DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Cryopreservation on the Mouse Embryos at Various-pronuclear Stages

  • Park, M.C. (Infertility Medical Center of CHA General Hospital) ;
  • Kim, J.Y. (Infertility Medical Center of CHA General Hospital) ;
  • Kim, S.B. (Infertility Medical Center of CHA General Hospital) ;
  • Park, Y.S. (Kyongbuk Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Park, H.D. (Department of Biotechnology, Daegu University) ;
  • Lee, J.H. (College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University) ;
  • Oh, D.S. (College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-myeoung (College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University)
  • 투고 : 2008.05.09
  • 심사 : 2008.09.11
  • 발행 : 2009.02.01

초록

This study was carried out to establish an appropriate condition for the efficient cryopreservation of the mouse pronuclear embryo. In vitro cryopreservation of pronuclear embryos was carried out by slow freezing or vitrification methods and development rate of 2-cell, blastocyst and hatched blastocyst was measured as well as survival rate of the thawed pronuclear embryo. After slow freezing, vitrification and thawing of mouse pronuclear embryos, the survival rate and blastocyst development rate for the vitrification group was 97.3 and 53.4%, respectively, which was significantly higher as compared to the slow freezing group with 88.6 and 23.9%, respectively (p<0.05). Blastocyst developmental rate in each experimental group was significantly higher for 21 h in the post-hCG group at 40.5-57.0% than the 24 h post-hCG group at 40.5% (p<0.05). ICM (Inner cell mass) cell numbers of blastocyst-stage embryos during the different stages of mouse pronuclear embryos, slow freezing and vitrification period in the control and vitrification groups were 22.1${\pm}$2.7 and 17.0${\pm}$3.1-22.0${\pm}$3.2, respectively; hence, the slow freezing group (10.2${\pm}$2.0) had significantly higher cell numbers than those of the other two groups (p<0.05). Trophoblast (TE) cell number in the control group, 65.8${\pm}$12.6, was significantly higher than in the slow freezing group, 41.6${\pm}$11.1 (p<0.05). The total cell numbers in the control group and 21 h post hCG group were 87.9${\pm}$13.6 and 81.8${\pm}$14.1, respectively, and were significantly higher than for the slow freezing group (51.8${\pm}$12.6; p<0.05).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bautista, J. A., E. C. Dela Pena, S. Katagiri, Y. Takahashi and H. Kanagawa. 1998, In vitro viavility of mouse oocyte vitrified in an ethylene-glycol based solution, Jpn. J. Vet. Res. 46:13-18
  2. Chen, C. 1986, Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation, The Lancet, 327:884-886 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90989-X
  3. Cohen, J., G. W. DeVane, C. W. Elsner, C. B. Fehilly, H. I. Kort and J. B. Massey. 1988, Cryopreservation of zygotes early cleaved human embryos, Fertil. Steril, 49:283-289 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61689-6
  4. Cohen, J., R. S. Simons, C. B. Fehilly and R. G. Edwards. 1986, Factors affecting survival and implantation of cryopreserved human embryos, J. IVF. ET. 3:46-52 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131380
  5. Cooper, A., S. J. Paynter, B. J. Fuller and R. W. Shaw. 1998, Differential effects of cryopreservation on nuclear or cytoplasmic maturation in vitro in immature mouse oocytes from stimulated ovaries, Human Reprod, 13:971-978 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.4.971
  6. Courtney, B., Sheehan, M. Lane and D. K. Gardner. 2006, The cryoloop facilitates re-vitrification of embryos at four successive stages of development without imparing embryo growth, Hum. Reprod. 21:2978-2984 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del253
  7. Damario, M. A., D. G. Hammit, T. M. Galantis, D. R. Session and D. A. Dumesic, 1999. Pronuclear stage cryopreservation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional IVF: implications for timing of the freeze, Fertil. Steril. 72:1049-1054 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00444-6
  8. Fugger, E. F., M. Bustillo, L. P. Katz, A. D. Dorfman, S. D. Bender and J. D. Schuman. 1988, Embryonic development and pregnancy from fresh and cryopreservation sibling pronucleate human zygotes, Fertil. Steril. 50:273-278 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01603-4
