DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of the Impacts of the Impervious Surface Change in the Farm Region on Watershed Hydrology

농경지 불투수면 변화에 따른 유역 수문 영향 분석

  • 김학관 (서울대학교 농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 이은정 (서울대학교 대학원) ;
  • 박승우 (서울대학교 조경.지역시스템공학부.농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 강문성 (서울대학교 조경.지역시스템공학부.농업생명과학연구원)
  • Published : 2009.11.30

Abstract

The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was used in this study to evaluate the hydrologic impacts by the impervious surface change in the farm region. The model was calibrated and validated by using four years (1999-2002) of measured data for the Gyeongancheon watershed in Korea. The simulation results agreed well with observed values during the calibration and validation periods. Land use scenarios including various changes of the plastic film house area in the farm region were applied to assess their effects on watershed hydrology. The results indicated that the surface direct (5.6%~14.0%) and total runoff (0.8%~1.5%) increased, but the groundwater discharge (10.7%~27.7%) and evapotranspiration (1.5%~3.3%) decreased as the plastic film house area (5.7%~12.4%) increased.

Keywords

References

  1. Arnold, C. L., Jr., and C. J. Gibbons, 1996. Impervious surface coverage: Emergence of a key environmental factor. Journal of the American Planning Association 62(2): 243-258 https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975688
  2. Arnold, J. G., R. Srinivasan, R. S. Muttiah, and J. R. Williams, 1998. Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment Part Ⅰ: Model development. Journal of American Water Resources Association 34(1): 73-89 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
  3. Brabec, E., S. Schulte, and P. L. Richards, 2002. Impervious surface and water quality: A review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning. Journal of Planning Literature 16(4): 499-514 https://doi.org/10.1177/088541202400903563
  4. Chester, L., Jr. Arnold, and C. J. Gibbons, 1996. Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association 62(2): 243-258 https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975688
  5. Choi, S. M., and H. W. Lee, 2003. Analysis on the improvement level of minor rural roads - A cast study on the country areas of Chonnam province -. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 9(3): 25-34 (in Korean)
  6. David, R. L., and M. J. Gregory, 1999. Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research 35(1): 233-241 https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018
  7. Dow, C. L. and D. R. DeWalle, 2000. Trends in evaporation and Bowen ration on urbanizing watersheds in Eastern United States. Water Resources Research 36(7): 1835-1843 https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900062
  8. Green, W. H., and G. A. Ampt, 1911. Studies on soil physics, 1. The flow of air and water through soils. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4: 11-24
  9. Heo, C. H., 2003. Characteristics of runoff variation due to watershed urbanization. Korea Water Resources Association 36(5): 725-740 (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2003.36.5.725
  10. Jung, S. O., 2004. Groundwater management in the Kumamoto region, Jyushu, Japan. Magazine of Korea Water Resources Association 37(2): 74-81 (in Korean)
  11. Kim, J. K., K. H. Son, J. W. Noh, C. L. Jang, and I. H. Ko, 2006. Evaluation of urbanization effect and analysis of hydrological characteristics in the Gap River catchment using SWAT. Korea Water Resources Association 39(10): 881-890 (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.10.881
  12. Lazaro, T. R., 1979. Urban hydrology: A multidisciplinary perspective, Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  13. Lee, S. J., Y. Kim, S. H. Lee, and K. S. Lee, 2005. Water cycle simulation for the Dorimcheon catchment using WEP model. Korea Water Resources Association 38(6): 449-460 (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2005.38.6.449
  14. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MIFAFF), 2008. Food, agricultural, forestry and fisheries statistical yearbook. Gwacheon, Korea (in Korean)
  15. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF), 1996. Statistical yearbook of agriculture forestry and fisheries, Gwacheon, Korea (in Korean)
  16. Nash J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe, 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models par Ⅰ-A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10: 282-290 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
  17. National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2004. National engineering handbook, Part 630-Hydrology. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., USA
  18. Neitsch, S. G., J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, and J. R. Williams, 2005. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation. Version 2005, United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Temple, Texas, USA
  19. Park, M. J., H. J. Kwon, and S. J. Kim, 2005. Analysis of impacts of land cover change on runoff using HSPF model. Korea Water Resources Association 38(6): 495-504 (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2005.38.6.495
  20. Saxton, K. E., W. J. Rawls, J. S. Romberger, and R. I. Papendick, 1986. Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50(4): 1031-1036 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000040039x
  21. Schueler, R. R., 1994. The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques 1(3): 100-111
  22. Winchell B., R. Srinivasan, M. Di Luzio, and J. Arnold, 2008. ArcSWAT 2.0 interface for SWAT2005 user's guide, United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Temple, Texas, USA