Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics

대한소아청소년과학회 (The Korean Pediatric Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

발달 지연아에서 한국형 영유아 발달 검사와 베일리 영유아 발달 검사의 비교 분석

Assessment of children with developmental delay: Korean infant and child development test (KICDT) and Korean Bayley scale of infant development-II (K-BSID-II)

  • 김지훈 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 소아청소년과) ;
  • 염미선 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 소아청소년과) ;
  • 정수진 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 소아청소년과) ;
  • 고태성 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 소아청소년과)
  • Kim, Ji-Hoon (Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Yum, Mi-Sun (Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Jeong, Soo-Jin (Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Ko, Tae-Sung (Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2009.02.02
  • 심사 : 2009.04.27
  • 발행 : 2009.07.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목 적 : 발달 지연이 있는 환아들을 대상으로 한국형 영유아 발달 검사와 K-BSID-II를 병행하여 서로 간의 상관 관계와 일치도를 분석함으로써 유사한 발달 영역에서 동일한 판정 정도를 확인하고자 하였다. 방 법 : 2007년 2월부터 2008년 6월까지 서울 아산 병원 소아청소년과에 발달 지연을 주소로 내원한 월령 42개월 이하의 환자 28명을 대상으로 하여 한국형 영유아 발달 검사 및 K-BSID-II를 시행하였다. 월령별로 12개월 이하와 13-24, 25-42개월 대상자로, 기질적 뇌병변이 두부 자기 공명 단층 촬영에 의해 확인되었던 군과 그렇지 않은 군으로 분류하여 각각의 한국형 영유아 발달 검사 결과와 K-BSID-II 결과를 비교하였다. 통계 분석은 SPSS를 사용하여 상관 관계를 분석하고 SAS를 사용하여 급내 상관 계수(Intraclass correlation coefficient)를 구하여 일치도를 분석하였다. 결 과 : 상관 관계 면에서 K-BSID-II의 인지 척도는 한국형 영유아 발달 검사의 전 영역과, 동작 척도는 조대 운동, 개인-사회성, 언어, 인지-적응 영역과 통계적으로 유의미한 상관을 나타내었다(P<0.01). 일치도 면에서 K-BSID-II의 인지 척도는 한국형 영유아 발달 검사의 조대 운동, 미세운동, 언어 영역과, 동작 척도는 조대 운동과 높은 일치도를 보였다(P<0.05). 결 론 : 발달 지연이 있는 환아에서 한국형 영유아 발달 검사는 조대 운동을 비롯한 여러 하위 영역에서 K-BSID-II와 유의한 상관 관계 및 일치도를 보였으며 한국 영유아의 발달 정도를 파악하는 비교적 정확한 지표로 사용될 수 있음을 시사한다.