  9. Gajda, B. and Z. Smorag. 1999, Factors affecting the sursvival of one- and two-cell rabbit embryos crypreserved by vitrification, Theridgenology 39:499-506
  10. Hashimoto, S., Y. Murata, M. Kikawa, M. Sonoda, H. Oku, T. Murata, K. Sugihara, F. Nagata, Y. Nakaoka, A. Fukuta and Y. Morimoto. 2007, Sussessful delvery after the transfer of twicevitrified embryos derived from in vitro matured oocytes: Acase Report, Hum. Reprod. 22:221-223 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del354
  11. Hu, J. H., Q. W. Li, G. Li, X. Y. Chen, H. Yang, S. S. Zhang and L. Q. Wang. 2006, The cryoprotective effect on frozen-thawed boar semen of egg yolk low density lipoproteins, Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:486-494
  12. Huang, W. T. and W. Holtz. 2002, Effects of meiotic stages, cryoprotectants, cooling and vitrification on the cryopreservation of porcine oocytes, Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:485-493
  13. Isachenok, V., M. Montag, E. Isachenko, V. Zaeva, I. Krivokharchenko, R. Shafei and H. Van der Ven. 2005, Asepic technology of vitrification of human pronuclear oocytes using open-pulled-straws, Human Reprod. 20:492-496
  14. Jang, H. Y., Y. S. Jung, H. T. Cheong, J. T. Kim, C. K. Park, H. S. Kong, H. K. Lee and B. K. Yang. 2008, Effects of cell status of bovine oviduct epithelial cell (BOEC) on the development of bovine IVM/IVF embryos and gene expression in the BOECused or not used for the embryo culture, Asian-Aust. J. Anim.Sci. 21:980-987
  15. Joshi, A., A. K. Mathur, S. M. K. Naqvi and J. P. Mittal. 2006, Influence of osmolality of complete semen extender on motion characteristics of frozen-thawed ram spermatozoa, Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:1716-1721
  16. Kang, D. W., S. H. Cho, J. H. Han, D. O. Kwack, H. J. Lee, S. Y. Choe and C. S. Park. 1999, Post-thaw development of rabbits pronuclear embryos by cryopreservation, Kor. J. Anim. Reprod.23:75-84
  17. Kasai, M., J. H. Komi, A. Takakamo, H. Taudwra, T. Sakurai and T. Machida. 1990, A simple method for mouse embryo cryopreservation in a low toxicity vitrification solution, without appreciable loss of viability, J. Reprod. Fertil. 89:91-97 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0890091
  18. Kim, J. Y., S. B. Kim, M. C. Park, H. Park, Y. S. Park, H. D. Park, J. H. Lee and J. M. Kim. 2007, Addition of macromolecules to PZM-3 culture medium on the development and hatching of in vitro porcine embryos, Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:1820-1826
  19. Kong, I. K., S. I. Lee, S. G. Cho and C. S. Park. 2000, Comparison of open pulled straw (OPS) vs. glass micropipette (GMP) vitrofication in mouse blastocysts, Theriogenol. 53:2598-2603
  20. Lee, C. K., B. C. Yang, G. S. Im, W. K. Chang, Y. K. Lee, S. J. Oh, D. I. Jin, K. S. Im and C. K. Lee. 2003, Survival and in vitro development of immature bovine oocytes cryopreserved by vitrification, Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:23-28
  21. Mandelbaum, J., J. Belaisch-Allart, A. M. Junka, J. M. Antoine, M Plachot and S. Alvarez. 1998, cryopreservation in human assisted reproduction is now routine for embryos but remains research procedure for oocyte, Hum. Reprod. 13:161-174
  22. Martino, A., N. Songsasen and S. P. Leibo. 1996, Development into blastocysts of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ultra-rapid cooling, Biol. Reprod. 54:1059-1069 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod54.5.1059
  23. Michelle, L. and K. David. Gardner. 2001, Vitrification of mouse oocytes using a nylon loop, Mol. Reprod. Dev. 58:342-347 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2795(200103)58:3<342::AID-MRD13>3.0.CO;2-X
  24. Misumi, K., M. Suzuki, S. Sato and N. Saito. 2003, Sussessful production of piglets derived from vitrified morulae and early blastocysts using a microdroplet method, Theriogenol. 60:253-260 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01364-X
  25. Mukaida, T., C. Oka, T. Goto and K. Takahashi. 2006, Artifical shrinkage of blastocoles using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts, Hum. Reprod. 21:3246-3252 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del285
