Anatomical Ultrastructure of Spermiogenesis and Spermatozoa of Pseudobagrus fulvidraco (Siluriformes: Bagridae) from Korea

한국산 동자개(Pseudobagrus fulvidraco)의 정세포변형과정과 성숙한 정자의 미세해부학적 구조(Siluriformes: Bagridae)

  • Kim, Kgu-Hwan (Department of Radiologic Technology, Daegu Health College) ;
  • Kwon, Deok-Mun (Department of Radiologic Technology, Daegu Health College)
  • 김구환 (대구보건대학 방사선과) ;
  • 권덕문 (대구보건대학 방사선과)
  • Received : 2009.05.14
  • Accepted : 2009.06.25
  • Published : 2009.06.30

Abstract

The spermiogenesis and mature spermatozoa of Pseudobagrus fulvidraco were described by means of scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Spermiogenesis is characterized by lateral development of the flagellum, nuclear rotation, deep nuclear fossa formation and compaction into thick granules. The spermatozoa exhibit a round head containing a nucleus that lacks an acrosome, and having a midpiece and a flagellum. The midpiece is small and has a short cytoplasm including several mitochondria separated from the tail by the cytoplasmic canal. The flagellum contains the 9+2 classical axoneme structure and has two axonemal fins. The presence of axonemal fins in the flagellum is a common character in Bagridae. The interrelationships among the Bagridae as well as other teleosts are herein discussed.

한국산 동자개 Pseudobagrus fulvidraco의 정세포변형과 성숙한 정자의 미세구조를 주사 및 투과전자현미경으로 관찰하였다. 정세포변형은 측면에서 발생되는 편모, 핵의 회전, 염색물질로 채워진 핵의 함입과 핵와의 형성이 특징적이었다. 성숙한 정자의 구조는 첨체가 없는 둥근두부와 짧은중편 그리고 긴 편모로 구성되어 있었다. 짧은 중편에는 다수의 미토콘드리아가 있으며 cytoplasmic canal에 의하여 편모와 분리되어 있었다. 편모는 전형적인 9+2 구조이며 axonemal fins를 가지고 있었다. Axonemal fins는 동자개과에서 공통적으로 나타나는 형질로 여겨지며 그 외 다른 특징을 경골어류에서 비교하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Afzelius, B.A. 1982. The flagellar apparatus of marine spermatozoa. Evolutionary and functional aspects. In: Amos, W.B and J.G. Duckett (eds.), Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic flagella. Cambridge univ. Press, London, pp. 495-519.
  2. Baccetti, B., A.G. Burrini, G. Callaini, G. Gibertini, M. Mazzini and S. Zerunian. 1984. Fish germinal cells I. Comparative spermatology of seven cyprinid species. Gamete Res., 10: 373-396. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1120100405
  3. Jamieson, B.G.M. 1991. Fish evolution and systematics: Evidence from spermatozoa. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135-148.
  4. Kim, K.H., A.S. Kwon and B.C. Lee. 2007. Ultrastructure of spermatozoa of the Light bullhead Leiocassis nitidus (Teleostei, Siluriformes, Bagridae). J. Fish. Sci. Technol., 10: 196-199. https://doi.org/10.5657/fas.2007.10.4.196
  5. Kim, K.H. and J.I. Lee. 2003. Ultrastructure of spermatozoa of the slender catfish, Pseudobagrus brevicorpus (Teleostei, Bagridae) with phylogenetic consideration. J. Kor. Fish. Soc., 36: 480-485. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2003.36.5.480
  6. Kim, J.K., K.H. Kim and K.J. Hwang. 2008. Anatomical ultrastructure of spermiogenesis and spermatozoa of Microphysogobio yaluensis (Pisces: Cyprinidae) from Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol., 20: 7-12. (in Korean)
  7. Kim, K.H. and Y.H. Lee. 2000. The ultrastructure of spermatozoa of the Ussurian bullhead, Leiocassis ussuriensis (Teleostei, Siluriformes, Bagridae) with phylogenetic consideration. Korean J. Limnol., 33: 405- 412. (in Korean)
  8. Kwon, A.S. and K.H. Kim. 2004. A comparision of ultrastructure of spermatozoa of two catfish, Silurus asotus and S. microdorsalis (Teleostei: Siluridae). Korean J. Ichthyol., 16: 128-134.
  9. Lee, Y.H. 1998. Ultrastructure of spermatozoa in the bagrid catfish, Pseudobagrus fulvidraco (Teleostei, Siluriformes, Bagridae). Korean J. Electron Microscopy, 28: 39-48.
  10. Lee, Y.H. and K.H. Kim. 1999. Ultrastructure of the south torrent catfish, Liobagrus mediadiposalis (Teleostei, Siluriformes, Amblycipitidae). Korean J. Limnol., 32: 271-280.
  11. Lee, Y.H. and K.H. Kim. 2001. The ultrastructure of spermatozoa of the slender catfish Silurus microdorsalis (Teleostei, Siluriformes, Siluridae) with phylogenetic considerations. J. Submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol., 33: 329- 336.
  12. Mattei, X. 1970. Spermiogenesis compare des poisson. In: Baccetti, B. (ed.), Comparative spermatology. New York, Academic Press, pp. 57-72.
  13. Mattei, X. 1991. Spermatozoon ultrastructure and its systematic implication in fish. Can. J. Zool., 69: 3038-3055. https://doi.org/10.1139/z91-428
  14. Quagio-Grassiotto, I., M.C. Gamerio, T. Schneider, L.R. Malabarba and C. Oliveira. 2003. Spermiogenesis and spermatozoa ultrastructure in five species of the Curimatidae with some considerations on speramtozoal ultrastructure in the Characiformes. Neotropical Ichthyology, 1: 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252003000100004
  15. Richardson, J. 1846. Report on the ichthyology on the seas of China and Japan. Rep. Rrit. Assoc. Adv. Sci., pp. 187-320.
  16. Santos, J.E., N. Bazzoli, E. Rizzo and G.B. Santos. 2001. Morphofuntional organization of the male reproductive system of the catfish Iheringichthys labrosus (Lütken, 1874) (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae). Tissue and Cell, 33: 533-540. https://doi.org/10.1054/tice.2001.0207
  17. Silveira, H., P. Rodrigues and C. Azevedo. 1990. Fine structure of the spermatogenesis of Blennius pholis (Pisces, Blenniidae). J. Submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol., 22: 103- 108.