Dose Related Effects of Poloxamer/Sodium Alginate Mixture in Prevention of Postoperative Adhesion Formation in Dogs

개에서 Poloxamer/Sodium Alginate 혼합물의 용량에 따른 복강 유착방지 효과

  • Jeong, Won-Seok (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Seong, Yun-Sang (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kwon, Young-Sam (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jang, Kwang-Ho (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

This study was performed to determine the minimum dose of Poloxamer/Sodium alginate (PX/SA) mixture on preventing intraperitoneal adhesions to evaluate organ toxicity. Twenty five healthy adult mongrel dogs (weighing 4.68${\pm}$1.67 kg) were divided into five experimental groups composed of five dogs respectively; negative control group (NC, non-treated), positive control group (PC, 2% carboxymethyl chitosan solution treated), and experiment 1 group (E1, 0.25 ml PX/SA mixture of abraded area), experiment 2 group (E2, 0.5 ml PX/SA mixture of abraded area), experiment 3 group (E3, 1.0 ml PX/SA mixture of abraded area). Venous blood specimens were collected from all experimental animals for hematologic and biochemical analysis: WBC, fibrinogen, AST, ALT, ALP, BUN and creatinine. The anti-adhesion effect was evaluated using a serosa abrasion model. The denuded ileum was coated with PX/SA mixture, carboxymethyl chitosan solution or neither. The tensile strength of the adhesion site was evaluated with a tensiometer. For histopathological examination, tissue samples of the liver and kidney were collected from all dogs. According to the results, the frequency and tensile strength values for adhesion separation in PX/SA group were significantly lower than those in negative control group (p < 0.05). In E2 group, the tensile strength was significantly decreased in consideration of PX/SA dose. The values of AST, ALT, ALP, BUN and creatinine of the control and the experimental groups showed no statistical differences. No obvious microscopic differences were noted among tissue sections obtained from all groups. The results suggest that PX/SA mixture may be effective on reducing peritoneal adhesion formation in dog and that 0.5 ml PX/SA mixture of abraded area is most effective dose. Moreover, PX/SA mixture was considered not to have toxicity for the liver and the kidney.

이 실험은 복강 유착 방지효과를 나타내는 Poloxamer/Sodium Alginate (PX/SA) 혼합물의 최소용량과 주요기 관의 독성 여부에 대해 알아보기 위해 실시하였다. 건강한 잡종성견 25마리를 음성대조군 (무처치), 양성대조군 (2% carboxymethyl chitosan 용액 처치), 실험군 1 (PX/SA 혼합물 0.25 ml 처치), 실험군 2 (PX/SA 혼합물 0.5 ml 처치), 실험군 3 (PX/SA 혼합물 1.0 ml 처치) 으로 나누고 각 군당 5마리씩 배치하였다. 혈액학 검사 (백혈구,섬유소원)와 혈액화학 검사(AST, ALT, ALP, BUN, Creatinine)를 위해 정맥에서 혈액을 채취하였다. 유착방지효과를 알아보기 위해 돌창자에 찰과상을 일으켜 carboxymethyl chitosan 용액, PX/SA 혼합물을 처치하는 장막 찰과 모델을 이용하였다. 유착부위의 유착강도는 장력측정기를 이용하여 측정하였다. 조직검사를 위해 각 군의 모든 개로부터 간과 신장 조직을 채취하였다. PX/SA혼합물을 처치한 실험군이 음성 대조군보다 유착발생 빈도와 유착강도 모두 낮게 측정되었다. 실험군 간의 비교에서 실험군 2에서 유착강도가 유의적으로 감소하였다. AST, ALT, ALP, BUN, Creatinine 은 대조군과 실험군 사이 유의적 차이가 발견되지 않았으며, 모든 군에서 얻어진 조직 표본에서도 군간 유의적 차이를 보이지 않았다. 본 실험의 결과, PX/SA 혼합물 0.5 ml는 복강 유착 형성을 효과적으로 감소시켰으며, 물질이며, 혈액 및 주요 장기에 대한 독성도 없는 것으로 사료된다

Keywords

References

  1. Buckman RF, Woods M, Sargent L, Gervin AS. A unifying pathogenetic mechanism in the etiology of intraperitoneal adhesions. J Surg Res 1976; 20: 1-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4804(76)90075-5
  2. DeCherney AH, Dizerega GS. Clinical problem of intraperitoneal postsurgical adhesion formation following general surgery and the use of adhesion prevention barriers. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77: 671-688 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70574-0
  3. Dizerega GS, Campeau JD. Peritoneal repair and post surgical adhesion formation. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 547-555 https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/7.6.547
  4. Dizerega GS. Contemporary adhesion prevention. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 219-235
  5. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, McGuire A, Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, O'Brien F, Buchan S, Crowe AM. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999; 353: 1476-1480 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09337-4
  6. Hellebrekers BW, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Trimbos JB, Emeis JJ, Kooistra T. Use of fibrinolytic agents in the prevention of postoperative adhesion formation. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 203-212 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00656-7
  7. Holmdahl L. The role of fibrinolysis in adhesion formation. Eur J Surg Suppl 1997; 577: 24-31
  8. Jang KH, Kwon YS, Kim JE, Kwon EJ, Oh TH, Lee KW, Jang IH. Effect of carboxymethyl chitosan on postoperative intraperitoneal adhesion formation in the rat. Korea J Vet Res 2000; 40: 635-643
  9. Kapur BM, Talwar JR, Gulati SM. Oxyphenbutazone antiinflammatory agent in prevention of peritoneal adhesions. Arch Surg 1969; 98: 301-302 https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1969.01340090077010
  10. Kayaoglu HA, Ozkan N, Hazinedaroglu SM, Ersoy OF, Koseoglu RD. An assessment of the effects of two types of bioresorbable barriers to prevent postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions in rats. Surg Today 2005; 35: 946-950 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-004-3050-8
  11. Kohda S, Nishikawa H, Sano M, Tsuchitani M, Miura K, Narama I, Nakano S. Six-month chronic intravenous toxicity study of cefodizime sodium in dogs. J Toxicol Sci 1988; 13 suppl 1: 123-175
  12. Kwon SW, Lim SH, Lee YW, Lee YG, Chu BY, Lee JH, Lee YM. Anti-adhesive Effect of Poloxamer/Alginate/CaCl2 Mixture in the Rat Model. J Korean Surg Soc 2006; 71: 280-287
  13. Lee HS, Lee IG, Ku SK. Single oral dose toxicity study of water extracts of Picrorrhiza Rhizoma in mice. J Toxicol Pub Health 2006; 22: 117-126
  14. Lee JH, Yang KJ, Shin HD, Park BR, Son CW, Jang HJ, Park DC, Lee HS, Ku SK. Single subcutaneous dose toxicity of Polycan${\circledR}$, a β-Glucan originated from Aureobasidium in mice. Lab Anim Res 2005; 21: 299-305
  15. Maclachlan NJ, Cullen JM. Liver, biliary system, and exocrine pancreas. In: Thomson's special veterinary pathology, 2nd ed, St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book. 1995: 81-151
  16. Ozel H, Avsar FM, Topaloglu S, Sahin M. Induction and assessment methods used in experimental adhesion studies. Wound Repair Regen 2005; 13: 358-364 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1067-1927.2005.130402.x
  17. Pijlman BM, D\ddot{o}rr PJ, Brommer EJ, Vemer HM. Prevention of adhesions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994; 53: 155-163 https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(94)90114-7
  18. Sch\ddot{a}fer M, Kr\ddot{a}henb\ddot{u}hl L, B\ddot{u}chler MW. Comparison of adhesion formation in open and laparoscopic surgery. Dig Surg 1998; 15: 148-152 https://doi.org/10.1159/000018609
  19. Steege JF, Stout AL. Resolution of chronic pelvic pain after laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 278-281 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(91)90079-7
  20. Sulaiman H, Dawson L, Laurent GJ, Bellingan GJ, Herrick SE. Role of plasminogen activators in peritoneal adhesion formation. Biochem Soc Trans 2002; 30: 126-131 https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0300126
  21. Thompson JN, Paterson-Brown S, Harbourne T, Whawell SA, Kalodiki E, Dudley HA. Reduced human peritoneal plasminogen activating activity: Possible mechanism of adhesion formation. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 382-4 https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800760422
  22. Tsuji S, Takahashi K, Yomo H, Fujiwara M, Kita N, Takebayashi K, Miyazaki K, Noda Y. Effectiveness of antiadhesion barriers in preventing adhesion after myomectomy in patients with uterine leiomyoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 123: 244-248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.04.012
  23. Yarema IV, Magomedov MA. Experimental study of the use of perftoran for preventing the formation of postoperative adhesions in peritonitis. Bull Exp Biol Med 2003; 136: 582-584 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BEBM.0000020210.57540.82