  26. Rall, W. F. and G. M. Fahy. 1985, Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at -196C by vitrification, Nature 313:573-575 https://doi.org/10.1038/313573a0
  27. Rall, W. F. and M. J. Wood. 1994, High in vitro and in vivo survival of day 3mouse embryos vitrified or frozen in a nontoxic solution of glycerol and albumin, J. Reprod. Fertil. 101:681-688 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1010681
  28. Schattn, G., C. Simerly and H. Schatten. 1985, Microtuble configurations during fertilization, mitosis, and early development in the mouse and the requirement for egg microtubule-mediated motility during mammalian fertilization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82:4152-4156 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.12.4152
  29. Shaw, J. M., C. Ward and A. O. Trounson. 1995, Evaluation of propanediol, ethyleneglycol, sucrose and antifreeze proteins on the survival of slow-cooled mouse pronuclear and 4-cell embry, Hum. Reprod. 10:396-402
  30. Stachecki, J., J. Cohen and S. Willadsen. 1998, Detrimental effects of sodium during mouse oocyte Cryopreservation, Biol. Reprod. 59:395-400 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod59.2.395
  31. Sterzik, K., B. Fosenbusch, D. Grab, A. Whal, H. M. Beier and C. Lauritzen. 1992, Numerical chromosome anomalies after fertilization of freeze-thawed mouse oocytes, Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 251:133-138 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02718375
  32. Tachikawa, S., T. Otoi, S. Kondo, T. Machida and M. Kasai. 1993, Successful vitrification of bovine blastocysts, derivied by in vitro maturation and fertilization, Mol. Reprod. Dev. 34:266-271 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080340306
  33. Testart, J., B. Lassalle, J. Belaisch-Allart, A. Hazoult, R. Forman and J. D. Rainborn. 1986, High pregnancy rate after early human embryo freezing, Fertil. Steril. 46:268-272 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00773-8
  34. Trounson, A. and L. Mohr. 1983, Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo, Nature 305:707-709 https://doi.org/10.1038/305707a0
  35. Vajta, G., P. Holm, M. Kuwayama, P. J. Booth, H. Jacobsen, T. Greve and H. Callesen. 1998, Open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification. A new way to reduce cryoinjuries of bovine ova and embryos, Mol. Reprod. Develop. 51:53-58 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199809)51:1<53::AID-MRD6>3.0.CO;2-V
  36. Van Blerkom, J. 1989, Maturation at high frequency of germinal vesicle-stage mouse oocyte after cryopreservation: alterations in cytoplasmic, nuclear, nucleolar and chromosomal structure and organization associated with vitrification, Hum. Reprod. 4:883-893
  37. Van der Elst, J., S. Nerinckx and A. C. Van Sterteghem. 1993, Association of ultrarapid freezing of mouse oocytes with increased polyploid at the pronucleate stage, reduced cell numbers in blastocysts and impared fertal development, J. Reprod. Fertil. 99:25-32 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0990025
  38. Veeck, L. L., C. H. Amundson, L. J. Brothman, C. DeScisciolo, M. K. Maloney and S. J. Muasher. 1993, Significantly enhanced pregnancy rates per cycle through cryopreservation and thaw of pronuclear stage oocytes, Fertil. Steril. 59:1202-1207
  39. Wang, Z. G., S. D. Yu and G. R. Xu. 2007, Effects of collection methods on recovery efficiency, maturation rate and subsequent embryonic developmental competence of oocytes in holstein cow. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:496-500
  40. Whittngham, D. G., S. P. Leibo and P. Mazur. 1972, Survival of mouse embryos frozen to -196C an -269C, Sci. 178:411-414 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4059.411

피인용 문헌

  1. Establishment and characterization of a fibroblast cell line derived from Texel sheep vol.87, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1139/O09-005
  2. Establishment and characteristics of Iranian Sistani cattle fibroblast bank: a way to genetic conservation vol.9, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-016-0640-x
  3. Establishment and Characterization of the Fibroblast Line from Silkie Bantam vol.22, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80480
  4. γ-LA-Supplementation to IVC for IVP Bovine Embryos vol.23, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.80489