Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회지)

Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회)
권호 표지

Ecological Indicators of Forest Degradation after Forest Fire and Clear-cutting in the Siberian Larch (Larix sibirica) Stand of Mongolia

  • Park, Yeong Dae (Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Don Koo (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Stanturf, John A. (SRS-4104, USDA Forest Service) ;
  • Woo, Su Young (Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Zoyo, Damdinjav (Institute of Botany, Mongolian Academy of Sciences)
  • Received : 2009.08.31
  • Accepted : 2009.10.08
  • Published : 2009.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate ecological indicators of forest degradation after forest fire and clear-cutting in the Siberian larch (Larix sibirica Ledeb.) stand of Mongolia. The species abundance and biodiversity indices were higher in burned and clear-cut stands than those of reference stand, but boreal understory species, such as Vaccinium vitis-idaea, Pyrola incarnata, Linnea borealis and Maianthemum bifolium, completely disappeared and was replaced by sedge species, such as Carex duriuscula, C. lanceolata, C. pediformis, Poa attenuata and P. pratensis. During the research period, temperature increased by an average of $1.6^{\circ}C$ in burned stand and $1.7^{\circ}C$ in clear-cut stand compared to reference stand, but RH sharply decreased up to 15.7% in clear-cut stand. This result indicates that Larix sibirica stand became warmer and drier after forest fire and clear-cutting, and contributed to the abundance of sedge and grass species in the understory. Moreover, intense occupation of tall sedge grass after forest fire and clear-cutting had a vital role as obstacle on natural regeneration of Larix sibirica. The similarity of species composition between reference and burned stands was higher (73.6%) than between reference and clear-cut stands (63.8%). Soil moisture significantly decreased after forest fire and clear-cutting, and the extent of decrease was more severe in the clear-cut stand. The chemical properties at soil organic layer were significantly affected by forest fire and clear-cutting but not the mineral horizons. Inorganic nitrogen of the forest floor significantly decreased in the clear-cut stand ($1.1{\pm}0.4mg{\cdot}kg^{-1}$) than that of the burned ($4.5{\pm}2.3mg{\cdot}kg^{-1}$) and reference stands ($5.0{\pm}2.3mg{\cdot}kg^{-1}$). Available P of the forest floor significantly increased after fire, whereas it decreased after clear-cutting. These results indicate that existence of boreal understory vegetation, and changes in soil moisture and available P are distinct attributes applicable as ecological indicators for identifying forest degradation in Mongolia.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Korea Research Foundation

