A reappraisal of Sambucus pendula Nakai on Ulleung Island and its allies

울릉도 말오줌나무와 근연종의 재검토

  • Lim, Hyo-In (Department of Forest Sciences and The Arboretum, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chang, Kae Sun (Department of Forest Sciences and The Arboretum, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Heung Soo (Department of Forest Sciences and The Arboretum, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chang, Chin-Sung (Department of Forest Sciences and The Arboretum, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Hui (Department of Medicinal Plants Resources, Mokpo National University)
  • 임효인 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 산림과학부 및 수목원) ;
  • 장계선 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 산림과학부 및 수목원) ;
  • 이흥수 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 산림과학부 및 수목원) ;
  • 장진성 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 산림과학부 및 수목원) ;
  • 김휘 (목포대학교 응용생명공학부 한약자원전공)
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

Sambucus pendula Nakai, which is an endemic on Ulleung Island of Korea, is characterized by a large pendulous inflorescence and small fruit. A set of 256 individuals were used to investigate the patterns of intraspecific variation of S. racemosa subsp. kamtchatica, S. racemosa subsp. sieboldiana, and S. williamsii including S. pendula using PCA (principal components analysis). This analysis showed that S. pendula was distinct based on its large inflorescence and long peduncle. Our data showed a morphological distinction between subsp. kamtchatica from northeastern areas and subsp. sieboldiana from Jeju Island, but the two taxa overlap in the southern and eastern parts of Korea in terms of chromosome number, color of style, and allozyme data. Our study agrees that S. pendula on Ulleung Island may be the result of genetic drift that occurred during isolation since the Quarternary period. This has been suggested as a reason for the genetic differences observed between two taxa and would explain the unique variation patterns of S. pendula. However, the morphological differentiation between the S. racemosa complex and S. pendula is not considered sufficient to warrant recognition of specific status. Therefore, we recommend that only one polymorphic species of S. racemosa in Eurasia be recognized and that S. pendula be considered a subspecies of S. racemosa.

울릉도에 분포하는 말오줌나무는 화서가 크고 아래로 처지며 열매가 다른 분류군에 비해 작은 특징때문에 한반도 고유종으로 간주되었다. 본 연구는 근연종인, 지렁쿠나무, 덧나무, 딱총나무를 포함한 총 256개 개체에 대해 주성분분석(PCA)을 통해 각 분류군간 형태적 특징을 비교하였는데, 형태 분석 결과 말오줌나무는 지렁쿠나무와 덧나무에 비해 화서의 크기가 크고 총화경이 길어 뚜렷한 차이가 있었다. 이런 화서의 특징 이외에 말오줌나무의 암술머리 색깔은 덧나무와 지렁쿠나무의 혼합형이며, 동위효소와 염색체 수의 경우에는 덧나무에 더 가까웠다. 반면 말오줌나무는 한반도 내의 다른 개체들과 형태적으로 불연속을 보이는데, 이는 한반도 내 분류군들 간에는 지속적인 유전적 교류가 있었던 반면, 울릉도의 말오줌나무는 신생대 4기 이후 섬 지역에 고립되어 형태적으로는 비교적 고착화된 것으로 판단된다. 전 세계 딱총나무속의 연구에 의하면 종간 잡종 현상이 활발히 보고되는데, 현재 본 연구에서 분석된 지렁쿠나무와 덧나무의 형질의 혼합 혹은 중간 형태는 잡종에 의한 결과인지, 혹은 형질의 연속변이로 인한 결과인지는 불확실하다. 유라시아와 북미 대륙에 넓게 분포하는 Sambucus racemosa L.는 지역적으로 일부 분류군들이 분화하여 기존에 아종으로 처리되고, 동북아시아에서는 지렁쿠나무와 덧나무의 실체가 확인되지만 여전히 각 분류군간에 형태적으로 중첩이 된다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 말오줌나무를 S. racemosa의 아종, 즉 S. racemosa subsp. pendula로 처리하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 산림청, 과학재단(KOSEF)

