DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Complexity Estimation Based Work Load Balancing for a Parallel Lidar Waveform Decomposition Algorithm

  • Jung, Jin-Ha (Laboratory for Applications of Remote Sensing, Purdue University) ;
  • Crawford, Melba M. (Laboratory for Applications of Remote Sensing, Purdue University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hoon (Department of Industrial Engineering, Kyungwon University)
  • Published : 2009.12.30

Abstract

LIDAR (LIght Detection And Ranging) is an active remote sensing technology which provides 3D coordinates of the Earth's surface by performing range measurements from the sensor. Early small footprint LIDAR systems recorded multiple discrete returns from the back-scattered energy. Recent advances in LIDAR hardware now make it possible to record full digital waveforms of the returned energy. LIDAR waveform decomposition involves separating the return waveform into a mixture of components which are then used to characterize the original data. The most common statistical mixture model used for this process is the Gaussian mixture. Waveform decomposition plays an important role in LIDAR waveform processing, since the resulting components are expected to represent reflection surfaces within waveform footprints. Hence the decomposition results ultimately affect the interpretation of LIDAR waveform data. Computational requirements in the waveform decomposition process result from two factors; (1) estimation of the number of components in a mixture and the resulting parameter estimates, which are inter-related and cannot be solved separately, and (2) parameter optimization does not have a closed form solution, and thus needs to be solved iteratively. The current state-of-the-art airborne LIDAR system acquires more than 50,000 waveforms per second, so decomposing the enormous number of waveforms is challenging using traditional single processor architecture. To tackle this issue, four parallel LIDAR waveform decomposition algorithms with different work load balancing schemes - (1) no weighting, (2) a decomposition results-based linear weighting, (3) a decomposition results-based squared weighting, and (4) a decomposition time-based linear weighting - were developed and tested with varying number of processors (8-256). The results were compared in terms of efficiency. Overall, the decomposition time-based linear weighting work load balancing approach yielded the best performance among four approaches.

Keywords

References

  1. Blair, J. B., Rabine, D. L, and Hofton, M. A., 1999, The Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor: a mediumaltitude, digitisation-only, airborne laser altimeter for mapping vegetation and topography. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54: 115-122 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00002-7
  2. Chauve, A., Mallet, C., Bretar, F., Durrieu, S., Deseilligny, M.P., and Peuch, W., 2007, Processing full-waveform LIDAR data: Modelling raw signals. ISPRS Workshop on Laser Scanning 2007 and SilviLaser 2007, pp. 102-107
  3. Duong, V. H., Lindenbergh, R., Pfeifer, N., and Vosselman, G., 2008, Single and two epoch analysis of ICESat full waveform data over forested areas. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(5): 1453-1473 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701736372
  4. Grama, A., Gupta, A., Karypis, G., and Kumar, V., 2003, Introduction to parallel computing. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., pp. 85-142
  5. Gutierrez, R., Neuenschwander, A., and Crawford, M. M., 2005, Development of Laser Waveform Digitization for Airborne LIDAR Topographic Mapping Instrumentation. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS 2005. IEEE International, pp. 1154-1157
  6. Hofton, M. A., Blair, J. B., and Minster, J., 2000, Decomposition of Laser Altimeter Waveforms. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38(4): 1989-1996 https://doi.org/10.1109/36.851780
  7. Jung, J. and Crawford, M. M., 2008, A Two-Stage Approach for Decomposition of ICESat Waveforms. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2008. IGARSS 2008. IEEE International, pp. 680-683
  8. Mallet, C. and Bretar, F., 2009. Full-waveform topographic lidar: State-of-the-art. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 64(1): 1-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.09.007
  9. Neuenschwaner, A. L., Urban, T. J., Gutierrez, R., and Schutz, B. E., 2008, Characterization of ICESat/GLAS waveforms over terrestrial ecosystems: Implications for vegetation mapping. 2008, American Geophysical Union, 113 https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000557
  10. Persson, A., Soderman, U., Topel, J., and Ahlberg, S., Visualization and analysis of full-waveform airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS Workshop on Laser scanning 2005, pp. 103-108
  11. Reitberger, J., Krzystek, Pl, and Stilla, U., 2008, Analysis of full waveform LIDAR data for the classification of decisuous and coniferous trees, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(5): 1407-1431 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701736448
  12. Zwally, H. J., 2002, ICESat's laser measurement of polar ice, atmosphere, ocean, and land. Journal of Geodynamics, 34: 405-445 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(02)00042-X