한국전자거래학회지 (The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies)

  • 제14권4호
  • /
  • Pages.133-148
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 2288-3908(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-3846(eISSN)
한국전자거래학회 (Society for e-Business Studies)
권호 표지

온라인 티켓 재판매 시장에서의 Dynamic Pricing 협상모델

A Dynamic Pricing Negotiation Model in the Online Ticket Resale Market

  • 조재형 (부산외국어대학교 특성화교육원)
  • 발행 : 2009.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

다수의 구매자와 판매자가 존재하는 경매분야에서 효율적인 협상에 대한 새로운 에이전트 협상방법론을 제시하였다. 경매문제를 게임이론으로 재 정의하고 이를 에이전트 협상에 적용하여, 온라인 티켓 재판매 시장 문제에 적용하였다. 본 에이전트를 적용한 결과 모든 구매자가 만족할 수 있는 내쉬균형을 보이고, 구매자와 판매자의 조합이 파레토 최적임을 보여주고 있다. 특히 본 에이전트 협상을 적용할 수 있는 새로운 비즈니스 모델을 수립하고, 에이전트 협상 진행 시 필요한 도메인과 프로세스를 온톨로지로 구현하였다.

This study has tried to suggest a new model that can effectively redistribute the tickets in the online ticket resale market, while suggesting a new allocation mechanism based on an agent negotiation. To this end, this study has analyzed an auction in the online ticket resale market through Game theory. As a result of new agent mechanism, it has been proved that the price stability of ticket resale market leads to an increase. An agent negotiation helps to stabilize the ticket prices that are usually inclined to rise at auction, benefiting all the participants in the negotiations, consequently showing a Pareto solution. Especially, a framework for a negotiation process is suggested and domain and processes ontology are designed interrelatedly. With this modeling, a possibility of Ontology based agent negotiation is suggested.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김현수, 조재형, 최형림, 홍순구, "최적 공급사슬 구성을 위한 에이전트 협상방법론 개발", 한국지능정보시스템학회논문지, 제12권, 제2호, 2006, pp. 99-124.
  2. 사울스탈, 게임이론, 경문사, 2003.
  3. 신성휘, 게임이론 길라잡이, 박영사, 2005.
  4. Kisti, 글로벌동향브리핑, 2007.
  5. Anonymous, "The New Laws of Pricing," Internet world, Vol. 5, December 15, 1999, p. 27.
  6. Bartolini. C. and Jennings, N. R., "A Generic Software Framework for Automated Negotiation," HP Laboratories Bristol, HPL-200202, 2002.
  7. Bertsekas, P. D., "The Auction Algorithm： A Distributed Relaxation Method for the Assignment Problem," Annals of Operations Research 14, 1988, pp. 105-123 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02186476
  8. Cho, J. H., Kim, H. S., Choi, H. R., and Jung, J. U., "Agent System for Online Ticket Resale," KES-AMSTA 2008, LNAI 4953, 2008, pp. 614-623.
  9. Dawn G. Gregg, Steven Walczak, Auction Advisor：an agent-based online- auction decision support system, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 41, Issue 2, 2006, pp. 449-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2004.07.007
  10. Esther David, Rina Azoulay-Schwartz, Sarit Kraus, Bidding in sealed-bid and English multi-attribute auctions, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 42, Issue 2, 2006, pp. 527-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.02.007
  11. Kwon, O. B. and Lee, K. C., "MAC E：multi-agents coordination engine to resolve conflicts among functional units in an enterprise," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2002, pp. 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(02)00023-4
  12. Michael P. W. and Willian, E. W., "Auction Protocols for Decentralized Scheduling," Games and Economics Behavior 35, 2001, pp. 271-303. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.2000.0822
  13. Nagarajan, M. and Sosic, G., "Gametheoretic Analysis of Cooperation among Supply Chain Agents：Review and Extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, In Press, Corrected Proof, 2006.
  14. Petersen, S. A. Divitini, M. and Matsken, M., "An agent-basedapproach-to modeling virtual enterprises," Production Planningand Control, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2001, pp. 224-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/095372801300107707
  15. Russ, C. and Vierke, G., "The Matrix Auction：A Mechanism for the Market- Based Coordination of Enterprise Networks," German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Research Report RR-99-04, 1999.
  16. Sadeh, N. M. Hildum, D. W. Kjenstad, D., and Tseng, A., "MASCOT：an agent-based architecture for dynamic supply chain creation and coordination in the internet economy," Production Planning and Control, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2001, pp. 212-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/095372801300107680
  17. Sidney, C. B. and Truszkowski, W., "Ontology Negotiation between Scientific Archives," Thirteenth International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, 2001.
  18. Shubik, M., "The Dollar Auction Game： A Paradox in Noncooperative Behavior and Escalation," Journal of Conflict Resolution 15, 1971, pp. 109-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277101500111
  19. Yann, C., Paul, E. D., Ulle, E., Jerome, L., Michel, L., Nicolas, M., Julian, P., Steve, P., Juan, A. Rodriguez-aguilar, and Paulo, S., "Issues in multiagent resource allocation," Informatica 30, 2006, pp. 3-31.