DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Various Packaging Systems on the Quality Characteristic of Goat Meat

  • Morales-delaNuez, A. (Animal Production Unit, University of Las Palmas de G. C.) ;
  • Moreno-Indias, I. (Animal Production Unit, University of Las Palmas de G. C.) ;
  • Falcon, A. (Jucarne, S.A.) ;
  • Arguello, A. (Animal Production Unit, University of Las Palmas de G. C.) ;
  • Sanchez-Macias, D. (Animal Production Unit, University of Las Palmas de G. C.) ;
  • Capote, J. (Institute of Canary Agronomic Science Institute) ;
  • Castro, N. (Animal Production Unit, University of Las Palmas de G. C.)
  • Received : 2008.09.02
  • Accepted : 2009.01.02
  • Published : 2009.03.01

Abstract

40 goat kid ribcages were held for 7 days in storage conditions ($4^{\circ}C$) and used to determine the effects of three different packaging methods (atmospheric air, vacuum and modified atmosphere package (MAP) 10:70:20 mixture of $N_2:O_2:CO_2$) on meat quality of the chops. L* was affected by the packaging method being lighter than MAP chops. The coordinate a* significantly increased during storage time. For MAP-packed chops and those kept in atmospheric air, b* increased markedly during storage time whereas it remained unaffected throughout storage when in vacuum packages. Final pH values ranged from 5.6 to 5.8 and no effects were found for either storage time or packaging method. WHC means were lowest for the three packaging methods on day 7 of storage and highest on day 1. Storage time increased water loss in vacuum treatments. Trained panel colour acceptability was lower at 3, 5 and 7 days than on day 1 of storage for atmospheric air treatment and vacuum packaging, while for the MAP treatment average values on days 5 and 7 were lower than those observed on days 1 or 3. Trained panel odour was lower for atmospheric air and vacuum packages at 3, 5, and 7 days storage than at 1 day, while no differences were found in trained panel odour acceptability for MAP packages. With reference to consumers, the MAP proposed in the present study is the chosen method for storing goat meat, rather than vacuum or atmospheric air packaging.