References

  1. Angelstam, P.K. 1998. Maintaining and restoring biodiversity in European boreal forests by developing natural disturbance regimes. Journal of Vegetation Science 9(4): 593-602 https://doi.org/10.2307/3237275
  2. Bigham, J.M. 1986. Methods of soil analysis, Part 3, Chemical methods. 2nd edition. Monograph No. 9, ASA, Madison, Wisconsin
  3. Clewell, A. F. and J. Aronson. 2006. Motivations for the restoration of ecosystems. Conservation Biology 20(20): 420-428
  4. DeBano, L.F., D.G. Neary and P.F. Ffolliott. 1998. Fire’s Effects on Ecosystems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 333pp
  5. de Romer, H. Andre, D.D. Kneeshaw and Y. Bergeron. 2007. Small gap dynamics in the southern boreal forest of eastern Canada: Do canopy gaps influence stand development? Journal of Vegetation Science 18: 815-826
  6. Dodson, E.K., K.L. Metlen and C.E. Fiedler. 2007. Common and uncommon understory species differentially respond to restoration treatments in ponderosa pine/douglas-fir forests, Montana. Restoration Ecology 15(4): 696-708
  7. Everett, R., D. Zabowski and P. McColley. 1990. Vegetative restoration of western-montane forest soils. Pages 29-31 in Proceedings of Management and Productivity of Western Montane Forest Soils. April 10-12, 1990. Boise, ID, USA
  8. Fisher, R.F. and D. Binkley. 2000. Ecology and Management of Forest Soils. John Wiley & Sons. USA. 489pp
  9. Giardina, C.P. and C.C. Rhoades. 2001. Clear cutting and burning affect nitrogen supply, phosphorus fractions and seedling growth in soils from a Wyoming lodgepole pine forest. Forest Ecology and Management 140: 19-28 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00272-3
  10. Gombosuren, N. 1992. The Role of Sub-taiga Larch Forest for Water Regulation and Soil Conservation at Eastern Khenti, Mongolia. Ph. D. Dissertation. Agricultural University. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  11. Grubov, V.I. 1982. Key to the Vascular Plants of Mongolia. Science Publisher Inc. USA. 817pp
  12. Harris, J.A. 2003. Measurements of the soil microbial community for estimating the success of restoration. European Journal of Soil Science 54: 801-808 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1351-0754.2003.0559.x
  13. Keddy, P.A. and C.G. Drummond. 1996. Ecological properties for the evaluation, management, and restoration of temperate deciduous forest ecosystems. Ecological Applications 6(3): 748-762 https://doi.org/10.2307/2269480
  14. Kent, M. and P. Coker. 1994. Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach. John Wiley & Sons. 363pp
  15. Klute, A. 1986. Methods of soil analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd edition. Monograph No. 9, ASA, Madison, Wisconsin
  16. Krzic, M., R.F. Newman and K. Broersma. 2003. Plant species diversity and soil quality in harvested and grazed boreal aspen stands of northeastern British Columbia. Forest Ecology and Management 182: 315-325 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00064-1
  17. Li, S.-G., J. Asanuma, A. Kotani, W. Eugster, G. Davaa, D. Oyunbaatar, and M. Sugita. 2005. Year-round measurements of net ecosystem CO2 flux over a montane larch forest in Mongolia. Journal of Geophysical Research 110: D09303, doi:10.1029/2004JD005453
  18. Ludwig, J.A. and J.F. Reynolds. 1988. Statistical Ecology. Wiley Interscience, New York. 337pp
  19. McLachlan, S.M. and D.R. Bazely. 2001. Recovery patterns of understory herbs and their use as indicators of deciduous forest regeneration. Conservation Biology 15: 98-110
  20. Messier, C., S. Parent and Y. Bergeron. 1998. Effects of overstory and understory vegetation on the understory light environment in mixed boreal forests. Journal of Vegetation Science 9(4): 511-520 https://doi.org/10.2307/3237266
  21. Ministry of Nature and Environment of Mongolia. 2002. State of the Environment of Mongolia. Ulaanbaatar. 57pp
  22. Nichols, O.G. and C.D. Grant. 2007. Vertebrate fauna recolonization of restored Bauxite mines - Key findings from almost 30 years of monitoring and research. Restoration Ecology 15(4): 116-126
  23. Ohlson, M., L. Soderstrom, G. Hornberg, O. Zackrisson and J. Hermansson. 1997. Habitat qualities versus longterm continuity as determinants of biodiversity in Boreal old-growth swamp forests. Biological Conservation 81: 221-231 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00001-3
  24. Piirainen, S., L. Finer, H. Mannerkoski and M. Starr. 2007. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus leaching after site preparation at a boreal forest clear-cut area. Forest Ecology and Management 243: 10-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.053
  25. Pugachev, A.A., E.A. Tikhmenev and P.E. Tikhmenev. 2005. Natural recovery of technogenic landscapes in open larch forests in northeastern Russia. Russian Journal of Ecology 36(6): 391-395 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11184-005-0091-1
  26. Rees, D.C. and G.P. Juday. 2002. Plant species diversity on clear-cut versus burned sites in central Alaska. Forest Ecology and Management 155: 291-302 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00566-7
  27. Reich, P.B., P. Bakken, D. Carlson, L.E. Frelich, S.K. Friedman and D. F. Grigal. 2001. Influence of logging, fire, and forest type on biodiversity and productivity in southern boreal forests. Ecology 82(10): 2731-2748 https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2731:IOLFAF]2.0.CO;2
  28. Ruiz-Jaen, M.C. and T.M. Aide. 2005. Restoration success: How is it being measured? Restoration Ecology 13(3): 569-577 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00072.x
  29. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group. 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. www.ser.org & Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International
  30. Thomas, T.L. and J.K. Agee. 1986. Prescribed fire effects on mixed conifer forest structure at Crater Lake, Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16: 1082-1087 https://doi.org/10.1139/x86-187
  31. Tsogtbaatar, J. 2004. Deforestation and reforestation needs in Mongolia. Forest Ecology and Management 201(1): 57-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.06.011
  32. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2002. Mongolia: State of the Environment. Ulaanbaatar
  33. Venturelli, R.C. and A. Galli. 2006. Integrated indicators in environmental planning: Methodological considerations and applications. Ecological Indicators 6: 228-237 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.023
  34. Wyant, J.G., R.A. Meganck and S.H. Ham. 1995. A planning and decision-making framework for ecological restoration. Environmental Management 6: 789-796 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471932
  35. Zoyo, D. 2000. The changes of herbaceous and bush cover in larch and pine forests after cutting and forest fire. Ph. D. Dissertation. Mongolian National University, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia