대한인간공학회지 (Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea)

  • 제28권4호
  • /
  • Pages.1-7
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1229-1684(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-8462(eISSN)
대한인간공학회 (Ergonomics Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한글과 숫자 낱글자의 가독성에 미치는 주요 요인 평가

Evaluation of Main Factors Affecting on the Legibility of One-Syllable Korean Characters and Numbers

  • 이인석 (한경대학교 안전공학과) ;
  • 모승민 (아주대학교 산업정보시스템공학부) ;
  • 공용구 (성균관대학교 시스템경영공학과) ;
  • 송영웅 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과) ;
  • 정명철 (아주대학교 산업정보시스템공학부)
  • Lee, In-Seok (Department of Safety Engineering, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Mo, Seung-Min (Department of Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Kong, Yong-Ku (Department of Systems Management Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Song, Young-Woong (Department of Occupational Health, Catholic University of Daegu) ;
  • Jung, Myung-Chul (Department of Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Ajou University)
  • 발행 : 2009.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the legibility of one-syllable Korean characters with the participation of sixteen subjects. The experiment considered nine factors including age (young and old), gender (male and female), illuminance (150lx and 600lx), viewing distance (50cm and 200cm), material type (paper and LCD), typeface (Ming and Gothic), thickness (plain and bold), color contrast (black letter/white background and white letter/black background), and complexity (simple, complex, and number) to examine main effects with a $2^{6-3}\times3$ fractional factorial design. The dependent variables were minimum character size of 100% correctness, maximum character size of 0% correctness, and minimum character size of comfortable reading preference. The results of analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that age, illuminance, viewing distance and complexity were significant for all dependent variables, except gender which was significant only for the minimum character size of comfortable reading preference. In general, the young could see twofold smaller size letters than the elderly. The subjects could see smaller sized letters with the illuminance of 600lx and viewing distance of 50cm than 150lx and 200cm, respectively and also with numbers, simple characters, and complex characters in that order. The findings of this study could be characterized about the legibility of Korean characters and be good resources for developing its standard.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 국립국어연구원, 한국 현대 소설의 어휘 조사 연구, 국립국어연구원, 2003.
  2. 김상오, 산림휴양지역 내 설치된 자기안내식 해설판의 가독성 평가 및 개선 방안, 한국식물 . 인간 . 환경학회지, 10(3), 1-9, 2007.
  3. 박세진, 이준수, 강덕희, 이현자, 전자제품설계를 위한 가독성 평가, 대한인간공학회 춘계학술대회 논문집, 360-369, 2007.
  4. 이기영, 유태호, 이군상, 오영태, 도로표지내 글자간 적정 여백률에 관한 실험적 연구, 대한교통학회지, 24(6), 21-32, 2006.
  5. 이수진, 김진우, 휘도대비가 가독성에 미치는 영향에 대한 실험 연구, 대한인간공학회지, 26 (2), 21-33, 2007.
  6. 정성재, 이근희, 오형술, 배열과 색대비를 고려한 표제용 글자 인식에 관한 연구, 공업경영학회지, 18(36), 71-82, 1995.
  7. 지식경제부 기술표준원, 한국산업규격 조도기준(규격번호 KSA3011). 경기도, 대한민국, 2003.
  8. 통계청, 장례인구추계; Population Projections for Korea: 2005~2050, 2006.
  9. 황우상, 이동춘, 이상도, 이진호, VDT 화면에서 한글의 글자 크기와 서체에 따른 탐색속도와 오류율에 관한 실험적 연구, 대한인간공학회지, 16 (2), 29-38, 1997.
  10. Bernard, M., Liao, C. and Mills, M., The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 175-176, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634173
  11. Charness, N. and Dijkstra, K., Age, luminance and print legibility in homes, offices, and public places, Human Factors, 41(2), 173-193, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872099779591204
  12. Fisk, A., Rogers, W., Charness, N., Czaia, S. and Sharit, J., Designing for older adults, CRC Press, 423-433, 2004.
  13. Gittings, N. and Fozard, J., Age related changes in visual acuity, Experimental Gerontology, 21(4/5), 423-433, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0531-5565(86)90047-1
  14. Japanese Industrial Standard, Guidelines for the elderly and people with disabilities-visual signs and displays-estimation of minimum legible size for a Japanese single character, JIS S 0032:2003, 2003.
  15. Kuntz, J. and Sleight, R., Legibility of numbers: the optimal ratio of heightto width of stroke, The American Journal of Psychology, 63(4),567-575, 1950. https://doi.org/10.2307/1418871
  16. McLean, M., Brightness contrast, color contrast, and legibility, Human Factors, 7(6), 521-526, 1965. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872086500700603
  17. Sagawa, K. and Itoh, N., Legibile font size of a Japanese single character for older people, Proceedings of the 16th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, 2006.
  18. Sagawa, K. Ujike, H. and Sasaki, T., Legibility of Japanese character for older people, Proceedings of the 15th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, 2003.
  19. Sanders, M. and McCormick, E., Human Factors in Engineering and Design, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, 1993.
  20. Tomioka, K., Study on legibility of characters for the elderly-effects of character display modes on legibility, Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 26(2), 159-164, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa2.26.159
  21. Tullis, T., Boynton, J. and Hersh, H., Redability of fonts in the windows environment, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 127-128, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1145/223355.223463
  22. US Department of Health and Human Services, Guidance for Industry: Labeling OTC Human Drug Products Questions and Answers, Food and Drug Administration, 2005.
  23. Vanderplas, J. M. and Vanderplas, J. H., Some factors affecting legibility of printed materials for older adults, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 923-932, 1980. https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.50.3.923-932

피인용 문헌

  1. The Effect of Form Factors and Control Types on Unsorted List Search for Full Touch Phone vol.31, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2012.31.2.309
  2. What are Legible Korean Font Sizes within In-Vehicle Information Systems? vol.31, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2012.31.2.397
  3. The Effect of Blue-light Blocking Ophthalmic Lenses on Legibility and Fatigue during Near work with a Smartpad vol.22, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2017.22.1.81