Impact of Pruning Intensity on Tree Growth and Closure of Pruning Wounds of Pinus strobus L. and Acer palmatum Thunb.

  • Lee, Kyu Hwa (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyung Joon (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2009.08.10
  • Accepted : 2009.10.21
  • Published : 2009.10.30

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the impact of pruning intensity on the vigor and cambial growth of the treated trees, and on the closure of pruning wounds for one year after pruning treatment. Two tree species, Pinus strobus and Acer palmatum, planted broadly in the urban forest of Korea were selected for the experiment. Intensity of pruning, which was estimated by proportion of removed branches, was categorized into five levels with about 10% intervals from lowest 8% up to 46%. Following parameters were examined; cambial electrical resistance (CER) and the cambial growth of trunk at 30 cm above the ground for the years before and after pruning, the cambial growth of stem at 1.5 cm above the branch bark ridge (BBR) of the pruned branch, and closure of pruning wound for one year after pruning. Tree vigor inferred from CER had a tendency to be weakened as pruning intensity increased in P. strobus, while that of A. palmatum was not affected. The trunk growth decreased significantly when the pruning intensity was higher than 30% in both species. The closure of individual pruning wound was related more to the cambial growth of stem at 1.5 cm above BBR than to the pruning intensity. Comparing the closure rate of pruning wound for one year, P. strobus with 72.1% was faster than A. palmatum with 39.3%, which corresponded with the rate of cambial growth of the two species.

Keywords

References

  1. American National Standard Institute. 2001. ANSI A300 (Part 1)-2001 Pruning. National Arborist Association. Manchester, NH
  2. Barret, L.J. and Downs, A.A. 1943. Growth response of white pine in southern Appalachians to green pruning. Journal of Forestry 41: 507-510
  3. Bennett, F.A. 1955. The effect of pruning on the height and diameter growth of planted slash pine. Journal of Forestry 53: 636-638
  4. Blanchard, R.O., Shortle, W.C. and Davis, W. 1983. Mechanism relating cambial electrical resistance to periodic growth rate of balsam fir. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13: 472-480 https://doi.org/10.1139/x83-071
  5. Buchanan, T.S. 1944. Effects of pruning young western white pine. Journal of Forestry 42: 365-366
  6. Clark, J., Kjelgran, R., Hushagen, J. and Fiore, J. 1992. Cambial electrical resistance does not assess vitality of individual sweet gum trees. Journal of Arboriculture 18: 1-5
  7. Gartner, B.L., Robbins, J.M. and Newton, M. 2005. Effects of pruning on wood density and tracheid length in young Douglas-fir. Wood and fiber science 37: 304-313
  8. Gillman, E.F. and Lilly, S.J. 2002. Best Management Practices: Tree Pruning. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL
  9. Hartman, J.R., Pirone, T.P. and Sall, M.A. 2000. Pirone's Tree Maintenance (7th ed.). Oxford University Press, New York
  10. Husch, B., Beers, T.W. and Kershaw, J.A., Jr. 2003. Forest Mensuration (4th ed.). John Wiley & Son, Inc., Hoboken, NJ
  11. Ishii, M., Mishima, K. and Fujii, E. 2003. An experimental study on the effects of the intensity of pruning on the top-growth of Quercus myrisinaeforia Blume. Landscape Research Japan 66: 477-480 https://doi.org/10.5632/jila.66.477
  12. Jin, H.O., Yi, M.J., Shin, Y.O., Kim, J.J. and Chon, S.K. 1994. Forest Pedology. Hyangmunsa, Seoul, Korea
  13. Kostka, S. and Sherald, J. 1982. An evaluation of electrical resistance as a measure of vigor in eastern white pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 12: 463-467 https://doi.org/10.1139/x82-072
  14. Lehtpere, R. 1957. The influence of high pruning on the growth of Douglas fir. Forestry 30: 9-20
  15. Lindberg, M. and Johansson, M. 1989. The use of electrical resistance of cambium and phloem as a measure of tree vigor. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 4: 175-185 https://doi.org/10.1080/02827588909382556
  16. McClay, T.A. 1953. The relation of growth to severity and season of pruning open-grown loblolly pine. Journal of Forestry 51: 287-288
  17. M$\O$ller, C.M. 1960. The influence of pruning on the growth of conifers. Forestry 33: 37-53
  18. Neely, D. 1970. Healing of wounds on trees. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 95: 536-540
  19. Neely, D. 1973. Tree wound healing and radial growth correlations. Hort Science 8: 384-385
  20. Neely, D. 1983. Tree trunk growth and wound closure. HortScience 18: 99-100
  21. Pinkard, E.A. and Beadle, C.L. 1998. Effects of green pruning on growth and stem shape of Eucalyptus nitens (Deane and Maiden) Maiden. New Forests 15: 107-126 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006533423884
  22. Shigo, A.L. 1989. Tree pruning: a worldwide photo guide for the proper pruning. Shigo and Trees, Associates. Durham, NH
  23. Shigo, A.L. and Larson, E. vH. 1969. A photo guide to the patterns of discoloration and decay in living northern hardwood trees. U.S.D.A. Forest Service Research Paper NE-127
  24. Shigo, A.L. and Marx, H.G. 1977. Compartmentalization of Decay In Trees, Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 405. Forest Service, U.S.D.A
  25. Shigo, A.L. and Shortle, W.C. 1985. Shigometry: A reference guide, Agriculture Handbook No. 646. Forest Service, U.S.D.A
  26. Shortle, W.S., Shigo, A.L., Berry, P. and Abusamra, J. 1977. Electrical resistance in tree cambium zone: relationship to rates of growth and wound closure. Forest Science 23: 326-329
  27. Shortle, W.C. 1979. Compartmentalization of decay in red maple and hybrid poplar trees. Phytopathology 69:410-413 https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-69-410
  28. Smith, D.M., Larson, B.C., Kelty, M.J. and Ashton, P.M.S. 1997. The Practice of Silviculture: Applied Forest Ecology (ninth ed.). John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York
  29. Stein, W.J. 1955. Pruning to different heights in young Douglas fir. Journal of Forestry 53: 352-355
  30. Wargo, P.M. 1977. Wound closure in sugar maple: adverse effects of defoliation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 7: 410-414 https://doi.org/10.1139/x77-051
  31. Wisniewski, M. and Wilson, C.L. 1985. Seasonal growth in cambial electrical resistance and its relation to growth in two cultivars of peach. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 65: 345-350 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps85-048