Purpose : We aimed to compare the effectiveness of 2 developmental tests-Korean Infant and Child Development Test (KICDT) and Korean Bayley Scale of Infant Development-II (K-BSID-II)-in the assessment of children with developmental delay. Methods : Twenty-eight children with suspected developmental delay, who visited the Department of Pediatrics in Asan Medical Center from February 2007 to June 2008 were enrolled. They were examined using both KICDT and K-BSID-II. The results of the tests were compared on the basis of 2 parameters: age group of the children and detection of organic brain lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The correlation between the results of the 2 tests was analyzed using SPSS. Further, intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated using SAS to examine consistency between the results of the 2 tests. Results : The mental developmental index of K-BSID-II showed significant correlation with every KICDT score (P<0.01). The psychomotor developmental index of K-BSID-II was also significantly correlated with every KICDT score except the fine motor score (P<0.01). The mental developmental index of K-BSID-II showed significant correlation [Editor20] with the KICDT gross motor, fine motor, and language scores (P<0.05). Further, there was significant correlation between the psychomotor developmental index of K-BSID-II and the KICDT gross motor score (P<0.05). Conclusion : There was significant [Editor21]correlation between the results of KICDT and K-BSID-II for infants and children with developmental delay. Although our results suggest that KICDT is useful in assessing developmental delay, further research would be needed to standardize this test.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Edwards SL, Sarwark JF. Infant and child motor development. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;434:33-9
  2. Yeargin-Allsopp M, Murphy CC, Oakley GP, Sikes RK. A multiple-source method for studying the prevalence of developmental disabilities in children: the metropolitan Atlanta developmental disabilities study. Pediatrics 1992;189:624-30
  3. Achenbach TM, Phares V, Howell CT, Raun VA, Nurcombe B. Seven-year outcome of Vermont intervention program for low-birth weight infants. Child Dev 1990;61:1672-81 https://doi.org/10.2307/1130830
  4. Wolf MJ, Koldewijn K, Beelen A, Smith B, Hedlund R, de Groot IJ. Neurobehavioral and developmental profile of very low birth weight preterm infants in early infancy. Acta Paediatr 2002;91:930-8 https://doi.org/10.1080/080352502760148667
  5. Casey P, Sharp M, Loda F. Child-health supervision for children under 2 years of age : a review of its content and effectiveness. J Pediatr 1979;95:1-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(79)80073-6
  6. Squires J, Nickel R, Eisert D. Early detection of developmental problems: Strategies for monitoring young children in the practice setting. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1996;17:420-7 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004703-199612000-00008
  7. Levy SE, Hyman SL. Pediatric assessment of the child with developmental delay. Pediatr Clin North Am 1993;40:465-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3955(16)38544-3
  8. Chamberlain RW. Developmental assessment and early intervention programs for young children : Lessons learned from longitudinal research. Pediatr Rev 1987;8:237-47 https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.8-8-237
  9. Bennett FC, Guralnick NJ. Effectiveness of developmental intervention in the first five years of life. Pediatr Clin North Am 1991;38:1513-28
  10. Blackman JA, Healy A, Ruppert ES. Participation by pediatricians in early intervention: Impetus from Public Law 99- 457. Pediatrics 1992;89:98-102
  11. First LRF, Palfrey JS. The Infant or young child with developmental delay. N Engl J Med 1994;330:478-83 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199402173300708
  12. Shonkoff J, Hauser-Cram P. Early intervention for disabled infants and their families: A quantitative analysis. Pediatrics 1987;80:650-8
  13. Palmer FB, Shapiro BK, Wachtel RC, Allen MC, Hiller JE, Harryman SE, et al. The effects of physical therapy on cerebral palsy : a controlled trial in infants with spastic diplegia. N Engl J Med 1988;318:303-8 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198803313181302
  14. Blasco PA. Pitfalls in developmental diagnosis. Pediatr Clin North Am 1991;38:1425-37
  15. Strauss D, Ashwal S, Shavelle R, Eyman RK. Prognosis for survival and improvement in function in children with severe developmental disabilities. J Pediatr 1997;131:712-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(97)70098-2
  16. Sass-Leher M, Bodner-Johnson B. Public Law 99-457: a new challenge to early intervention. Am Ann Deaf 1989;134:71-7
  17. Glascoe FP. Are overreferrals on developmental screening tests really a problem? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155: 54-9 https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.155.1.54
  18. DeGraw C, Edell D, Ellers B, Hillemeier M, Liebman J, Perry C, et al. Public Law 99-457 : new opportunities to serve young children with special needs. J Pediatr 1988;113:971-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(88)80565-1
  19. Dworkin PH. British and American recommendations for developmental monitoring: The role of surveillance. Pediatrics 1989;84:1000-10
  20. Chung SJ, Sung IK, Kim HJ, Woo YJ, Lee MH, Shin SM. Developmental Test in Children. Korean J Pediatr 2002;45: 817-821
  21. Kim SG, Kim NC, Lee KI, Oh MH, Kim YC, Lee HJ. In comparative study between Baley scales of Infant development-? and korean infant and child development test in infant younger than 12 months. J Korean Child Neurol 2005;13:48- 56
  22. Jae KS. A Study for the Scaling of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for Korean Infants. Korean Journal of Child Studies 1984;5:53-64
  23. Chung MJ, Rhee UH, Park KJ. A Preliminary Study for the Standardization of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for Korean Infants. Korean Journal of Child Studies 1993;14: 5-21
  24. Park HW, Cho BH, Choi HJ. The standardization of Korean Bayley Scales of Infant Development(K-BSID-II): A Pilot study. The Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology 2003;16:121-34
  25. Cho BH, Park HW. The standardization study (1) of Korean Bayley Scales of Infant Development (K-BSID-II): Analyses of Kprean Infants performance of K-BSID-II in terms of demographical variables The Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology 2004;17:191-206
  26. Ross G, Lipper EG, Auld PA. Consistency and change in the development of prematurity infants weighing less than 1,501 grams at birth. Pediatrics 1985;76:885-91
  27. Ross G, Lipper EG, Auld PA. Educational status and school- related abilities of very low birth weight premature children. Pediatrics 1991;88:1125-34
  28. Sajaniemi N, Makela J, Salokorpi T, von Wendt L, Hamalarinen T, Hakamies-Blomqvist L. Congnitive performance and attatchment patterns at four years of age in extremely low birth weight infants after early intervention. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;10:122-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s007870170035
  29. Lee K. Standardization of the Denver developmental screening test on Seoul children. J Korean Pediatr Soc 1987;30: 958-71
  30. Lee K. Denver II developmental screening test and development of Seoul children. J Korean Pediatr Soc 1996;39:1210-5
  31. Sung MH, Choi JM, Yoo JH, Lee YS, Hwang KG, Lee YA. Developmental Quotient of Very Low Birth Weight Infants assessed by Korean Infant Development Screening Test. J Korean Soc Neonatol 2004;11:152-9
  32. Shin DH, Lee HS, Lee JY, Choi BM, Eun BL, Hong YS, et al. Usefulness of Korean Infant Developmental Screening Test in Premature Infants. Korean Journal of Pediatrics 2005;48:1337-41
  33. Van Karnebeek CD, Jansweijer MC, Leenders AG, Offringa M, Hennekam RC. Diagnostic investigations in individuals with mental retardation: a systematic literature review of their usefulness. Eur J Hum Genet 2005;13:6-25 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201279
  34. Shevell MI, Majnemer A, Rosenbaum P, Abrahamowicz M. Etiologic yield of subspecialists evaluation of young children with global developmental delay. J Pediatr 2000;136:593-8 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2000.104817

피인용 문헌

  1. Low prevalence of argininosuccinate lyase deficiency among inherited urea cycle disorders in Korea vol.63, pp.8, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-018-0467-2
  2. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes after Congenital Heart Disease Surgery in Infancy: A 2-Year Serial Follow-Up vol.8, pp.10, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3390/children8100911