References

  1. Atkinson, M. D. and E. Atkinson. 2002. Sambucus nigra L. J. Ecol. 90: 895-923 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00698.x
  2. Addinsoft. 2008. XLSTAT version 8.0 (online). Available from http://www.xlstat.com. Addinsoft, Brooklyn, New York
  3. Bailey, L. H. 1902. Cyclopedia of American Horticulture. Vol. 4. Macmillan Co., New York. Pp. 1609-1610
  4. Benko-Iseppon, A. M. and W. Morawetz. 2000. Viburnales: Cytological features and a new circumscription. Taxon 49: 5-16 https://doi.org/10.2307/1223927
  5. Bolli, R. 1994. Revision of the genus Sambucus. Diss. Bot. 223: 1-227
  6. Chang, C. S. 1991. A morphometric analyses of genus Acer L., section Palmata Pax, series Palmata. Korean J. Pl. Taxon. 21:165-186
  7. Chang, C. S. 2001. Reconsideration of Acer pictum complex in Korea. Korean J. Pl. Taxon. 31: 283-309 (in Korean)
  8. Chang, C. S, H. Choi and K. S. Chang. 2004. Reconsideration of Prunus sargentii complex in Korea: with respect to P. sargentii and P. takesimensis. Korean J. Pl. Taxon. 34: 221-244 (in Korean)
  9. Charkevicz, S. S. 1987. Plantae Vasculares Orientis Extremi Sovietici. Vol. 2. Nauka, St. Petersburg. Pp. 293-297 (in Russian)
  10. Conkle, M. T., P. Hodgskiss, L. Nunally and S. Hunter. 1982. Starch Gel Electrophoresis of Conifer Seeds: A Laboratory Manual. General Technical Report PSW-64. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest and Range Experiment Station, Washington DC. Pp. 1-18
  11. Darlington, C. D. and A. P. Wylie. 1955. Chromosome Atlas of Flowering Plants. 2nd ed. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London. Pp. 242-243
  12. Darlington, C. D. and L. F. La Cour. 1962. The Handling of Chromosomes. 4th ed. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London. Pp. 19-49
  13. Eriksson, T. and M. J. Donoghue. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of Sambucus and Adoxa (Adoxoideae, Adoxaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences and preliminary morphological data. Syst. Bot. 22: 555-573 https://doi.org/10.2307/2419828
  14. Ferguson, I. K. 1966. The genera of Caprifoliaceae in the Southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 47: 33-59
  15. Fukuoka, N. 1987. Classification and distribution of Sambucus. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 38: 303-310 (In Japanese)
  16. Hance, H. F. 1866. Adversaria in stirpes criticas. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. ser. 5, 5: 217
  17. Hara, H. 1956. Contributions to the study of variations in the Japanese plants closely related to those of Europe or North America. Part 2. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Sect. 3, Bot. 6: 381-385
  18. Hara, H. 1983. A revision of Caprifoliaceae of Japan with reference to allied plants in other districts and the Adoxaceae. Gingkoana 5: 276-300
  19. Hounsell, R. W. 1968. Cytological studies in Sambucus. Canad. J. Genet. Cytol. 10: 235-247
  20. Hsu, P.-S. 1988. Sambucus. In Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae Vol. 72. Hsu, P. -S., J.-Q. Hu and H.-J. Wang (eds.), Science Press, Beijing. Pp. 1-11 (in Chinese)
  21. Hultn, E. 1930. Flora of Kamtchatka and the adjacent islands. Kungl. Svenska Vetenskapsakd. Handl. 4: 139-141, 297
  22. Im, R. J. 2000. Flora Coreana. Vol. 8. The Science and Technology Pub. House, Pyongyang. Pp. 49-55 (in Korean)
  23. Jong, K. 1997. Laboratory Manual of Plant Cytological Techniques. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh. Pp. 3-29
  24. Kawamoto, T. 1943. Illustrated Manual of Korean Trees and Shrubs (= Chosen Shinrin Shokubutsu Zusetsu). Chosen Natural History Museum Society, Seoul. Pp. 658-663 (in Japanese)
  25. Kephart, S. R. 1990. Starch gel electrophoresis of plant isozymes: A comparative analysis of techniques. Amer. J. Bot. 77: 693-712 https://doi.org/10.2307/2444817
