Protein Expression of Mouse Uterus in Post-Implantation

  • Kim, Hong-Rye (Division of Animal Science & Resources, Research Center for Transgenic Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Han, Rong-Xun (Division of Animal Science & Resources, Research Center for Transgenic Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Youn (Division of Animal Science & Resources, Research Center for Transgenic Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Diao, Yunfei (Division of Animal Science & Resources, Research Center for Transgenic Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Park, Chang-Sik (Division of Animal Science & Resources, Research Center for Transgenic Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jin, Dong-Il (Division of Animal Science & Resources, Research Center for Transgenic Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University)
  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

Pregnancy is a unique event in which a fetus develops in the uterus despite being genetically and immunologically different from the mother, and the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. To analyze the differential gene expression profiles in nonpregnant and 7 days post coitus (dpc) pregnant uterus of mice, we performed a global proteomic study by 2-D gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and MALDI-TOF-MS. The uterine proteins were separated using 2-DE, Approximately 1,000 spots were detected on staining with Coomassie brilliant blue. An image analysis using Melanie III (Swiss Institute for Bioinformatics) was performed to detect variations in protein spots between pregnant and nonpregnant uterus. Twenty-one spots were identified as differentially expressed proteins, of which 10 were up-regulated proteins such as alpha-fetoprotein, chloride intracellular channel 1, transgelin, heat-shock protein beta-1, and carbonic anhydrase II, while 11 were down-regulated proteins such as X-box binding protein, glutathione S-transferase omega 1, olfactory receptor Olfr204, and metalloproteinase-disintegrin domain containing protein TECADAM. Most of the identified proteins appeared to be related with catabolism, cell growth, metabolism, regulation, cell protection, protein repair, or protection. Our results uncovered key proteins of mouse uterus involved in pregnancy.

Keywords

References

  1. Burnum KE, Tranguch S, Mi D, Daikoku T, Dey SK, Caprioli RM (2008): Imaging mass spectrometry reveals unique protein profiles during embryo implantation. Endocrinology 149(7):3274-8 https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2008-0309
  2. Dey SK, Lim H, Das SK, Reese J, Paria BC, Daikoku T, Wang H (2004): Molecular cues to implantation. Endocr Rev 25:341-373 https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2003-0020
  3. Gorg A, Obermaier C, Boguth G, Harder A, Scheibe B, Wildgruber R, Weiss W (2000): The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 21:1037-1053 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000401)21:6<1037::AID-ELPS1037>3.0.CO;2-V
  4. Imam-Sghiouar N, Laude-Lemaire I, Labas V, Pflieger D, Le Caër JP, Caron M, Nabias DK, Joubert-Caron R (2002): Subproteomics analysis of phosphorylated proteins: Application to the study of B-lymphoblasts from a patient with Scott syndrome. Proteomics 2: 828-838 https://doi.org/10.1002/1615-9861(200207)2:7<828::AID-PROT828>3.0.CO;2-T
  5. Jensen ON, Wilm M, Shevchenko A, Mann M (1999): Sample preparation methods for mass spectrometric peptide mapping directly from 2-DE gels. Methods Mol Biol 112:513-530
  6. Kennedy TG, Gillio-Meina C, Phang SH (2007): Prostaglandins and the initiation of blastocyst implantation and decidualization. Reproduction 134(5):635- 643 https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-07-0328
  7. Kim HR, Kang JK, Yoon JT, Seong HH, Jung JK, Lee HM, Park CS, Jin DI (2005): Protein profiles of bovine placenta derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer. Proteomics 5(16):4264-73 https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200401297
  8. Matalon ST, Drucker L, Fishman A, Ornoy A, Lishner M (2008): The role of heat shock protein 27 in extravillous trophoblast differentiation. J Cell Biochem 103(3):719-29 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.21476
  9. Mellor AL, Munn DH (2000): Immunology at the maternal-fetal interface: lessons for T cell tolerance and suppression. Annu Rev Immunol 18:367-91 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.367
  10. Paria BC, Huet-Hudson YM, Dey SK (1993): Blastocyst's state of activity determines the “window” of implantation in the receptive mouse uterus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:10159-10162 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.21.10159
  11. Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M (1996): Electrospray mass spectrometric study of melittin trypsinolysis by a kinetic approach. Anal Chem 68:850- 858 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00113a021
  12. Thellin O, Coumans B, Zorzi W, Igout A, Heinen E (2000): Tolerance to the foeto-placental 'graft': ten ways to support a child for nine months. Curr Opin Immunol 12(6):731-737 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-7915(00)00170-9
  13. Wang H, Dey SK (2006): Roadmap to embryo implantation: clues from mouse models. Nat Rev 7: 185-199 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1808
  14. Xu L, Bergan RC (2006): Genistein inhibits matrix metalloproteinasetype 2 activation and prostate cancer cell invasion by blocking the transforming growth factor beta-mediated activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2-27- kDa heat shock protein pathway. Mol Pharmacol 70:869-877 https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.106.023861