiosk: Effects of key size and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user preference, Ergonomics, 47(13), 1406-1423, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130410001724228
  11. Curran, K., Woods, D. and Riordan, B. O., Investigating text input methods for mobile phones, Telematics and Informatics, 23(1), 1-21, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2004.12.001
  12. Drury, C. G., A model for movement time on data-entry keyboards, Ergonomics, 35(2), 129-147, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139208967802
  13. Ellis, L. and Ficek, C., Color preferences according to gender and sexual orientation, Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1375-1379, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00231-2
  14. Goldstein, M., Chincholle, D. and Backstrom, B., Assessing two new wearable input paradigms: The finger-joint-gesture palm-keypad glove and the invisible phone clock, Personal Technologies, 4, 123-133, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01324119
  15. Grandjean, E., Fitting the Task to the Man, 4th ed., Taylor & Francis, 1988.
  16. Greiner, T. M., Hand Anthropometry of US Army Personnel, US Army Natick Research, 1991.
  17. Han, S. H., Kim, H. J., Yun, M. H., Hong, S. W. and Kim, J. S., Identifying mobile phone design features critical to user satisfaction, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 14(1), 15-29, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.10051
  18. Herbert A. C. and Keith, J. H., Standing at a kiosk: Effects of key size and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user preference, Ergonomics, 47(13), 1406-1423, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130410001724228
  19. Hoffmann, E. Q., Tsang, K. K. and Mu, A., Data-entry keyboard geometry and keying movement times, Ergonomics, 38(5), 940-950, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925161
  20. JD Power and Associates, Overall satisfaction with wireless mobile phone increases significantly as customers become more satisfied with ease of operation and feature options, Press release, McGraw-Hill, 2006.
  21. Ji, Y. G., Park, J. H., Lee, C. and Yun, M. H., A usability checklist for the usability evaluation of mobile phone user interface, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20(3), 207-231, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc2003_3
  22. Jin, B. S., Ko, S. M., Mun, J. S. and Ji, Y.G., A study for usability risk levelin physical user interface of mobile phone, LNCS, 4559, 327-335,2007.
  23. Jung, M. C., Haight, J. M. and Freivalds, A., Pushing and pulling carts and two-wheeled hand trucks, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, 79-89, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2004.08.006
  24. Karlson, A. K., Benjamin, B. and Contreras-Vidal, J., Studies in one-handed mobile design: Habit, desire and agility, HCIL, 1-10, 2006.
  25. Kriloff, H. Z., Human factor considerations for interactive display system, Conference on Human Factors in Computation Systems, (pp. 45-52), 1976.
  26. Ling, C., Hwang, W. and Salvendy, G., A survey of what customers want in a cell phone design, Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(2), 149-163, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500128214
  27. Martin, G. H., Configuring a numeric keypad for a touch screen, Ergonomics, 31(6), 945-953, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138808966733
  28. Miller, C. S. and Remington, R. W., Modeling information navigation: Implications for information architecture, Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 225-271, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1903_2
  29. Mizobuchi, S., Mori, K., Ren, X. and Michiaki, Y., An empirical study of minimum required size and the minimum number of targets for pen input on the small display, LNCS, 2411, 184-194, 2002.
  30. Nielsen, J. and Mack, R. J., Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
  31. Nielsen J. and Molich, R., Heuristic evaluation of user interface, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing system, (pp. 249-256), 1990.
  32. Oyama, H. and Shiramatsu, N., Smaller and bigger displays, Displays, 23(1), 31-39, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-9382(02)00007-0
  33. Salvendy, G., Handbook of Human Factor and Ergonomics, 3th ed., John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
  34. Sanders, M. and McCormick, E., Human Factor In Engineering And Design, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, 1993.
  35. Scott, B. and Conzola, M. S., Designing touch screen numeric keypads: Effects of finger size, key size, and key spacing, Proceedings of 41st Annual Meeting of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, (pp. 360-364), Albuquerque. New Mexico. 1997.
  36. Seva, R. R., Duh, H. B-L. and Helander., The marketing implications of affective product design, Applied Ergonomic, 38, 723-731, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.12.001
  37. Shin, D. M., Kim, J. Y., Hallbeck, M. S., Haight, J. M. and Jung, M. C., Ergonomic hand tool and chair development process, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 14(2), 247-252, 2007.
  38. Shneiderman, B. and Plaisant, C., Design the User Interface, 4th ed., Pearson Education, 2005.
  39. Smith-Jackson, T. L., Nussbaum, M. A. and Mooney, A. M., Accessible cell phone design: development and application of a need analysis framework, Disability and rehabilitation, 25(10), 549-560, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963828031000071732
  40. Sorensen, K., Multi-objective optimization of mobile phone keymaps for typing messages using a word list, European Journal of Operational Research, 179, 838-846, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.03.069
  41. Suri, J. F. and Marsh, M., "Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design", Applied Ergonomics, 31(2), 151-157, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00035-6
  42. Terwoqt, M. M. and Hoeksma, J. B., Colors and emotions: Preferences and combinations, Journal of General Psychology, 122(1), 5-17, 2001.
  43. Webb Associates., Anthropometric Source Book Volume II: A Handbook of Anthropometric Data, NASA, 1978.
  44. Wixon, D. and Ramey, J., Field methods casebook for software design, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. NY. 1996.
  45. Ziefle, M., The influence of user expertise and phone complexity on performance, ease of use and learnability of different mobile phones, Behaviour & Technology, 21(5), 303-311, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929021000048538
  46. Ziefle, M., Bay, S. and Schward, A., On key' meanings and modes: The impact of different key solutions on children's efficiency using a mobile phone, Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(5),413-431, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500197086

Cited by

  1. Effect of Product Appearance and Performance on the Consumer's Affection in the Design of Mobile Phones vol.29, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2010.29.4.527