Evaluation of Demerit-CUSUM Control Chart Performance Using Fast Initial Response

FIR을 이용한 Demerit-CUSUM 관리도의 수행도 평가

  • Kang, Hae-Woon (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kang, Chang-Wook (Dept. of Information and Industrial Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Baik, Jae-Won (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Nam, Sung-Ho (Dept. of Manufacturing Convergence R&D, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology)
  • 강해운 (한양대학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 강창욱 (한양대학교 정보경영공학과) ;
  • 백재원 (한양대학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 남성호 (한국생산기술연구원 융합생산기술연구부)
  • Published : 2009.03.31

Abstract

Complex Products may present more than one type of defects and these defects are not always of equal severity. These defects are classified according to their seriousness and effect on product quality and performance. Demerit systems are very effective systems to monitoring the different types of defects. So, classical demerit control chart used to monitor counts of several different types of defects simultaneously in complex products. S.M. Na et al.(2003) proposed the Demerit-CUSUM for the improvement of the demerit control chart performance and Nembhard, D. A. et al.(2001) and G.Y Cho et al.(2004) developed a Demerit control chart using the EWMA technique and evaluated the performance of the control chart. In this paper, we present an effective method for process control using the Demerit-CUSUM with fast initial response. Moreover, we evaluate exact performance of the Demerit-CUSUM control chart with fast initial response, Demerit-CUSUM and Demerit-EWMA according to changing sample size or parameters.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang, F. M., Chen, L. H., Chen, Y. L., and Huang, C. Y.; "Approximate distribution of demerit statistic-A bounding approach," Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52(7) : 3300-3309, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2007.10.029
  2. Chang, J. T., and Fricker, R. D.; "Detecting when a monotonically increasing mean has crossed a threshold," Journal of Quality Technology, 31(2) : 217-234, 1999
  3. Chimka, J. R., and Arispe, P. V.; "New Demerit Control Limits for Poisson Distributed Defects," Quality Engineering, 18(4) : 461-467, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1080/08982110600817235
  4. Chimka, J. R., and Vanessa Cabrera Arispe, P.; "Type II Errors of Demerit Control Charts," Quality Engineering, 19(3) : 207-214, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1080/08982110701477053
  5. Cho, G. Y., and Jeon, Y. M.; "A Study of Demerit-EWMA Control Charts," Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 15(2) : 431-439, 2004
  6. Dodge, H. F., and Torrey, M. N.; "A Check Inspection and Demerit Rating Plan," Journal of Quality Technology, 9(3) : 146-156, 1997
  7. Hawkins, D. M.; "Cumulative Sum Control Charting : An Underutilized SPC Tool," Quality Engineering, 5(3) : 463-477, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1080/08982119308918986
  8. Jones, L. A., Woodall, W. H., and Conerly, M. D.; "Exact Properties of Demerit Control Charts," Journal of Quality Technology, 31(2) : 207-216, 1999
  9. Lu, C. W., and Reynolds, M. R.; "EWMA control charts for monitoring the mean of autocorrelated processes," Journal of Quality Technology, 31(2) : 166-188, 1999
  10. Lucas, J. M., and Crosier, R. B.; "Fast Initial Response for CUSUM Quality-Control Schemes," Technometrics, 24(3) : 199-205, 1982 https://doi.org/10.2307/1268679
  11. Montgomery, D. C.; Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 5th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York: 300-416, 2005
  12. Na, S. M., Kang, C. W., and Sim, S. B.; "A Study of Demerit-CUSUM Control Chart and Interpretation Method," Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Managements, 31(1) : 132-141, 2003
  13. Nembhard, D. A., and Nembhard, H. B.; "A Demerit Control Chart for Autocorrelated Data," Quality Engineering, 13(2) : 179-190, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1080/08982110108918640
  14. Vargas, V. C., Lopes, L. F., and Souza, A. M.; "Comparative study of the perfermance of the CuSum and EWMA control charts," Computers & Industrial Engineering, 46(4) : 707-724, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2004.05.025