한국물환경학회지 (Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment)

  • 제25권4호
  • /
  • Pages.494-501
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 2289-0971(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-098X(eISSN)
한국물환경학회 (Korean Society on Water Environment)
권호 표지

확률생태위해성평가(PERA) 선진국 사례분석 및 국내수계에 적합한 PERA 기법 제안

Comparative Study of Probabilistic Ecological Risk Assessment (PERA) used in Developed Countries and Proposed PERA approach for Korean Water Environment

  • An, Youn-Joo (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Nam, Sun-Hwa (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Woo-Mi (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2009.02.13
  • 심사 : 2009.05.04
  • 발행 : 2009.07.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Probabilistic Ecological risk assessment (PERA) is extensive approach to qualify and quantify risk on the multi species based on species sensitivity distribution (SSD). As a while, deterministic ecological risk assessment (DERA) considers the comparison of predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) and predicted exposure concentration (PEC). DERA is used to determine if there is potential risk or no risk, and it doesn't consider the nature variability and the species sensitivity. But PERA can be more realistic and reasonable approach to estimate likelihood or risk. In this study, we compared PERA used in developed countries, and proposed PERA applicable for the Korean water environment. Taxonomic groups were classified as "class" level including Actinopterygill, Branchiopoda, Chlorophyceae, Maxillapoda, Insects, Bivalvia, Gastropoda, Secernentea, Polychaeta, Monocotyldoneae, and Chanophyceae in this study. Statistical extrapolation method (SEM), statistical extrapolation method $_{acutechronicratio}$ ($SEM_{ACR}$) and assessment factor method (AFM) were used to calculate the ecological protective concentration based on qualitative and quantitative levels of taxonomic toxicity data. This study would be useful to establish the PERA for the protection of aquatic ecosystem in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 남선화, 양창용, 안윤주, 이재관(2007). 국내 생물종을 이용한 생태독성평가 기반연구 : (I) 어류. 한국육수학회지, 40(2), pp. 173-183
  2. 박용석, 이상구. 이승진, 문성경, 최은주, 이기태(2003). Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase를 이용한 Moina macrocopa 의 중금속 독성 검정. 한국환경독성학회지, 18(4), pp. 305-310
  3. 안윤주, 남선화, 이우미(2007). 국내 생물종을 이용한 생태 독성평가 기반연구 : (II) 물벼룩류. 한국육수학회지, 40(3), pp. 357-369
  4. 안윤주, 남선화, 백용욱(2008a). 국내 생물종을 이용한 생태 독성평가 기반연구 : (III) 녹조류. 한국하천호수학회지, 41(2), pp. 117-127
  5. 안윤주, 양창용, 남선화(2008b). 국내 적용가능한 중금속 수서독성에 대한 경도보정 알고리즘 연구. 한국하천호수학회지, 41(3), pp. 275-282
  6. 안윤주, 남선화, 김용화(2008c). 생태수질기준설정을 위한 대상물질의 생태위해성 평가. 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 24(5), pp. 592-597
  7. 환경부, 국립환경과학원(2006). 물환경종합평가방법 개발 조사연구(III) -인체 및 수생태계 위해성평가 체계 구축
  8. ANZECC and ARMCANZ (2000). Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality
  9. CCME (2003). Canadian environmental quality guidelines
  10. EC (2003). Technical guidance document on risk assessment
  11. EU (2007). European Union risk assessment report cadmium oxide and cadmium metal part Ⅰ - Environment
  12. Genderen, E. V., Gensemer, R., Simth, C., Santore, R., and Ryan, A. (2007). Evaluation of the biotic ligand model relative to other site-specific criteria derivation methods for copper in surface waters with elevated hardness. Aquatic Toxicology, 84(2), pp. 279-291 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.02.024
  13. George, T. K., Liber, K., Solomon, K. R., and Sibley, P. K. (2003). Assessment of the probabilistic ecological risk assessment-toxic equivalent combination approach for evaluating pesticide mixture toxicity to zooplankton in outdoor microcosms. Arch. Environm. Comtam. Toxicol., 45(4), pp. 453-461 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-003-2123-9
  14. Hope, B. K. (2006). An examination of ecological risk assessment and management practices. Environment International, 32(8), pp. 983-995 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.005
  15. Klimisch, H. J., Andreae, M., and Tillmann, U. (1997). A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 25(1), pp. 1-5 https://doi.org/10.1006/rtph.1996.1076
  16. OECD (1981). Guideline for Testing of Chemicals. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
  17. OECD (1995). Guidance document for aquatic effects assessment
  18. RIVM (2001). Guidance document on deriving environmental risk limits
  19. USEPA (1985). Guideline for deriving numerical national water quality criteria for the protection of aquatic organisms and their uses
  20. USEPA (2006). National recommended water quality criteria
  21. Verdonck, F. (2003). Geo-referenced probabilistic ecological risk assessment. Ghent University, Belgium