  26. Kitamura, S. and G. Murata. 1984. Colored Illustrations of Woody Plants of Japan. Vol. 1. Horikusha Pub. Co., Osaka. Pp. 36-37 (in Japanese)
  27. Kurata, S. 1973. Illustrated Important Forest Trees of Japan. Vol. 4. Japan Forest Technical Association (eds.), Chikysha Co. Ltd., Tokyo. Pp. 90-91, 198-199
  28. Lee, T. B. 1966. Bibliography of the Illustrated Woody Plants of Korea. Forest Experiment Station, Seoul. Pp. 341-342 (in Korean)
  29. Lee, T. B. 1980. Illustrated Flora of Korea. Hyang-mun Pub. Co., Seoul. Pp. 702-703 (in Korean)
  30. Lee, W. T. 1996. Lineamenta Florae Koreae. Academy Pub. Co., Seoul. Pp. 1042-1044 (in Korean)
  31. Lee, Y. N. 1996. Flora of Korea. Kyo-hak Pub. Co. Ltd., Seoul. Pp. 738-740 (in Korean)
  32. Nakai, T. 1916. Notulae ad Plantas Japoniae et Coreae. XII. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 30: 274-290 (In Japanese)
  33. Nakai, T. 1917. Sambuci Japonici et Coreani. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 31: 210-214
  34. Nakai, T. 1921a. Flora Sylvatica Koreana. Vol. 11. Government of Chosen, Forestal Experiment Station, Seoul. Pp. 21-29 (in Japanese)
  35. Nakai, T. 1921b. Tentamen systematis Caprifoliacearum Japonicarum. J. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokyo 42: 7-14
  36. Nakai, T. 1926. Notulae ad Plantas Japoniae et Koreae XXXII. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 40: 473-480
  37. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590
  38. Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 1992. Enzyme Nomenclature. http:// www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iubmb/enzyme/ (June 1, 2009)
  39. Ohba, H. 2001. Sambucus. In Flora of Japan. Vol. 3a. Iwatsuki, K., T. Yamazaki, D. E. Boufford, and H. Ohba (eds.), Kodansha Ltd., Tokyo. Pp. 428-430
  40. Ohwi, J. 1984. Flora of Japan. Smithsonian Institute, Washington, DC. Pp. 833-834
  41. Ourecky, D. K. 1970. Chromosome morphology in the genus Sambucus. Amer. J. Bot. 57: 239-244 https://doi.org/10.2307/2485300
  42. Poyarkova, A. I. 2000. Sambucus. In Flora of the U.S.S.R. Vol. 23. Schischkin, B. K. (ed.), Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh and Koeltz Scientific Books, India. Pp. 501-529
  43. Rehder, A. 1940. Manual of Cultivated Trees and Shrubs, 2nd ed. The Macmillan Co., New York. Pp. 827-830
  44. Schwerin, F. 1909. Monographie der gattung Sambucus. Mitt. Deutsch. Dendrol. Ges. 18: 1-56
  45. Schwerin, F. 1920. Revisio generis Sambucus. Mitt. Deutsch. Dendrol. Ges. 29: 194-231
  46. Simonovik, B. A. Ivancic, J. Jakse, and B. Bohanec. 2007. Production and genetic evaluation of interspecific hybrids within the genus Sambucus. Pl. Breed. (New York) 126: 628-633 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01400.x
  47. Spach, E. 1839. Les Viburnes.-Viburneae. Hist. Nat. Veg. (Spach) 8: 305-306, 320-323
  48. Swofford, D. L. 1981. BIOSYS-1: A computer program for the analysis of allelic variation in population genetics and biochemical systematics. Release 7. Illinois National History Survey
  49. Sun, B. Y. and T. F. Stuessy. 1998. Preliminary observations on theevolution of endemic angiosperms of Ullung Island, Korea. In Evolution and Speciation of Island Plants. Stuessy, T. F. and M. Ono (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Pp. 181-202
  50. Uehara, K. 1961. Great Illustrated Book of Trees. Vol. III. Ariakeshobou, Tokyo. Pp. 1047-1053 (in Japanese)
  51. Weberling, F. 1966. Sambucus. In Illustrierte flora von Mitteleuropa. Vol. 6(2). Hegi, G. (ed.), Verlag Paul Parey Berlin, Hamburg Pp. 15-32 (in German)
  52. Wendel, J. F. and N. F. Weeden. 1989. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In Isozymes in Plant Biology. Soltis, D. E. and P. S. Soltis (eds.), Dioscorides Press, Portland. Pp. 5-45