Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Content and Methodology of Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice

근거중심 문헌정보실무의 내용과 방법론에 관한 연구

  • Published : 2009.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to apply the evidence-based library and information practice(EBLIP) in Korean librarianship with analysis of concepts and research method on EBLIP. EBLIP seeks to improve library practice by utilising the best available evidence in conjunction with a pragmatic perspective developed from working experiences in librarianship. The EBLIP focused on the medicine library, however, it is spread to academic, special, school library. EBLIP process can be described through its five stage: formulate a question, find evidence, critically appraise the evidence, apply results of appraisal, evaluate change, redefine problem. It provides a standardized methodology of systematic review, which is a best evidence in EBLIP and is a new mixed research method.

본 연구는 근거중심 문헌정보실무의 개념과 연구방법 및 동향을 분석하여 국내 적용가능성을 살펴보기 위한 기초연구로 수행되었다. 근거중심 문헌정보실무는 실무에서 문제해결과 업무수행 향상을 위해 신뢰성 있는 연구 결과의 활용을 촉진함으로써 연구와 실무 간에 근본적으로 존재하는 격차를 줄이기 위한 운동이다. 근거중심 문헌정보실무는 초기에 의학도서관을 중심으로 수행되었으나 점차로 대학, 전문, 학교도서관으로 확대되었으며 연구 주제 또한 이용자연구, 평가에 한정되었던 것이 경영, 장서, 서비스 등 도서관 서비스 전분야로 확대되고 있다. 근거중심 문헌정보실무의 수행은 특정한 문제해결을 위한 다양한 연구 결과의 검색, 선정, 평가, 활용의 과정이 이루어진다. 또한 가장 높은 수준의 연구결과인 비평적 리뷰의 생산과정을 정형화함으로써 기존 연구의 체계적인 평가를 수행함과 동시에 새로운 연구통합 방법을 제시하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립국어원 표준대사전.
  2. 김명수. 2007. '증거에 기초한 정책결정과 증거를 산출하는 평가에 관한 연구'. 감사원 평가연구원 전문가 연구 시리즈. 2007-001
  3. 박명화. 2006. '근거중심 간호의 이해와 적용'. 서울: 군자출판사
  4. 장혜란. 1993. 문헌정보학에 있어서의 실험적 연구방법. '한국문헌정보학회지', 25: 325-341
  5. Booth, Andrew. 2002. 'Mirage or reality?' Health Information and Libraries Journal 19: 56-68 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-1842.2002.00362.x
  6. Booth, Andrew. 2003. 'Bridging the researchpractice gap? the role of evidence based librarianship.' The New Review of Information and Library Research. 9(1): 3-23 https://doi.org/10.1080/13614550410001687909
  7. Booth, Andrew and Anne Brice. 2004. 'Appraising the evidence.' In Evidence-Based Practice for Information Professionals: a handbook. Edited by Andrew Booth and Anne Brice. London: Facet Publishing
  8. Brice, Anne and Alison Hill. 2004. 'A brief history of evidence-based practice'. In Evidence-Based Practice for Information Professionals: a handbook. Edited by Andrew Booth and Anne Brice. London: Facet Publishing
  9. Campbell Collaboration. 2004. Method Policy Briefs. [cited on 2008.12.20].
  10. Crumley, Ellen and Denise Koufogiannakis. 2002. 'Developing evidence-based librarianship: practical steps for implementation.' Health Information and Libraries Journal. 19: 61-70 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-1842.2002.00372.x
  11. Davies, Philip. 1999. 'What is evidence-based education?' British Journal of Educational Studies. 47(2): 108-121 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.00106
  12. Davies, Philip. 2004. 'Is evidence-based government possible?' The 4th Annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquium. Washington D.C. 19 Feb. 2004
  13. Eldredge, Johathan. 2000. 'Evidence-based librarianship: an overview.' Bulletin of Medicine Association. 88(4): 289-302
  14. Eldredge, Johathan. 2002. 'Evidence-based librarianship: what might we expect in the years ahead?' Health Information Libraries Journal, 19(2): 71-77 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-1842.2002.00369.x
  15. Eldredge, Johathan. 2006. 'Evidence-based librarianship: the EBL process.' Library Hi Tech. 24(3): 341-354 https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830610692118
  16. Fleischman, Steve. 2006. 'Moving to Evidence-Based Professional Practice.' Educational Leadership, March: 87-89
  17. Glynn, Lindsay. 2007. 'Editorial: Defending evidence-based practice'. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, [online], 2(2): 1-2. [cited 2008.7.21].
  18. Haddow, Gaby and Jane E. Klobas. 2004. 'Communication of research to practice in library and information science: Closing the gap.' Library and Information Science Research. 26(1): 29-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2003.11.010
  19. Jadad, Alejandro R., David Moher, Terry P. Klassen. 1998. 'Guides for Reading and Interpreting Systematic Reviews.' Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 152: 700-704
  20. Khan, Khalid S., Regina Kunz, Jos Kleijnen and Gerd Antes. 2003. Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine: how to review and apply findings of healthcare research. 2003. London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited
  21. Koufogiannakis, Denise and Ellen Crumley. 2004. 'Applying evidence to your everyday practice.' In Evidence-Based Practice for Information Professionals: a handbook. Edited by Andrew Booth and Anne Brice. London: Facet Publishing
  22. McKkibon, K. Ann. 1998. 'Evidence-based practice.' Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 86(3): 396-401
  23. Mullen, Edward J. and David L. Streiner. 2006. 'The evidence for and against evidence-based practice.' In Foundation of Evidence-Based Social Work Practice. Edited by Albert R. Roberts and Kenneth R. Yearger. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  24. Nye, Chad, Herb Turner, and Jamie Schwartz. 2006. Approaches to Parent Involvement for Improving the Academic Performance of Elementary School Age Children. [cited on 2009.1.25].
  25. Pickard, Alison Jane. 2007. Research Methods in Information. London: Facet Publishing
  26. Powell, Ronald R. and Lynn Silipigni Connaway. 2004. Basic Research Methods for Librarians. Westport: Libraries Unlimited
  27. Powell, Ronald R., Lynda M. Baker, and Joseph J. Mika. 2002. 'Library and information science practitioners and research.' Library & Information Science Research. 24: 49-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(01)00104-9
  28. Roberts, Albert R., Kenneth Yeager, and Cheryl Regehr. 2006. 'Bridging Evidence-Based Health Care and social work: how to search for, develop, and use evidence-based studies.' In Foundation of Evidence-Based Social Work Practice. Edited by Albert R. Roberts and Kenneth R. Yearger. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  29. The American Heritage Dictionary.
  30. The Campbell Collaboration.
  31. The Cochrane Collaboration.
  32. The Compact Oxford English Dictionary.

Cited by

  1. The Study on the Applying Methods for EBLIP in Korean Librarianship vol.44, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.3.219
  2. An Analysis on Interlibrary Loan Network of Public Libraries in Gyeonggi Province vol.30, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.2.083
  3. Research Trends of Archival Information Services in Korea vol.13, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2013.13.3.199