한국유기농업학회지 (Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture)

  • 제17권4호
  • /
  • Pages.413-439
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1229-3571(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-819X(eISSN)
한국유기농업학회 (Korean Association of Organic Agriculture)
권호 표지

Bivariate Ordered Probit 모형을 이용한 미국 농업의 다원적 기능에 대한 소비자 인식분석

Assessing Public Attitude for Multifunctional Roles of the U.S. Agriculture Using a Bivariate Ordered Probit Model

  • 발행 : 2009.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study conducts a survey and test to understand U.S. public's perception about multifunctionality. The questionnaire suggests seven alternative way of providing questions about intangible benefits provided by agriculture in the U.S. The final questionnaire was administered as an e-mail survey in June 2008 to a nationally representative household panel maintained in the U.S. by the Ipsos Observer. Data analysis shows that 64 percent of respondents considered the multifunctionality of agriculiture as an important issue and 45 percent of respondents were in favor of increasing government expenditure to support farmland preservation. Using Fishbein's multi-attribute model as a theoretical background, this paper develops an empirical model to assess and attributes of multifunctionality. For the analysis, bivariate orderd probit model was set up to reflect respondent's attitude. Regression analyses show that two questions (how much you agree with agriculture's intangible benefit and increasing government expenditure to support agriculture) are shaped by different sets of facts.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 서성한, 김준석. 금웅연. 2005. 소비자 행동론. 박영사.
  2. 농림수산식품부. 2008. 알기쉬운 DDA협상용어자료집.
  3. 오세익, 김동원, 박혜진. 2004. 농업의 다원적 기능에 대한 국민의식조사. 한국농촌경제연구원.
  4. 권오상, 김기철, 노재선. 2004. 설문조사기법을 이용한 다원적 농업의 범위의 경제성 검정. 농업경제연구 45(2): 85-101.
  5. 김수석, 오세익. 2003. 연구노트: 농업의 다원적 기능에 대한 가치 평가. 농촌경제 26(2):1-13.
  6. 김은자, 이한기. 2001. 농업 농촌의 공익기능 인식 평가. 한국농촌사회학회. 농촌사회 11(2): 135-158.
  7. 성진근. 2000. 농업의 다기능에 관한 소고. 99동계심포지움자료집. 한국농업경제학회.
  8. 안윤수,김은자,김영,서정호,강경하 ,김태균. 2003. 농촌의 공익적 기능 평가 연구: 농촌의 정서함양기능, 전통문화 보전기능, 지역사회 유지기능, 녹지공간 제공기능 가치평가 연구. 농업과학기술원.
  9. 안윤수, 김은자, 김영, 서정호. 2005. 농촌의 사회문화적 공익기능 가치평가. 한국농촌사회학회. 농촌사회 15(1): 175-213.
  10. 이광석. 농촌방문의 경제적 편익. 농업경제연구 37: 147-159.
  11. 이상영, 신용관, 김영. 2003. 농촌의 다원적 기능에 대한 지불의사 분석. 한국축산경영학회. 농업정책학회. 농업경영정책연구 30(3): 524-535.
  12. 이정환. 2006. 한 미 FTA 대응 미국 농업예산 및 농업법 연구와 시사점 도출. GS & J.
  13. 임정빈. 2003. 농업의 다원적 기능에 대한 국제적 논의 내용과 주요 쟁점. 농업생명과학연구 37(3): 83-90.
  14. Adams, J. D. 2006. Learning, Internal Research, and Spillovers. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 15(January): 5-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000332178
  15. Burrell, A. 2001. Multifunctionality and Agricultural Trade Liberalisation. 77th EAAE Seminar/ NJF Seminar 325. August 17-18. Helsinki.
  16. Cairns Group. 2000. Statement by the Carins Group to Special Session of the WTO Agriculture Committee.
  17. Calhoun, C. 1989. Estimating the Distribution of Desired Family Size and Excess Fertility. Journal of Human Resources 24(4): 709-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/146002
  18. Dunlap, R. E. and Van Liere, K. D. 1978. Environmental Concern: A Bibliography of Empirical Studies and Brief Appraisal of the Literature. Public Administration Series Bibliography No. P-44. Monticello. Illinois: Vance Bibliographies. August.
  19. Dunlap, R. E. and Johnson, B. D. 1992. The setting for the crack era: Macro forces. micro consequences (1960-92). J. Psychoactive Drugs 24(3): 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.1992.10471656
  20. Ferris, J. M. 1983. Demands for Public Spending: An Attitudinal Approach. Public Choice 40: 135-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118516
