Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems (한국산업정보학회논문지)

Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems (한국산업정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the adoption-diffusion and use-diffusion of the digital convergence product : Focusing on the camera phone

디지털융합제품의 수용-확산 및 사용-확산에 관한 연구 : 카메라폰을 대상으로

  • 유상진 (계명대학교 경영정보학과) ;
  • 손정임 (계명대학교 경영정보학과)
  • Published : 2009.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed the diffusion process of digital convergence products focused on camera phon to compare the traditional adoption-diffusion model with use-diffusion model proposed by Shih and Venkatesh(2004). The results suggested that observability, perceived usefulness, innovativeness, relative advantage have effects on the intention of repurchase in the adoption-diffusion model. On the other hand, the intention of repurchase has been affected by technological sophistication, satisfaction, innovativeness, relative advantage in the use-diffusion model. These results imply that the traditional adoption-diffusion model could be applied to the cases of the digital convergence products. In addition, the results also show that the use-diffusion model is superior to the traditional model in analyzing the diffusion of digital convergence products.

본 연구에서는 디지털 융합 기술의 대표적인 제품이라 할 수 있는 카메라폰을 대상으로 전통적인 확산모델인 TAM을 비롯한 수용-확산모델과 최근 Shih and Venkatesh(2004)에 의해 제시된 사용-확산 모델의 비교를 통해 디지털융합제품의 확산과정을 규명하였다. 수용-확산 모델을 적용한 분석결과에서는 관찰가능성, 인지된 유용성, 혁신성, 상대적 이점 등이 재구매 의도에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 반면에 사용-확산 모델을 적용한 분석결과에서는 기술정교성과 만족, 혁신성과 상대적 이점 등이 재구매의도에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과는 신제품 확산과정에 대한 소비자 관점에서의 이론적 모형에 있어서 주류를 이루고 있는 TAM을 비롯한 수용-확산 모델이 카메라폰과 같은 디지털 융합기술의 확산에도 적용될 수 있음을 시사하고 있다. 또한 기존 제품의 사용을 통해 형성된 기술적 정교성과 만족을 중심으로 하는 사용-확산모델이 디지털 융합 제품 확산에 보다 설득력을 지니고 있음을 보여주고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김경규, 이정우, 김혜선, “인터넷 뱅킹 채택 행위에 있어서 신뢰와 위험의 영향”, 경영학 연구, 제32권 6호, pp.1771-1797, 2003.
  2. 김문태, 이종호, “컨버전스 제품의 사용확산 및 재수용에 영향을 미치는 N 세대 소비자의 혁신성 및 준거집단 순응성의 영향”, 산업경제연구, 제 20권 3호, pp.1253-1278, 2007.
  3. 박철, “인터넷 정보탐색 가치가 인터넷 쇼핑 행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 쇼핑몰 방문빈도와 구매의도를 중심으로 -”, 마케팅 연구, 제15권 1호, pp.143-162, 2000.
  4. 이진용, “마케팅이 경험적 접근방법 및 그 활용방안에 관한 비판적 고찰”, 한국마케팅 학회, 제5권 2호, pp.19-48, 2003.
  5. 장대련, 조성도, “기술제품 사용자의 조직 내 혁신저항에 영향을 미치는 요인과 지각된 자기능력의 조절효과에 관한 연구”, 소비자 연구, 제 13권 3호, 245-262, 2002.
  6. Ajzen, I., The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, pp. 179-211, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  7. Alba, J. W. and J. W. Hutchinson, "Dimensions of consumer Expertise," Journal of consumer Research, vol. 13 (March), pp.411-454, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1086/209080
  8. Alexandra M., "Social acceptance of renewable energy innovations: The role of technology cooperation in urban Mexico, Development studies Institute(DESTIN)," London School of Economics and Political Science(LSE), London, UK, Available online 22 January, pp. 2790-2798, 2007
  9. Broniaczyk, Susan M. and Andrew D., "Gershoff, Meaningless differentiation Revisited," Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 24, pp.223-228, 1997.
  10. Cai, X., A test of the functional equivalence principle in the new media environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Indiana, 2001.
  11. Carpenter, G. S., R. Glazer, and K. Nakamoto, "Meaningful Brands from Meaningless Differentiation: The Dependence on Irrelevant Attributes," Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 31(August), pp.339-350, 1994. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152221
  12. Cronin, J. J. Jr. and S. A. Taylor, "Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension," Journal of Marketing, vol. 56(July), pp.55-68, 1992.
  13. Davis, F. D., "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 13(3), pp.319-340, 1989. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  14. Ellen, P. S., W. O. Bearden, and S. Sharma, "Resistance to Technological Innovation: An Examination of the role of Self-Efficacy and Performance Satisfaction," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Satisfaction, vol. 19(4), pp.297-307, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726504
  15. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addisio-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
  16. Hellier, P. K, Carr, G. M., and Richard, J. A., "Customer repurchase intention: A general structual equation model," European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 37, pp.1762-1800, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310495456
  17. Hoch, S. J. and Y. W. Ha., "Consumer Learning : Advertising and the Abiguity of Product Experience," Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 13, pp.221-233, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1086/209062
  18. Holbrook, M. B., R. W. Chestnut, Oliva., Terence A. Greeneaf and Eric A. Greenleaf, "Play as a Consumption Experience: The Roles of Emotions, Performance, and Personality in the Enjoyment of Games," Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 11 (September), pp.132-140, 1984.
