A Study on the Cause of the Accidents Influencing Factor based on the Safety Management Shape Types of the Cooperation Companies in Semiconductor Industry

협력업체의 안전관리 형태에 따른 반도체 산업의 사고의 영향요인에 관한 연구

  • Yoon, Yong-Gu (Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Park, Peom (Department Of Industrial System Engineering, Ajou University)
  • 윤용구 (삼성전자) ;
  • 박범 (아주대학교 산업시스템공학과)
  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

The studies on semiconductor industrial accident in korea have been focused on the frequencies of each type of safety management employee, characteristics, cause and unsafe conditions, acts and so on. Those attributes of semiconductor industrial accidents were usually analyzed independently, so that it was hard to provides a wel-developed process and systematic guidelines for efficient safety management. Therefore, there were a few studies based on comprehensive survey in terms of the shape type of safe management. The questionnaire survey carried out for the 284 workers who were responsible for safety management in center with cooperation companies in semiconductor industry factor analysis showed that there were three factors of safety management. First, investment and operation and management for accident prevention, Second, unsafe act and condition, safety management Third, general human error and behavior. The industries of respondents were correlative with three groups. Three groups showed statistically significant differences on the number of cases. Actually, the group with the larger investment and the more unsafe cause, human error of accidents prevention had a smaller causes of accident cases.

Keywords

References

  1. 윤용구; “반도체 산업재해분석 및 예방 Model 개발”, 아주 대학교 석사학위논문, 1-3, 2002
  2. 이동호, 박동현, 배성규, 허국강; “안전관리의 유형별 특성에 관한 연구”, 한국안전학회지, 11, 2000
  3. 유유연, 정서일, 강경식, 이동훈, 이경식, 조영도; “DEA기법을 활용한 안전관리자의 운영 효율성 평가”, 대한안전경영과학회지, 9(5) : 17, 2007
  4. 조중재, 한정혜, 박병선; SAS통계자료분석, 교우사, 75-80, 1997
  5. A. M. Feyer, A. M. Williamson, and D. R Cains; “The involvement of human behaviour in occupational accident : errors in context,” Safety Science, 25(1-3) : 55-65, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00008-8
  6. P. C., Cacciabue; “Modeling and Simulation of Human Behaviour for Safety Analysis and Control of Complex System,” Safety Science, 28(2) : 97-110, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00079-9
  7. Sonia M., Pedroso Goncalves, Silvia Agostinho da Silva, and Maria Luisa Lima; “The impact of work accident experience on causal attribution and worker behaviour,” Safety Science 46 : 994-1001, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.11.002
  8. S., Larson and A., Pousette, M., Torner; “Psychological Climate and Safety in the Construction Industry-mediated in Influence on Safety Behaviour Safety Science,” 46 : 405-412, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.05.012
  9. Tsung-Chih Wu, Chi-Hsiang Chen, Chin-Chung Li; “A correlation among safety leadership, safety climate and safety performance,” Journal of Loss Prevention, 307, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2007.11.001