Keywords

References

  1. Arg$\ddot{u}$ello, A., N. Castro, J. Capote and M. Solomon. 2005. Effects of diet and live weight at slaughter on kid meat quality. Meat Sci. 70:173-179 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.12.009
  2. Berruga, M. I., H. Vergara and L. Gallego. 2005. Influence of packaging conditions on microbial and lipid oxidation in lamb meat. Small Rumin. Res. 57:257-264 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.08.004
  3. Castro, N., J. Capote, S. Alvarez and A. Argüello. 2005. Effects of lyophilized colostrum and different colostrum feeding regimens on passive transfer of immunoglobulin G in Majorera goat kids. J. Dairy Sci. 88:3650-3654 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73050-2
  4. Chae, H. S., N. K. Singh, Y. M. Yoo, C. N. Ahn, S. G. Jeong, J. S. Ham and D. H. Kim. 2007. Meat quality and storage characteristics depending on PSE status of broiler breast meat. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:582-587
  5. Clark, D. S. and C. P. Lentz. 1973. Use of mixtures of carbon dioxide and oxygen for extending shelf-life of pre-packaged fresh beef. Journal Institut Canadien de Science et Technologie Alimentaire 6:194-196
  6. Colomer-Rocher, F., P. Morand-Fehr and A. H. Kirton. 1987. Standard methods and procedures for goat carcass evaluation, jointing and tissue separation. Livest. Prod. Sci. 17:149-159 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(87)90060-1
  7. Dhanda, J. S., D. G. Taylor, P. J. Murray, R. B. Pegg and P. J. Shand. 2003. Goat meat production: Present status and future possibilities. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:1842-1852
  8. Feldhusen, F., A. Warnatz, R. Erdmann and S. Wenzel. 1995. Influence of storage time on parameters of color stability of beef. Meat Sci. 40:235-243 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(94)00048-C
  9. Gatellier, P., C. Hamelin, Y. Durand and M. Renerre. 2001. Effect of a dietary vitamin E supplementation on colour stability and lipid oxidation of air- and modified atmosphere-packaged beef. Meat Sci. 59:133-140 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00063-8
  10. Gill, C. O. 1996. Extending the storage life of raw chilled meats. Meat Sci. 43:S99-S109
  11. Grau, R. and R. Hamm. 1953. Eine einfache Methode zur Bestimmung der Wasserbindung in Muskel. Naturwissenschaften 40:29-30 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00595734
  12. Insausti, K., M. J. Beriain, A. Purroy, P. Alberti, L. Lizaso and B. Hernandez. 1999. Colour stability of beef from different Spanish native cattle breeds stored under vacuum and modified atmosphere. Meat Sci. 53:241-249 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00063-7
  13. Insausti, K., M. J. Beriain, A. Purroy, P. Alberti, C. Gorraiz and M. J. Alzuela. 2001. Shelf life of beef from local Spanish cattle breeds stored under modified atmosphere. Meat Sci. 57:273-281 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00102-9
  14. ISO 4121. International Organization for Standardization Publications. 2003. Evaluation of food products by methods using scales. Sensory Analysis Methodology, Available from www.iso.org
  15. Kannan, G., B. Kouakou and S. Gelaye. 2001. Color changes reflecting myoglobin and lipid oxidation in chevron cuts during refrigerated display. Small Rumin. Res. 42:67-75 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(01)00232-2
  16. MacDougall, D. B. 1982. Changes in the colour and opacity of meat. Food Chem. 9:75-78 https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(82)90070-X
  17. Marichal, A., N. Castro, J. Capote, M. J. Zamorano and A. Arg$\ddot{u}$ello. 2003. Effects of live weight at slaughter (6, 10 and 25 kg) on kid carcass and meat quality. Livest. Prod. Sci. 83:247-256 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00113-1
  18. Naud$\acute{e}$, R. T. and H. S. Hofmeyr. 1981. Meat production (Ed. C. Gall), Goat production. Academic Press, pp. 285-307. London, UK
  19. Oman, J. S., D. F. Waldron, D. B. Griffin and J. W. Savell. 2000. Carcass traits and retail display-life of chops from different goat breed types. J. Anim. Sci. 78:1262-1266
  20. Rajkumar, V., M. K. Agnihotri and N. Sharma. 2004. Quality and shelf-life of vacuum and aerobic packed chevon patties under refrigeration. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:548-553
  21. SAS Institute. 2002. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 9.0 Edition. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC
  22. Smith, G. C., S. C. Seideman, J. W. Savell, C. W. Dill and C. Vanderzant. 1983. Vacuum packaging versus modified atmosphere packaging of lamb loins. J. Food Protect. 46:47-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(97)00047-1
  23. Vergara, H. and L. Gallego. 2001. Effects of gas composition in modified atmospheres on the storage quality of Spanish Manchega lamb. J. Sci. Food Agric. 81:1353-1357 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.953
  24. Wyszecki, G. and W. S. Stiles. 1982. Color science: concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae. Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York, USA
  25. Young, L. L., R. D. Reviere and B. Cole. 1988. Fresh red meats: a place to apply modified atmospheres. Food Tech. 42:65-69

Cited by

  1. The effects of modified atmosphere packaging on goat kid meat quality vol.39, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2011.621533
  2. Effect of Packaging Methods on Colour, Lipid Quality and Microbial Growth of Beef Patties Enhanced with Flaxseed Flour vol.33, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2013.33.1.58
  3. Sensory analysis as a tool to compare imported and local meat in outermost regions of Europe vol.41, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2012.739094
  4. Effects of dietary supplementation with polyphenols on meat quality in Saanen goat kids vol.14, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1513-1
  5. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging and vacuum packaging on quality characteristics of lamb meat vol.64, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-64-437-2021