  21. Fishbein, M. 1967. Attitude and the Prediction of Behavior, Reading in Attitude Theory and Measurement. Ed. by M. Fishbein. New York: Wiley.
  22. Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. 5th Edition, Upper Saddle River. New Jersey： Prentice-Hall.
  23. Hellerstein, D. and C. Nickerson, J. Cooper, P. Feather, D. Gadsby, D. Mullarkey, A. Tegene, and C. Barnard. 2002. Farmland Protection: The Role of Public Preferences for Rural Amenities. Agr. Econ. Report. No. 815. USDA Economic Research Service. Washington. DC.
  24. Hewitt, D. 1985. Demand for National Public Goods: Estimates from Surveys. Economic Inquiry 23: 487-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1985.tb01780.x
  25. Josling, Tim. 2002. Competing Paradigms in the OECD and Their Impacts on the WTO Agricultural Talks. Agricultural Policy for the 21 Century. eds. Luther Tweeten and grinley R. Thompson:　245-264. Ames, Iowa State Press.
  26. Lawrence, C. N. and H. D. Palmer. 2002. Heuristics, Hillary Clinton, and Health Care Reform. Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
  27. Libby, L. 2002. Farmland is Not Just for Farming Any More: The Policy Trends. Agricultural Policy for the 21 Century. eds. Luther Tweenten and Stanley R. Thompson. Iowa State Press.
  28. OECD. 1998. Agriculture and the Environment: Issues and Policies. Directorate for Food. Agriculture and Fisheries. OECD. Paris.
  29. OECD. 1998. Monitoring and Outlook for Agricultural Policies. Markets and Trade. Paris.
  30. OECD. 2003. Policy Brief: Agricultural Policies in OECD countries: A Positive Reform Agenda. OECD.
  31. Paarlberg, P. L., M. Bredahl, and J. G. Lee, 2002. Multifunctionality and Agricultural Trade Negotiations.　Review of Agricultural Economics 24: 322-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9353.00022
  32. Pope, R. D. 1986. Agricultural Factions.　American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68: 1096-1101.　 https://doi.org/10.2307/1241857
  33. Moon, W. and Balasubramanian, S.　K. 2001. A Multi-attribute Model of Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Organism. Annual American Agricultural Economics Association Meeting. Chicago. Aug5-8.
  34. Moon, W. and W. J. Florkowski. and B. Bruckner and I. Schonhof. 2002. Willingness to Pay for Environmental Practices: Implications for Eco-Labeling. Land Economics 78(1).
  35. Moon, W. and Balasubramanian, S. K. 2003. Willingness to Pay for Non-biotech Foods in the U.S and U.K. Journal of Consumer Affairs 37: 317-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2003.tb00456.x
  36. Moon, W. and Kuethe, T. and Kraft, S. and Essks, J. D. 2009. Registered Voters‘s Preference for the Multifunctionality of Agriculture. Korea Journal of Agricultural Management Policy 36(1): 1-34.
  37. Scott, D. M. and K. W. Axhausen. 2006. Household mobility tool ownership: modeling interactions between cars and season tickets. Transportation from Springer 3 (4): 311-328.
  38. Yamamoto, T. and Shankar, V. N. 2004. Bivariate ordered-response probit model of driver’s and passenger’s injury severities in collisions with fixed objects. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(5): 869-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2003.09.002
  39. Varyam, J.　N.　and J.　L.　Jordan, and J.　E.　Epperson. 1990. Preference of Citizens for Agricultural Policies: Evidence from a National Survey. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 72: 258-267.
  40. Vera-Toscano, E. and Gomez-Limon, J.A. and Moyano, E. Y. and Garrido, F. 2007. Individuals’ Opinion on Agricultural Multifunctionality. Spanish Journal of Agriculture Research 5(3): 271-284. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2007053-248