  19. Hahn, M. H., S. H. Park, L. Krishnamurthi, and A. A. Zoltners "Analysis of New Product diffusion Using a Four-Segment Trial- Repeat Model," Marketing Science, vol. 13(3), pp. 224-247, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.13.3.224
  20. Kang, M., "Digital cable: exploring factors associated with early adoption.", Journal of Media Economics, vol. 15(3), pp.193-207, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327736ME1503_4
  21. Lee, E. J, J. k. Lee, and David W. Schumann, "The Influence of Communication Source and Mode on Consumer Adoption of Technological Innovation," Journal of consumer Affairs, vol. 36(1), pp. 1-27, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2002.tb00418.x
  22. Lee, E. J, J. k. Lee and David Eastwood, "A Two-Step Estimation of Consumer Adoption of Technology-Based Service Innovations," The Journal of consumer Affairs, vol. 37(2), pp. 256-278, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2003.tb00453.x
  23. Limayem, M., Khalifa, M., and Frini, A., "What makes consumers buy from Internet? A Longitudinal Study of Online Shopping.,", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 30(4), 421-432, 2000.
  24. Lindolf, T. R., "Computing Tales: Parents' Discourse About Technology and Family," Social Science Computer Review, vol. 10(3), pp.291-309, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443939201000301
  25. Malhotra, Y, Dennis, F., and Galletta, "Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Account for Social Influence: Theoretical Bases and Empirical Validation.," Proceeding of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. pp.6-14, 1999.
  26. Mick, D. and S. Fournier, "New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Direction for Research," Journal of Marketing, vol. 54(January), pp.1-26, 1998.
  27. Moore, G. C, and I. Benbasat, "Development of an Instrument to Measure the perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Behavior," Information Systems Research, vol. 3(2), pp.192-222, 1991.
  28. Mukherjee, A. and W. D. Hoyer, "The Effect of Novel Attribute on Product Evaluation," Journal of consumer research, vol. 28(December), pp.462-472, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1086/323733
  29. Oliva, T. A, R. L. Oliver, and Ian C. MacMillan, "Catastrophe Model for Developing Service Satisfaction Strategies," Journal of Marketing, vol. 56, pp. 83-95, 1992.
  30. Olshavsky, R. W. and R. A. Spreng (1996), "An Exploratory Study of the Innovation Evaluation Process," Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 13(6), pp.512-529, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(96)00037-9
  31. Page, M. C, d. R. Lehman, and A. B. Markman, "Entrenched Knowledge Structures and Consumer Response to New Product," Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 38(1), pp.14-29, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.1.14.18836
  32. Price, L. L. and N. M Ridgeway, "Development of a Scale to Measure Use Innovativeness," in Advances in consumer Research, Vol. 10, Richard P. Bagozzi and Alice Tybout, eds. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for consumer Research, pp.679-684, 1983.
  33. Ram, S. and H. S. Jung, "The Conceptualization and Measurement of Product Usage," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 18(1), pp.67-76, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729763
  34. Robinson, W. T., "Product Innovation and Start-UP Business Marketshare Performance," Management Science, vol. 36(10), pp.1279-1289, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.10.1279
  35. Rogers, E. M. (1983), Diffusion of Innovation(third Edition), New York: Free Press, 1983.
  36. Rogers, E. M. (1983), Diffusion of Innovation(Forth Edition), New York: Free Press, 1995.
  37. Rogers, E. M. (1983), Diffusion of Innovation(Fifth Edition), New York: Free Press, 2003.
  38. Rogers, E. M. (1983) and F. F. Shoemaker., The Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York, NY, 1983.
  39. Shih, C. F. and A. Venkatesh., "Beyond Adoption: Development and Application of a Use- Diffusion Model," Journal of Marketing, 68(January), vol. pp.59-72, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.59.24029
  40. Taylor, S. and Todd, P., "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, vol. 6(2), pp.144-176, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
  41. Tinnell, C. S., "An Ethnographic Look at Personal Computers in the Family Setting," Marriage & Family review, vol. 8(1-2), pp.59-69, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v08n01_05
  42. Venkatash, A., "A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges," MIS Quarterly, vol. 25(1), pp.71-102, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250959
  43. Venkatesh, V., "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Ease of Use : Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information System Research, vol. 11(4), pp.342-365,2000. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
  44. Venkatesh, A., E. Kruse, and C. F. Shih, "The Net-worked Home: An Analysis of Current Developments and Future Trends," Cognition, Technology, and Work, vol. 5(April), pp.23-32, 2003.
  45. Vitalari, N. P., A. Venkatesh, and K. Gronhaug., "Computing in the Home: Shifts in the time Allocation Patterns of the Households," Communications of the ACM, vol. 28(5), 512-522, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532.3537