An Analysis of Plantar Foot Pressure Distribution and COP Trajectory Path in Lifting Posture

들기 자세에서 족저의 압력 분포와 압력중심 이동거리의 분석

  • Lee, Myoung-Hee (Department of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Daegu University) ;
  • Han, Jin-Tae (Department of Physical Therapy, Sunlin College) ;
  • Bae, Sung-Soo (Department of Physical Therapy, Daegu University)
  • 이명희 (대구대학교 대학원) ;
  • 한진태 (선린대학 물리치료과) ;
  • 배성수 (대구대학교 재활과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2008.10.27
  • Accepted : 2009.03.05
  • Published : 2009.03.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of two different lifting posture on the plantar foot pressure, force and COP(center of pressure) trajectory path during object lifting. Fourteen healthy adults who had no musculoskeletal disorders were instructed to lift with two postures(stoop and squat) and two object weights(empty box and 10 kg box). Plantar foot pressures, forces and COP trajectory path were recorded by the F-mat system(Tekscan, Boston, USA) during object lifting with barefoot. Plantar foot surface was defined as seven regions for pressure measurement; two toe regions, three forefoot regions, one midfoot region and one heel region. Paired t-test was used to compare the outcomes of peak pressure and maximum force with different two lifting postures and two object weights. Plantar peak pressure and maximum force under hallux was significantly greater in squat posture than stoop posture during the two different boxes lifting(p<.05). During the empty box lifting, maximum force under lessor toes was significantly less and plantar peak pressure under second metatarsal region was significantly greater in squat than stoop(p<.05). Maximum force under heel was significantly less in squat than stoop posture during 10kg box lifting(p<.05). Finally, COP trajectory path was significantly greater in squat than stoop(p<.05). These findings confirm that there are significantly change in the structure and function of the foot during the object lifting with different posture. Future studies should focus on the contribution of both structural and functional change to the development of common foot problems in adults.

Keywords

References

  1. 기도형, 정민근. 들기작업 설계와 평가를 위한 요천추의 Compressive Force 예측모형. 대한산업공학회지. 1995:21(4);581-591
  2. 김경, 박영한, 배성수. Intermachine Validity and Reliability of The F-mat and F-scan. 대한물리치료학회지 2000;12(2):29-37
  3. 김상호 , 정민근 , 임종호 , 이인석 , 민경록. 인간공학 (Ⅲ) : 정비 작업에서의 요통 발생 현황 및 근력 평가. 대한산업공학회 춘계공동학술대회집. 1996:647- 650
  4. 노동부. 산업재해통계. 2006
  5. 노정석, 김택훈. Parotec System 을 이용한 족저압 측정의 신뢰도. 한국전문물리치료학회지 2001;8(3);35-41
  6. 양성환, 최정화, 박범. 인력물자취급작업에 있어서의 요추부하 평가에 관한 연구. 대한설비관리학회지 1999;4(3):83-92
  7. 이상도, 우동필. 인력물자취급시 작업자의 근육피로 분석에 관 한 생 체 역 학 적 연 구 . 대 한 설 비 관 리 학 회 지 1999;4(2):61-69
  8. 최경임, 정민근, 민경록. 포항지역 사례를 중심으로 한 직업성 요통재해 현황 조사에 대한 고찰. 대한인간공학회춘계학술대회논문집 1996:91-97
  9. 한국산업안전공단. 산업재해원인조사 : 질병명별 작업내용별현황(작업내용별,질병명별). 2004
  10. Burgess-Limerick R, Abernethy B. Effect of load distance on selfselected manual lifting technique. Int J Ind Ergon. 1998;22:367-372 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00090-5
  11. Kilbom A. Assessment of physical exposure in relation to workrelated musculoskeletal disorders-what information can be obtained from systematic observations? Scand J Work Environ Health 1994;20:30-45
  12. Kumar S. Development of predictive equations for lifting strengths. Applied Ergonomics 1995;26(5): 327-341 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(95)00037-2
  13. Kumar S, Garand D. Static and dynamic lifting strength at different reach distances in symmetrical and asymmetrical planes. Ergonomics 1992 ;35(7-8):861-880 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139208967367
  14. Straker L. Evidence to support using squat, semi-squat and stoop techniques to lift low-lying objects . Int J Ind Ergon 2003:31(3);149-160 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00191-9